The Migrant Caravan was Paid for by Major Left-of-Center Foundations… the Open Society, MacArthur, Ford, and Carnegie

starving refugee checks iphone

One of the groups helping Central American migrants reach the US border is Pueblo Sin Fronteras.  (https://www.pueblosinfronteras.org/index.html)

Their website says: 

“We are an all volunteer collective of friends who decided to be in permanent solidarity with displaced peoples.

We accompany migrants and refugees in their journey of hope, and together demand our human rights.

We provide humanitarian aid  and  professional legal advise  to migrants and refugees.”

But really, who is paying for this?

BORDER CARAVAN? CALL IT THE GEORGE SOROS EXPRESS

Billionaire’s deep pockets linked to 3 of 4 groups behind ‘refugee’ invasion coalition

WND News 

Hundreds of Central American migrants demanding asylum at the U.S. border with Mexico Sunday may be poor, but they have support of major foundations, corporations and billionaire George Soros for their well-organized caravan-style invasion.

President Trump has instructed the Department of Homeland Security not to allow the caravan into the U.S. to hear their asylum claims. They are expected to attempt to enter the U.S. Sunday.

The caravan is organized by a group called Pueblo sin Fronteras. But the effort is supported by the coalition CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project, which includes Catholic Legal Immigration Network, the American Immigration Council, the Refugee and Immigration Center for Education and Legal Services and the American Immigration Lawyers Association – thus the acronym CARA. At least three of the four groups are funded By George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, WND has confirmed.

Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/04/border-caravan-call-it-the-george-soros-express/#aeejhVlARJHZjWPt.99

Influence Watch: Pueblo Sin Fronteras

“The Pueblo Sin Fronteras (“People Without Borders”) is a project of La Familia Latina Unida, a Chicago, Illinois-based 501(c)(4) illegal immigration advocacy organization formed in 2001 by Elvira Arellano, an activist for immigrants living illegally in the United States. The organization is affiliated with the Chicago-based 501(c)(3) pro-illegal immigration groups Centro Sin Fronteras and Pueblo Sin Fronteras. Together, the organizations have been involved in organizing approximately 1,000 economic migrants from Central America to attempt to cross the U.S. and Mexican borders illegally since 2010.
 These organizations have been funded by a number of major left-of-center grantmaking foundations, including the Open Society FoundationsMacArthur FoundationFord Foundation, and Carnegie Corporation of New York[35] The caravan eventually halted in Mexico City on April 4 instead of reaching the United States border.[36]”

Guilt-By-Association: Globalists and Dinosaur Media Hit Back at Anyone with Alternative Viewpoints in the New Media Landscape

Truth is the New Hate Speech
Truth is the New Hate Speech

SO this foundation called Data and Society, that is funded entirely by globalists and leftists, the New York Times, George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and many more has come out with a list of guilty-by-association YouTubers, claiming that they are dangerous because they discuss alternative viewpoints from mainstream “liberalism.” (Of course today’s mainstream liberalism actually means globalist communism run by an upper class of unelected technocrats… like in the EU.)

They include a diagram of YouTube personalities and connect them with a bunch of red lines, claiming to map out all of their guest appearances on each other’s shows.

They don’t mention that many of these YouTubers and personalities are usually opposing each other.

They don’t mention that many of these guest appearances were to have a debate between opposing ideas. Very few of these people agree about everything.

Alternative Influencers Network from Data and Society Foundation
The Guardian

Apparently it’s “extremist” to invite people onto each other’s shows… and debate any views differing from the corporate mainstream.

“the problem is fundamentally linked to the social network of political influencers on the platform and how, like other YouTube influencers, they invite one another on to their shows.”

Apparently, these “influencers” have a wide range of positions, including just plain old conservatism… so they’re not all “dangerous extremists,” but they’re dangerous because they’ve debated with “extremists” on their show.

Or does having any non-liberal viewpoint make someone an extremist?

