Guilt-By-Association: Globalists and Dinosaur Media Hit Back at Anyone with Alternative Viewpoints in the New Media Landscape

Truth is the New Hate Speech
Truth is the New Hate Speech

SO this foundation called Data and Society, that is funded entirely by globalists and leftists, the New York Times, George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and many more has come out with a list of guilty-by-association YouTubers, claiming that they are dangerous because they discuss alternative viewpoints from mainstream “liberalism.” (Of course today’s mainstream liberalism actually means globalist communism run by an upper class of unelected technocrats… like in the EU.)

They include a diagram of YouTube personalities and connect them with a bunch of red lines, claiming to map out all of their guest appearances on each other’s shows.

They don’t mention that many of these YouTubers and personalities are usually opposing each other.

They don’t mention that many of these guest appearances were to have a debate between opposing ideas. Very few of these people agree about everything.

Alternative Influencers Network from Data and Society Foundation
The Guardian

Apparently it’s “extremist” to invite people onto each other’s shows… and debate any views differing from the corporate mainstream.

“the problem is fundamentally linked to the social network of political influencers on the platform and how, like other YouTube influencers, they invite one another on to their shows.”

Apparently, these “influencers” have a wide range of positions, including just plain old conservatism… so they’re not all “dangerous extremists,” but they’re dangerous because they’ve debated with “extremists” on their show.

Or does having any non-liberal viewpoint make someone an extremist?

“promoting a range of rightwing political positions, from mainstream conservatism to overt white nationalism.”

How are they “overt” white nationalists? Did they say something good about white people? How can you be an “overt” white nationalist, or is the author just throwing out highly emotional, negative words hoping it sticks?

This is propaganda, pure and simple. This is a hit piece against the competition in media and the competition of ideas.

Remember these YouTubers have won in the ratings war, especially since they claim Joe Rogan is one of these dangerous influencers.

And non-leftist and non-globalist views are making a comeback as people realize the lies behind multicultural globalism as an ideology.

Just look again at that list of the people who sponsored this report… the motive is clear, they’re all globalists that want power and profit by exploiting countries and their people. 

Any view advocating people’s rights is called “Nationalism” and any view against demographic warfare through mass immigration is called “White Nationalism” or “White Supremacy.”

When did people lose the right to free speech and association?

This is Nineteen-Eighty-Four-level stuff. This is the real world example of Orwell’s Newspeak. They are trying to rewrite reason and logic and debate to all mean dangerous and subversive because it doesn’t agree with their ideology and agenda.

YouTube’s ‘alternative influence network’ breeds rightwing radicalisation, report finds

YouTube provides a breeding ground for far-right radicalisation, where people interested in conservative and libertarian ideas are quickly exposed to white nationalist ones, according to a report from Data & Society.

Although YouTube’s recommendation algorithms are partly to blame, the problem is fundamentally linked to the social network of political influencers on the platform and how, like other YouTube influencers, they invite one another on to their shows.

The report describes an “alternative influence network” of about 65 scholars, media pundits and internet celebrities promoting a range of rightwing political positions, from mainstream conservatism to overt white nationalism. They are broadly united by their reactionary position: an opposition to feminism, social justice and leftwing politics and present themselves as an underdog alternative to the mainstream media.

Read More: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/sep/18/report-youtubes-alternative-influence-network-breeds-rightwing-radicalisation/

Read the Report here: https://datasociety.net/output/alternative-influence/

An Open Letter to Olivia Solon

by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
February 11, 2018

As attentive Corbett Report viewers will already know, The Guardian was the recipient of the highest dishonor of the year this year: The award for “Fakest Fake News Story of the Year 2017” at my First Annual REAL Fake News Awards (aka “the Dinos”). Specifically, the dishonor was bestowed on The Guardian’s San Francisco-based technology reporter, Olivia Solon, for her breathtaking contribution to the annals of establishment fake news hackery, “How Syria’s White Helmets became victims of an online propaganda machine.”

