Shilling for Soros: Washington Posts’ Omission of Facts in Defense of a Narrative

Darth Soros

On Saturday, the Washington Post published an article by Griff Witte titled: “Once-fringe Soros conspiracy theory takes center stage in Hungarian election,” in which the author disingenuously writes off any and all involvement by the left-wing billionaire in politics as a far-right, tin-hat conspiracy theory despite direct evidence to the contrary.

In his article, Witte never once mentions the 2016 release of documents obtained from Soros’ Open Society Foundation (OSF) and published on DCLeaks.com.

In fact, one document titled: “Open Society Foundations – International Migration Initiative”, details how the OSF is able to directly influence the immigration policy of European governments by working in conjunction with other immigration activist groups including but not limited to the International Migration Institute (IMI), the MacArthur Foundation, the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), the International Detention Coalition (IDC).

As detailed in another document titled “Reliable allies in the European Parliament (2014 – 2019)”, the Open Society European Policy Institute has been very successful in its ongoing influence campaign within the European Parliament. This 127-page document lists a total of 226 EU MEPs that are likely to support the Open Society Foundation and its many initiatives. In other words, nearly one-third of European Parliament seats are held by so-called “reliable allies” of Mr. Soros.

Included in this list of MEPs who have chosen to instead represent the views of global elites over their fellow countrymen are Hungarian MEPs Tamás Meszerics and Péter Niedermüller.

Tamás Meszerics is a member of the Politics Can Be Different, part of the European Green Party, and since 2014, has served as an MEP as part of The Greens–European Free Alliance. Tamás also serves on the Board of Governors for the European Endowment for Democracy, which includes the Open Society Institute among its partner organizations. Tamás also works as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, at the Soros founded Central European University, where he teaches a course entitled: “Democracy between Crisis and Transformation: Normative and Institutional Perspectives”.

Since July 2014, Péter Niedermüller has served as a Member of the European Parliament, representing Hungary for the Democratic Coalition. Niedermüller also serves as the Treasurer of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament.

Niedermüller has also been an outspoken critic of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, referring to his attacks on Mr. Soros as “hate propaganda”. Lacking any substantive argument, Niedermüller has not surprisingly labeled any and all attacks against Soros as anti-Semitic.

Instead of providing any information to the reader regarding Soros’ influence over members of the European Parliament, Witte has instead chosen to provide a one-sided, fact-free assortment of political talking points, in order to attack the current Hungarian government, and by extension, influence the reader.

Throughout the article, Witte also provides statements given by various advocacy groups, in order to bolster his argument. However, again, Witte conveniently omits key, factual information regarding these various groups’ associations with Mr. Soros and his foundation.

For example, Witte cites statements given by Márta Pardavi, Co-Chair of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee without disclosing Márta’s ties to Soros or that the Hungarian Helsinki Committee receives the majority of its funding (34%) from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Read More: https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/03/shilling-for-soros-washington-posts-omission-of-facts-in-defense-of-a-narrative/

Documents Prove Riots are Soros Funded and Directed

Well, now we have it. Documented evidence that a Soros-backed PAC was covertly organizing, busing and paying people to pose as protesters AND had an agreement with some local law enforcement officials to allow riots to occur.

This is terrorism. 

From Instructor Craig at Uncle Sams Misguided Children.com

Soros Funded Baltimore Riots

EVIDENCE THAT ‘FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY’ FUNDED AND PLANNED BALTIMORE RIOTS

A document was found marked “confidential” – it is a clear set of guidelines and instructions written for paid protesters in Baltimore. You may recall LARGE protests broke out in Baltimore shortly after the April 15th, 2015 death of Freddie Gray. There has long been rumor and ‘conspiracy theory’ that all of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organizing and rioting was funded by special interest groups, namely, George Soros.  Do we now FINALLY have proof of that claim with documents labeled as from ‘Friends of Democracy?’  You be the judge as I break down each page of this document.

This article dives into what appears to be DEEPLY rooted corruption among Baltimore officials, law enforcement (LE) and even Tax Authorities (state? federal?).  The documents in question also seem to implicate someone with ties to US Intelligence or US military.

WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ BARES A STRIKING RESEMBLANCE TO A MILITARY OPERATION.
PART 1. THE DOCUMENT.
PAGE 1

You can clearly see the “Friends of Democracy” letterhead on the top left.  “Friends of Democracy” is owned by, none other than, Jonathan Soros, son of billionaire and liberal financier George Soros. This article will explain everything you need to know about the Super- PAC that is “Friends of Democracy.”