“promoting a range of rightwing political positions, from mainstream conservatism to overt white nationalism.”

How are they “overt” white nationalists? Did they say something good about white people? How can you be an “overt” white nationalist, or is the author just throwing out highly emotional, negative words hoping it sticks?

This is propaganda, pure and simple. This is a hit piece against the competition in media and the competition of ideas.

Remember these YouTubers have won in the ratings war, especially since they claim Joe Rogan is one of these dangerous influencers.

And non-leftist and non-globalist views are making a comeback as people realize the lies behind multicultural globalism as an ideology.

Just look again at that list of the people who sponsored this report… the motive is clear, they’re all globalists that want power and profit by exploiting countries and their people. 

Any view advocating people’s rights is called “Nationalism” and any view against demographic warfare through mass immigration is called “White Nationalism” or “White Supremacy.”

When did people lose the right to free speech and association?

This is Nineteen-Eighty-Four-level stuff. This is the real world example of Orwell’s Newspeak. They are trying to rewrite reason and logic and debate to all mean dangerous and subversive because it doesn’t agree with their ideology and agenda.

YouTube’s ‘alternative influence network’ breeds rightwing radicalisation, report finds

YouTube provides a breeding ground for far-right radicalisation, where people interested in conservative and libertarian ideas are quickly exposed to white nationalist ones, according to a report from Data & Society.

Although YouTube’s recommendation algorithms are partly to blame, the problem is fundamentally linked to the social network of political influencers on the platform and how, like other YouTube influencers, they invite one another on to their shows.

The report describes an “alternative influence network” of about 65 scholars, media pundits and internet celebrities promoting a range of rightwing political positions, from mainstream conservatism to overt white nationalism. They are broadly united by their reactionary position: an opposition to feminism, social justice and leftwing politics and present themselves as an underdog alternative to the mainstream media.

Read More: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/sep/18/report-youtubes-alternative-influence-network-breeds-rightwing-radicalisation/

Read the Report here: https://datasociety.net/output/alternative-influence/

An Open Letter to Olivia Solon

by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
February 11, 2018

As attentive Corbett Report viewers will already know, The Guardian was the recipient of the highest dishonor of the year this year: The award for “Fakest Fake News Story of the Year 2017” at my First Annual REAL Fake News Awards (aka “the Dinos”). Specifically, the dishonor was bestowed on The Guardian’s San Francisco-based technology reporter, Olivia Solon, for her breathtaking contribution to the annals of establishment fake news hackery, “How Syria’s White Helmets became victims of an online propaganda machine.”

The report, for those who have not read it yet, is as exactly what you would expect from an establishment stenography institution like The Guardian: The so-called “Syrian Civil Defence,” aka the White Helmets, are pure and virtuous; anyone who questions them is an anti-imperialist activist/conspiracy theorist/troll with support from the Russian government; no criticisms of the group are valid and they’ve all been refuted by reputable fact-checkers like Snopes; blah blah blah, etc., etc. As I say, you know exactly how the story goes…but you should read it anyway. It really is a perfect snapshot of the template that the MSM uses to discredit any and all opposition, and it would have been incredible effective…in the 1950s, when people still trusted the mainstream media. (Protip: no one trusts the MSM anymore!)

This being the age of the internet, though, it’s impossible for fake news stories like this to fly with an increasingly informed and connected public. When The Guardian ran its hit piece on the independent researchers like Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett and Tim Anderson, all of whom are countering the mainstream White Helmets / Syria narrative, they simply responded on their own websites and social media and in interviews on independent media sites, probably reaching more people in the process.

One of the highlights of this response came in Eva Bartlett’s rebuttal of The Guardian smear job, “How the Mainstream Media Whitewashed Al-Qaeda and the White Helmets in Syria.” In that report, Bartlett published Olivia Solon’s actual emails to Bartlett when Solon was seeking comment for her article. Stop what you’re doing and read those emails right now.

Read More: https://www.corbettreport.com/an-open-letter-to-olivia-solon/