The report, for those who have not read it yet, is as exactly what you would expect from an establishment stenography institution like The Guardian: The so-called “Syrian Civil Defence,” aka the White Helmets, are pure and virtuous; anyone who questions them is an anti-imperialist activist/conspiracy theorist/troll with support from the Russian government; no criticisms of the group are valid and they’ve all been refuted by reputable fact-checkers like Snopes; blah blah blah, etc., etc. As I say, you know exactly how the story goes…but you should read it anyway. It really is a perfect snapshot of the template that the MSM uses to discredit any and all opposition, and it would have been incredible effective…in the 1950s, when people still trusted the mainstream media. (Protip: no one trusts the MSM anymore!)

This being the age of the internet, though, it’s impossible for fake news stories like this to fly with an increasingly informed and connected public. When The Guardian ran its hit piece on the independent researchers like Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett and Tim Anderson, all of whom are countering the mainstream White Helmets / Syria narrative, they simply responded on their own websites and social media and in interviews on independent media sites, probably reaching more people in the process.

One of the highlights of this response came in Eva Bartlett’s rebuttal of The Guardian smear job, “How the Mainstream Media Whitewashed Al-Qaeda and the White Helmets in Syria.” In that report, Bartlett published Olivia Solon’s actual emails to Bartlett when Solon was seeking comment for her article. Stop what you’re doing and read those emails right now.

Read More: https://www.corbettreport.com/an-open-letter-to-olivia-solon/

NGOs and the NED are Another Tool of Control by the Oligarchs

NGOs Are The Deep State’s Trojan Horses

 • 05/21/2018

The Trojan horse was the earliest recorded military psyop. That psyop continues to be deployed on unsuspecting populations and it is just as useful as ever, but today’s tricksters have donned the mantle of philanthropy, and their Trojan horses are not wooden statues but non-governmental organizations offering “aid” to foreign nations. In today’s edition of The Corbett Report, we’ll learn about how NGOs are the deep state’s Trojan horses.

Read More: https://www.corbettreport.com/ngo/

END Globalism and the Bilderberg Era

Globalist Cabal Diagram

The Beginning of the End of the Bilderberg Era

Alastair CROOKE | 25.06.2018

…”A ‘Burnham Landscape’ of apparently, ‘centrist’ European political parties, apparently independent think-tanks, institutions, and NATO structures, was seeded by CIA – in the post war era of anti-Sovietism – across Europe, and the Middle East – as part of Burnham’s ‘battle plan’ for a US-led, global ‘order’. It is precisely this élite: i.e. Burnham’s oligarchic technocracy, that is facing political push-back today to the point at which the Liberal Order feels that it is struggling for its very survival against the enemy in the White House, as the editor of Spiegel Online has termed President Trump.

What has caused this? Well, like him or hate him, President Trump has played a major part, if only by saying the unsayable. The rationality or not inherent in these Eckhart-style ‘unsayings’, or apophasis, is beside the point: Trump’s intuitive ‘discourse of saying the unsayable’ has taken most of the bolts out of the former Burnham-type, ideological structure.

But in Europe, two main flaws to the Burnham blueprint have contributed, possibly fatally, to the blueprint crisis: Firstly, the policy of populating Europe with immigrants, as a remedy for Europe’s adverse demographics (and to dilute to the point of erasure, its national cultures): “Far from leading to fusion”, writes British historian, Niall Ferguson, “Europe’s migration crisis is leading to fission. The play might be called The Meltdown Pot … Increasingly … the issue of migration will be seen by future historians as the fatal solvent of the EU. In their accounts Brexit will appear as merely an early symptom of the crisis”. And secondly, the bi-furcation of the economy into two unrelated, and dis-equal economies, as a result of the élite’s mismanagement of the global economy, (i.e. the obvious the absence of ‘prosperity for all’).

Trump evidently has heard the two key messages from his constituency: that they neither accept to have (white) American culture, and its way-of-life, diluted through immigration; and, neither do they wish – stoically – to accommodate to America’s eclipse by China.”…

Read More: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/06/25/beginning-end-bilderberg-era.html

George Soros NGO Partners with Facebook for “Election Security”

Darth Soros

Facebook partners with Atlantic Council to improve election security

ALI BRELAND – 

Facebook announced on Thursday that it is launching a partnership with the Atlantic Council to boost its global election security efforts.

Experts from the international think tank’s Digital Forensic Research Lab will help provide Facebook “real-time insights and updates on emerging threats and disinformation campaigns from around the world.”