On the top right of the document you can see a “Confidential level 7” tag. This tells me US government intelligence involvement, or that some one with US government Confidentiality Classifications knowledge is attached to this document.  Here is an FAS.org publication on US government security classifications.  I have taken the liberty to cut the “Confidential Information” portion and post it here as a photo.

Confidential 7, Mobilization plans, I would say that would fit the description of what this document is…Mobilization plans.

Three other things really stand out on this front page.

  • The goal is “to seize as much momentum as possible from current civil unrest in the BWI (Baltimore/Washington International) area”
  • The mention of “friendly officials.” Are these the bought and paid for LE and BWI officials?.
  • This is a paid function and they desperately want to keep that secret “**DO NOT discuss the distribution or fulfillment of funds during the action.”

Lastly we can address the note jotted down in the top right corner that says, “Make sure to also get index from OSI.”  What is OSI? OSI stands for the “Open Society Institute” which is now called the “Open Society Foundation” and was founded by George Soros according to wikipedia.  Further tying George Soros, and his seemingly “philanthropic” organizations, to military-like actions on US soil, where the goal is to create civil unrest.  This has long been a conspiracy theory, now we have documents to connect the dots. Does George Soros use his organizations as a means to funnel money into illegal activities for political gain?

PAGE 2

Shows the mobilization points for different sects of paid rioters, the routes to take to the “demonstration”, and the demobilization route.

Note the first paragraph under the map.  “These routes have been guaranteed by friendly BWI officials and LE as safe for ops and auxops.” This points even more clearly to how deep this operation ran.  BWI officials and Law Enforcement were both made “friendly”, or for a more direct term, were they paid off?

The second paragraph shows possible military/ex-military or intelligence involvement as well.  The term “comms,” though easily understood and commonly used, does come from military, but what strikes me more is the referral to 328BG.  328BG is nothing more than a model of tracfone, an LG tracfone to be exact. Why is this relevant? Again, this is how the military refers to equipment. By model number.

PAGE 12 (THE NEXT AVAILABLE)

This page goes over “legal” and the overall objectives of the operation. READ CAREFULLY.

The top of this page represents just how deep the op went.  AOEC has a well established chain of command, medics and most importantly they had been cleared to break the law and be violent.  The final paragraph of the top portion states clearly that BWI officials and Law Enforcement issued protections to participants of the operation, allowing them to be violent.  Yes, you saw that correctly LAW ENFORCEMENT and  Baltimore officials allowing violence in the streets. Was it for political gain?  What can’t money buy? The activities allowed are mapped out on the next page.  But, lest we get ahead of ourselves, let’s go over the bottom portion of page 12.

The objectives of the operation, Primary, Secondary, Tertiary (third), and IDEAL. Primary goals are to provoke “hostile” LE and BWI Officials.  By hostile they mean the honest people that couldn’t be bought. It is in the “secondary” and “ideal” objectives that you see the big picture.  The op is all about, “creating an envioronment where organic CONFLICT can grow,” they want to inspire organic actions across the nation, and they want martial-law-like policies to be effected. These goals are very important to keep in mind as we progress.

PAGE 13

This page describes how the paid rioters should act during the op.  Including what types of violence can be used and when it is permitted.

Things of note. Well, there is one HUGELY important sentence on this page.

“POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.”  Who is D.A. Donnelly? Why is it so important to hide his involvement? Is he the District Attorney? We will revisit this soon.

Operators on this page are instructed not to use any props during the op, “unless locals have already begun to do so,” in which case using any “small blunt object” (bottles, rocks, etc) was deemed to be permissible. Remember, Law Enforcement is clearly involved in this op and they are allowing the use of blunt objects and violence to incite none operatives to do the same.

Under “General Behavior” notice the very last statement in bold, “STICK TO YOUR PERSONALITY PROFILE ASSIGNMENT.” This shows you just how advanced and well planned this op actually is.  Directors will do this with extras in a movie to add dynamics and to create an authentic feel. For example in a movie where there is a shootout, some of the extras will have an assignment to flee, others to hide, some to scream and others to be silent. Like a movie, this op was orchestrated to have an organic feel.  Giving the operators personality assignments ensures this.