Facebook said it will also use the Atlantic Council’s Digital Research Unit Monitoring Missions during elections and other “highly sensitive moments,” according to a post written by Facebook’s global politics and government outreach director, Katie Harbath.

The social media company will also consult with the Atlantic Council to address other political security issues that could arise on its platform.

The partnership comes as a part of Facebook’s efforts to beef up election security on its platforms following some groups attempting to use it as a tool to interfere in other countries’ elections.

The company has fielded heavy criticism from politicians over how Russian trolls spread misinformation and attempted to sow discord during the 2016 presidential race. Foreign groups attempted similar operations in other countries’ elections as well.

Though the most firey criticism directed at Facebook over the issue of election security has come from the U.S., the company said that it is focused on making sure its platform can’t be manipulated by nefarious groups abroad as well.

Read More: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/388166-facebook-partners-with-atlantic-council-to-improve-election-security

George Soros: Billionaire Seeks to Undo Democratic Decision to Keep Centralized Control Over Nations

“The Sovereignty Of States Must Be Subordinated To International Law And International Institutions.” George Soros

Soros – One of the Greatest Threats Against Society?

Martin Armstrong
Feb 9, 2018

The Telegraph is now reporting that Soros “is one of three senior figures linked to the Remain-supporting campaign group Best for Britain who plan to launch a nationwide advertising campaign this month, which they hope will lead to a second referendum to keep Britain in the EU.” Soros is on the wrong side. Europe has no chance of the EU Project actually succeeding long-term. The entire structure is completely unsound and the political process is anti-Democrat. The EU was purposefully designed to be as close to a dictatorship where the people are not trusted to make any decision and are too stupid to even know how to spend their own money. Nobody in the Troika ever stands for an election and they are the people who rule with an iron fist over the economy.

Read More: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/britain/soros-one-of-the-greatest-threats-against-society/

Who Deserves to Have an Identity? Who Deserves to Have a Country?

It's Not Okay to Be White

Europe’s “refugee” crisis and the Kalergi plan for white genocide

 by   

In a recent op/ed titled “Can Europe Survive This Invasion?,” Patrick Buchanan writes:

With birth rates in this smallest and least populated of continents below replacement levels for decades, Europe is aging, shrinking and dying, as it is being invaded and altered forever. […]

Unlike America, Europe has never known mass immigration. And those pouring into Europe are Arab, African and Muslim, not European Christians or Jews. They come from other civilizations and cultures. And they are not all assimilating but rather creating enclaves in Europe that replicate the lands whence they came. […]

The threats raised by the mass migration into Europe rise to the level of the existential.

Can a civilization survive the replacement of the people who created it by people of other races, religions, and civilizations?

Ask the Native Americans.

Will Europe remain Europe if she is repopulated by Arabs, Muslims, Asians and Africans? What will hold Europe together? Free trade?

The current invasion of Europe by “refugees” from the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia is engineered and enabled by politicians (with the exception of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban), without the support of Europe’s peoples. That raises the obvious question: Why are European politicians promoting what Buchanan, Orban and any person (whose mind hasn’t been turned into mush by PC propaganda) so clearly see — the systematic destruction, via demographics, of European civilization and its people?

One explanation reaches back to the 1920s, to a plan drafted by a bi-racial Austrian-Japanese named Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), whose parents were the Austro-Hugarian diplomat Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of a Tokyo oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and landowner.

Richard Nikolaus, more commonly known as Coudenhove-Kalergi, was a Free Mason and an advocate of racial mixing. He is regarded as a father of the European Union, being the founder and president for 49 years until his death of the first movement for a united Europe, the Paneuropean Union.

In his 1925 book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote that “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice.”

Though not himself a Jew according to Wikipedia, Kalergi extolled a kind of Jewish supremacism, characterizing Jews as “a spiritual nobility of Europe” — “a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit” formed just “when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated,” in the crucible of antisemitism wherein “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process.”

As Europe finds itself overwhelmed by the incoming hordes of “refugees” and “migrants,” some have turned to what is called the Kalergi Plan to explain why Europe’s political elites encourage and welcome the invasion.

Below is an edited translation of an Italian-language article from the blog Identità.com, which is being reblogged and cited by various websites. The article, by Riccardo Percivaldi, is titled “The Kalergi Plan: the genocide of the European peoples“. I’m presenting this on FOTM without commentary, in the interest of information and to provoke discussion.

~Eowyn

Richard N. Coudenhove-KalergiThe Kalergi Plan: the genocide of the European peoples

By Riccardo Percivaldi • Identità.com • Dec. 11, 2012 

Mass immigration is a phenomenon whose causes are still cleverly hidden by the system and which is falsely represented as inevitable by the multicultural propaganda. With this article we intend to demonstrate once and for all that mass immigration is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What appears to you as inevitable is actually the fruition of a decades-long plan to destroy completely the face of the Old Continent.

PAN EUROPA

Few people know that one of the main architects of European integration was also the one with a plan for the genocide of European peoples. He is a dark character whose existence is not known by the masses but whom the powerful consider as the founding father of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. While he was alive, he moved behind the scenes, away from the spotlight, and managed to attract the most important heads of state in Europe, who became his supporters and promoters of European unification. In 1922, he founded the Pan Europa movement in Vienna. Its goal is to bring about a New World Order based on a federation of nations led by the United States. The unification of Europe would be the first step towards a single world government.

With the rise of fascism in Europe, the plan suffered a setback, resulting in the dissolution of the Pan-European union is forced to dissolve. After the Second World War, Kalergi redoubled his efforts and, aided by the support of Winston Churchill, the Masonic B’nai B’rith lodge, and major newspapers such as the New York Times, Kalergi succeeded in pushing his plan to the US government.

THE KALERGI PLAN

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Kalergi declared that the people of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the original peoples of the Old Continent, but a kind of bestial subhumans made ​​by miscegenation. Kalergi stated in no uncertain terms that you must cross the peoples of Europe with Asian races and color, to create a multiethnic flock without quality and easily controllable by the ruling.

“The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasian-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples, with a variety of personalities.”

Austrian writer Gerd Honsik describes the essence of the Kalergi plan:

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and, subsequently, the elimination of nations by means of ethnic separatist movements or mass allogeneic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. In order for Europe to be mastered by the elite, homogeneous peoples are transformed into a mixed race of whites, blacks and Asians. Kalergi characterized these mestizos as cruel and unfaithful, and maintained that the elite must deliberately create the mestizos to achieve their own superiority.

The elite will first eliminate democracy — the rule of the people. Next, the elite will eliminate the people via miscegenation, thereby replacing the white race with an easily controllable mestizo race. By abolishing the principle of equality of all before the law, avoiding and punishing any criticism of minorities, and protecting the minorities with special laws, the masses are suppressed.

In his time, politicians hearkened to Kalergi — banks and the press were based on his ideas, while U.S. intelligence financed his projects. Europe’s political leaders know that Kalergi was the author of the European Union. Though unknown to the public and untaught in schools, Kalergi is the father of Maastricht and multiculturalism, which indoctrinate Europeans to tolerate and accept subhuman migrants.

Although no school book talks of Kalergi, his ideas were the guiding principles of today’s European Union. His belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with blacks and Asians to destroy European identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of our present policy of protecting and integrating minorities. Disguised as humanitarianism, this policy is aimed at the greatest genocide [of whites] in history.

Europe’s Coudenhove-Kalergi prize was created in his honor. Every two years, Europeans who excelled in pursuing Kalergi’s criminal plan are awarded the prize, among whom are the likes of [German Chancellor] Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy [former Prime Minister of Belgium and the first President of the European Council].

[White] genocide is also the basis of the UN’s welcoming policy toward millions of immigrants to compensate for Europe’s low birth rate. According to a UN report released in January 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration: a solution to declining and aging populations,” Europe would need 159 million immigrants by the year 2025. One wonders how it was possible to make such an accurate estimate if immigration was not a well-rehearsed plan. Certainly, Europe’s low birth rate can easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is equally clear that the genetic heritage of Europe cannot be protected by introducing nonEuropean migrants. On the contrary, mass immigration will only accelerate the disappearance of Europeans. The sole purpose of mass immigration, therefore, is to completely denature a people, turning them into a collection of individuals without any ethnic, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the Kalergi Plan has been and still is the foundation of the official mass immigration policies of European governments, at the cost of the genocide of the peoples of Europe.