The very last section “aggressiveness” drives home how involved/corrupt LE was. The doc says not to engage with friendly LE as “they have been instructed merely to not engage, they have NOT been told to assist.”  Also in this section is something scary. Some local LE were actually reporting to AOEC, according to the document.

“Remember timing and assignment of escalations is determined by conditions on the ground and intelligence from LEs channeled through AOEC.”  Let that sink in. Some officers sworn to protect and serve, according to this document, were reporting to this group, the so called “AOEC”, feeding them intelligence so they would know when and where to escalate violence.

PAGE 24 (NEXT AVAILABLE)

This page refers to the funding.  Who’s going to pay the rioters for their work on the op?

This page brings us back to D.A. Donnelly, as you can see the same Heading at the top of this page “POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.” Later on the page, near the sticky note, you can see his name mentioned again.

This section states that “disbursements,” payments, are all subject to review and approval from Donnelly. Turns out D.A. Donnelly does not mean District Attorney, in fact D.A. we can reasonably assume, are his first two initials.  David Donnelly the TREASURER of “FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY” as you can see here.  It is pretty important, I suppose, to make it perfectly clear to keep quiet about who is funding such an illegal operation, that involves bribery at it’s highest level AND tax evasion.

The second to last paragraph then states in bold caps “DO NOT REPORT THIS INCOME TO ANYBODY.” The document claims that all payments have been coordinated with relevant tax authorities (one can only imagine who that may be) and accounting firms to make sure that all funding is distributed through appropriate channels to preserve “opsec” (an intelligence term for “operational security”).

This shows us that the op goes even deeper, as “Tax authorities” (IRS?) were used to hide, “launder”, the money to the operators. Based on the sticky note on the side of this page, we are talking about a large amount of money being funneled through this organization and out to the operatives.  Which would lead one to believe that the highest level of “tax authorities” are involved.

THIS is how Soros and company remain under the radar when paying for these ops in the US.  They “own” the Tax authorities which allows them to funnel money, “un-detected,” from their organizations down the chain of command to the operatives.

Finally the last thing that stands out on this final page of the document (available) is the last line. “As with previous FOD (friends of democracy) actions…” This tells us, that this is not the first time this organization has implemented this militant style op on OUR american soil.

PART 2
THE IMPLICATION

The Baltimore riots of 2015 left 113 police officers injured, 2 people shot and one fire victim in critical condition. 486 citizens were arrested. Of that number it is unclear how many were prosecuted to the full extent of the law. The corruption didn’t end with local or state LE. 

We even saw the Mayor of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (was she more than likely compensated for her actions?) issue an order for police to stand down. Imagine that? The mayor of a major US city, tells law enforcement to stand down and allow RIOTING, destruction of property, and violence to reign supreme in her city. Read more on this pathetic woman’s actions here. Aside from the injuries and arrests the city of Baltimore saw an estimated $20 Million in damages.

This type of operation could not have been planned out and executed by an average person.  The person who wrote this document clearly had either military/intelligence affiliation or training. I can assume this because of words like “comms”, “OPS”, “AUXOPS” “OPSEC”, “confidential level 7”, “328BG”, and all of the various acronyms used.

This operation was run like a covert military op and has a striking resemblance to the CIA 1953 Iran coup to remove Prime Minister Mossadegh from power.  The mastermind behind the coup, CIA Operative Kermit Roosevelt, used this EXACT method to divide the people of Tehran, to give the appearance that PM Mossadegh had lost control of the people.  Roosevelt also bought the media, spreading disinformation across Iran, stating that Mossadegh was a communist. A biased media, and the illusion of civil unrest was enough for the coup to take root and eventually be successful in Iran.

Does that not strike a very similar chord as to what is going on here in the US today? Are we not suffering from an incredibly biased, bought and paid for, media (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC etc.) that spreads disinformation about our democratically elected official? Calling him just about every name in the book. Do we now have evidence of, what appears to be, a Kermit Roosevelt style attempt at creating civil unrest for political gain? Is there an active attempt at a coup going on in our country? If so, it is embedded deep within our legal system as well as our financial system.

Is this page one of the handbook on how to overthrow a democratically elected government, control the media, create civil unrest?  You have the information, you be the judge.

Read More: https://news.unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/friends-of-democracy-funded-planned-baltimore-riots/

George Soros’s $18 Billion Tax Shelter

That’s $18 billion in globalist, corporatist propaganda that will be coming through the airwaves, web, print and in the form of paid protests.