As G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (WHO) and a good disciple of Kalergi, said [in 1955]:

“In all places, people must practice the limitation of births and racially mixed marriages so as to create a single race in a new world dependent on a central authority.”

CONCLUSION

If we look around Europe, we can see that the Kalergi Plan seems to be fully realized. We are facing a “terzomondializzazione” or Third Worldization of Europe — a “New Civilization” supported by multicultural missionaries, formed from forced mass immigration of hordes of Africans and Asians. Each year, miscegenation and mixed marriages produce thousands of new individuals of mixed race — the “sons of Kalergi”. Under the media’s dual pressure of misinformation and the propaganda of humanitarianism, Europeans are taught to deny their origins, to deny their ethnic identity.

Advocates of Globalization strive to convince us to give up our identity as a progressive and humanitarian act and to think that holding onto our ethnic and cultural identity is “racism” because they want to make us all into blind consumers. In these times, it is more necessary than ever that we expose the lies of the system so as to rekindle the spirit of rebellion in Europe. Integration is tantamount to genocide. We have no choice but to rebel for the alternative is ethnic suicide.

See also:

 

Read More: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/11/12/europes-refugee-crisis-and-the-kalergi-plan-for-white-genocide/

Documents Prove Riots are Soros Funded and Directed

Well, now we have it. Documented evidence that a Soros-backed PAC was covertly organizing, busing and paying people to pose as protesters AND had an agreement with some local law enforcement officials to allow riots to occur.

This is terrorism. 

From Instructor Craig at Uncle Sams Misguided Children.com

Soros Funded Baltimore Riots

EVIDENCE THAT ‘FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY’ FUNDED AND PLANNED BALTIMORE RIOTS

A document was found marked “confidential” – it is a clear set of guidelines and instructions written for paid protesters in Baltimore. You may recall LARGE protests broke out in Baltimore shortly after the April 15th, 2015 death of Freddie Gray. There has long been rumor and ‘conspiracy theory’ that all of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organizing and rioting was funded by special interest groups, namely, George Soros.  Do we now FINALLY have proof of that claim with documents labeled as from ‘Friends of Democracy?’  You be the judge as I break down each page of this document.

This article dives into what appears to be DEEPLY rooted corruption among Baltimore officials, law enforcement (LE) and even Tax Authorities (state? federal?).  The documents in question also seem to implicate someone with ties to US Intelligence or US military.

WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ BARES A STRIKING RESEMBLANCE TO A MILITARY OPERATION.
PART 1. THE DOCUMENT.
PAGE 1

You can clearly see the “Friends of Democracy” letterhead on the top left.  “Friends of Democracy” is owned by, none other than, Jonathan Soros, son of billionaire and liberal financier George Soros. This article will explain everything you need to know about the Super- PAC that is “Friends of Democracy.”

On the top right of the document you can see a “Confidential level 7” tag. This tells me US government intelligence involvement, or that some one with US government Confidentiality Classifications knowledge is attached to this document.  Here is an FAS.org publication on US government security classifications.  I have taken the liberty to cut the “Confidential Information” portion and post it here as a photo.

Confidential 7, Mobilization plans, I would say that would fit the description of what this document is…Mobilization plans.

Three other things really stand out on this front page.

  • The goal is “to seize as much momentum as possible from current civil unrest in the BWI (Baltimore/Washington International) area”
  • The mention of “friendly officials.” Are these the bought and paid for LE and BWI officials?.
  • This is a paid function and they desperately want to keep that secret “**DO NOT discuss the distribution or fulfillment of funds during the action.”

Lastly we can address the note jotted down in the top right corner that says, “Make sure to also get index from OSI.”  What is OSI? OSI stands for the “Open Society Institute” which is now called the “Open Society Foundation” and was founded by George Soros according to wikipedia.  Further tying George Soros, and his seemingly “philanthropic” organizations, to military-like actions on US soil, where the goal is to create civil unrest.  This has long been a conspiracy theory, now we have documents to connect the dots. Does George Soros use his organizations as a means to funnel money into illegal activities for political gain?

PAGE 2

Shows the mobilization points for different sects of paid rioters, the routes to take to the “demonstration”, and the demobilization route.

Note the first paragraph under the map.  “These routes have been guaranteed by friendly BWI officials and LE as safe for ops and auxops.” This points even more clearly to how deep this operation ran.  BWI officials and Law Enforcement were both made “friendly”, or for a more direct term, were they paid off?

The second paragraph shows possible military/ex-military or intelligence involvement as well.  The term “comms,” though easily understood and commonly used, does come from military, but what strikes me more is the referral to 328BG.  328BG is nothing more than a model of tracfone, an LG tracfone to be exact. Why is this relevant? Again, this is how the military refers to equipment. By model number.

PAGE 12 (THE NEXT AVAILABLE)

This page goes over “legal” and the overall objectives of the operation. READ CAREFULLY.

The top of this page represents just how deep the op went.  AOEC has a well established chain of command, medics and most importantly they had been cleared to break the law and be violent.  The final paragraph of the top portion states clearly that BWI officials and Law Enforcement issued protections to participants of the operation, allowing them to be violent.  Yes, you saw that correctly LAW ENFORCEMENT and  Baltimore officials allowing violence in the streets. Was it for political gain?  What can’t money buy? The activities allowed are mapped out on the next page.  But, lest we get ahead of ourselves, let’s go over the bottom portion of page 12.

The objectives of the operation, Primary, Secondary, Tertiary (third), and IDEAL. Primary goals are to provoke “hostile” LE and BWI Officials.  By hostile they mean the honest people that couldn’t be bought. It is in the “secondary” and “ideal” objectives that you see the big picture.  The op is all about, “creating an envioronment where organic CONFLICT can grow,” they want to inspire organic actions across the nation, and they want martial-law-like policies to be effected. These goals are very important to keep in mind as we progress.

PAGE 13

This page describes how the paid rioters should act during the op.  Including what types of violence can be used and when it is permitted.

Things of note. Well, there is one HUGELY important sentence on this page.

“POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.”  Who is D.A. Donnelly? Why is it so important to hide his involvement? Is he the District Attorney? We will revisit this soon.

Operators on this page are instructed not to use any props during the op, “unless locals have already begun to do so,” in which case using any “small blunt object” (bottles, rocks, etc) was deemed to be permissible. Remember, Law Enforcement is clearly involved in this op and they are allowing the use of blunt objects and violence to incite none operatives to do the same.

Under “General Behavior” notice the very last statement in bold, “STICK TO YOUR PERSONALITY PROFILE ASSIGNMENT.” This shows you just how advanced and well planned this op actually is.  Directors will do this with extras in a movie to add dynamics and to create an authentic feel. For example in a movie where there is a shootout, some of the extras will have an assignment to flee, others to hide, some to scream and others to be silent. Like a movie, this op was orchestrated to have an organic feel.  Giving the operators personality assignments ensures this.

The very last section “aggressiveness” drives home how involved/corrupt LE was. The doc says not to engage with friendly LE as “they have been instructed merely to not engage, they have NOT been told to assist.”  Also in this section is something scary. Some local LE were actually reporting to AOEC, according to the document.

“Remember timing and assignment of escalations is determined by conditions on the ground and intelligence from LEs channeled through AOEC.”  Let that sink in. Some officers sworn to protect and serve, according to this document, were reporting to this group, the so called “AOEC”, feeding them intelligence so they would know when and where to escalate violence.

PAGE 24 (NEXT AVAILABLE)

This page refers to the funding.  Who’s going to pay the rioters for their work on the op?

This page brings us back to D.A. Donnelly, as you can see the same Heading at the top of this page “POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.” Later on the page, near the sticky note, you can see his name mentioned again.

This section states that “disbursements,” payments, are all subject to review and approval from Donnelly. Turns out D.A. Donnelly does not mean District Attorney, in fact D.A. we can reasonably assume, are his first two initials.  David Donnelly the TREASURER of “FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY” as you can see here.  It is pretty important, I suppose, to make it perfectly clear to keep quiet about who is funding such an illegal operation, that involves bribery at it’s highest level AND tax evasion.

The second to last paragraph then states in bold caps “DO NOT REPORT THIS INCOME TO ANYBODY.” The document claims that all payments have been coordinated with relevant tax authorities (one can only imagine who that may be) and accounting firms to make sure that all funding is distributed through appropriate channels to preserve “opsec” (an intelligence term for “operational security”).