Most of this won’t be directly attributed to Soros, but to a bunch of organizations and foundations that are funded by his donations and directed by his agenda, behind-the-scenes.

The people have our work cut out for us when a single individual has this much power to covertly influence society for his own profit and agenda.

George Soros quote: "Deliberately misleading propaganda techniques can destroy an open society."

Congress is still scrambling to find ways to pay for its tax cut, so perhaps it should pay closer attention to last month’s news that George Soros had transferred $18 billion of his fortune to a private charity that he controls. There it will be sheltered from the Internal Revenue Service forever. This may be the single biggest tax dodge in U.S. history, yet no one on the right or left seems to have raised an eyebrow.

True tax reform is predicated on the principle that all income should be taxed at a low rate once, and only once. But much of the wealth that Mr. Soros spent years moving into his Open Society Foundations will never be taxed. A gift of billions of dollars of appreciated stock escapes any capital gains tax, and the estate tax as well. So Mr. Soros can donate appreciated stock that Open Society Foundations can liquidate without the government ever taking a cut.

There’s more. When a person donates untaxed, appreciated assets to a private foundation, he may also deduct up to 20% of its market value on his personal return, carrying forward this deduction for five years. This double write-off may be the sweetest deal in the tax code.

The donors also can retain control of the money within the private foundation for years or even decades before it is disbursed. Since the foundation can employ family members at six-figure salaries for life to “administer” it, the umbilical cord to the donor never has to be cut.

Congress should stop ignoring this tax-avoidance scheme. The super rich have already poured hundreds of billions into private foundations, but the figure could soon be in the trillions. Mark Zuckerberg has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook shares, currently estimated to be worth somewhere around $70 billion, and much of it will go to a foundation his family controls. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have each put roughly $30 billion tax-free into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This has left the foundation so flush that it spent $500 million on a 12-acre, 900,000-square-foot office complex in Seattle for its 1,500 employees. This is philanthropy?

I don’t question these billionaires’ right to do with their money as they wish. I’m simply arguing that Congress shouldn’t let the rich and politically powerful use private foundations to escape taxation. This loophole is one reason for an anomaly in our otherwise progressive tax code: The top 1% of earners pay an effective tax rate of 23%, but the top 0.001% pay only 18%.

Mr. Buffett has sanctimoniously denounced the fact that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. His suggestion is that Congress raise taxes on capital gains. But even if the tax rates were lifted, say, to 50%, Mr. Buffett still wouldn’t have to pay it on the tens of billions of dollars he puts into private foundations, and he would still be able to deduct a fifth of that contribution on future tax returns.

This tax favoritism might be defensible to promote genuine philanthropic activities.

Many billionaires, such as the Gateses and David Koch, have heroically donated to fight cancer and malaria or provide relief to hurricane and earthquake victims.

But others, including Mr. Soros and Michael Bloomberg, have turned private foundations into massive de facto lobbying operations for bigger government and liberal causes like higher minimum wages, gun control, universal health care, and a carbon tax. Mr. Soros’s $18 billion gift alone is the equivalent of maybe 100 Heritage Foundations. This kind of weaponized philanthropy has the potential to undermine the American free enterprise system.

Yes, billions go to groups on the right, too, from Mr. Koch and others. But regardless of ideology, why shouldn’t tax be collected before the money is given away? What message does it send that the Republican tax-reform bills retain this trillion-dollar loophole for the super rich, at the same time as the House plan eliminates the adoption credit for middle-class families who want to help children?

One simple solution would be for Congress to apply the capital-gains tax to assets of more than $1 million before they are transferred to a charity. This could even finance cutting the capital-gains rate to 15% for everyone.

Alternatively (or perhaps in addition) Congress could cap deductions for any given household to $250,000 a year. Under this kind of plan, Mr. Soros would be able to write off only a tiny fraction of his multi-billion dollar gift.

This isn’t an argument against charity. But selfless and effective giving is not motivated by tax breaks. Two-thirds of Americans don’t itemize their deductions, yet millions give until it hurts. In the 1980s, individual donations to charities surged, even as the top tax rate—and thus the maximum value of the write-off—fell from 70% to 28%.

The question is whether a tax code that encourages dynastic family foundations is good for America. If Congress stopped letting billionaires pour money tax free into the foundation-industrial complex, it would go a long way toward lowering rates and making the tax code fairer for everyone. This would help the economy grow faster, which is the best way to help those in need.