This shows us that the op goes even deeper, as “Tax authorities” (IRS?) were used to hide, “launder”, the money to the operators. Based on the sticky note on the side of this page, we are talking about a large amount of money being funneled through this organization and out to the operatives.  Which would lead one to believe that the highest level of “tax authorities” are involved.

THIS is how Soros and company remain under the radar when paying for these ops in the US.  They “own” the Tax authorities which allows them to funnel money, “un-detected,” from their organizations down the chain of command to the operatives.

Finally the last thing that stands out on this final page of the document (available) is the last line. “As with previous FOD (friends of democracy) actions…” This tells us, that this is not the first time this organization has implemented this militant style op on OUR american soil.

PART 2
THE IMPLICATION

The Baltimore riots of 2015 left 113 police officers injured, 2 people shot and one fire victim in critical condition. 486 citizens were arrested. Of that number it is unclear how many were prosecuted to the full extent of the law. The corruption didn’t end with local or state LE. 

We even saw the Mayor of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (was she more than likely compensated for her actions?) issue an order for police to stand down. Imagine that? The mayor of a major US city, tells law enforcement to stand down and allow RIOTING, destruction of property, and violence to reign supreme in her city. Read more on this pathetic woman’s actions here. Aside from the injuries and arrests the city of Baltimore saw an estimated $20 Million in damages.

This type of operation could not have been planned out and executed by an average person.  The person who wrote this document clearly had either military/intelligence affiliation or training. I can assume this because of words like “comms”, “OPS”, “AUXOPS” “OPSEC”, “confidential level 7”, “328BG”, and all of the various acronyms used.

This operation was run like a covert military op and has a striking resemblance to the CIA 1953 Iran coup to remove Prime Minister Mossadegh from power.  The mastermind behind the coup, CIA Operative Kermit Roosevelt, used this EXACT method to divide the people of Tehran, to give the appearance that PM Mossadegh had lost control of the people.  Roosevelt also bought the media, spreading disinformation across Iran, stating that Mossadegh was a communist. A biased media, and the illusion of civil unrest was enough for the coup to take root and eventually be successful in Iran.

Does that not strike a very similar chord as to what is going on here in the US today? Are we not suffering from an incredibly biased, bought and paid for, media (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC etc.) that spreads disinformation about our democratically elected official? Calling him just about every name in the book. Do we now have evidence of, what appears to be, a Kermit Roosevelt style attempt at creating civil unrest for political gain? Is there an active attempt at a coup going on in our country? If so, it is embedded deep within our legal system as well as our financial system.

Is this page one of the handbook on how to overthrow a democratically elected government, control the media, create civil unrest?  You have the information, you be the judge.

Read More: https://news.unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/friends-of-democracy-funded-planned-baltimore-riots/

George Soros’s $18 Billion Tax Shelter

That’s $18 billion in globalist, corporatist propaganda that will be coming through the airwaves, web, print and in the form of paid protests.

Most of this won’t be directly attributed to Soros, but to a bunch of organizations and foundations that are funded by his donations and directed by his agenda, behind-the-scenes.

The people have our work cut out for us when a single individual has this much power to covertly influence society for his own profit and agenda.

George Soros quote: "Deliberately misleading propaganda techniques can destroy an open society."

Congress is still scrambling to find ways to pay for its tax cut, so perhaps it should pay closer attention to last month’s news that George Soros had transferred $18 billion of his fortune to a private charity that he controls. There it will be sheltered from the Internal Revenue Service forever. This may be the single biggest tax dodge in U.S. history, yet no one on the right or left seems to have raised an eyebrow.

True tax reform is predicated on the principle that all income should be taxed at a low rate once, and only once. But much of the wealth that Mr. Soros spent years moving into his Open Society Foundations will never be taxed. A gift of billions of dollars of appreciated stock escapes any capital gains tax, and the estate tax as well. So Mr. Soros can donate appreciated stock that Open Society Foundations can liquidate without the government ever taking a cut.

There’s more. When a person donates untaxed, appreciated assets to a private foundation, he may also deduct up to 20% of its market value on his personal return, carrying forward this deduction for five years. This double write-off may be the sweetest deal in the tax code.

The donors also can retain control of the money within the private foundation for years or even decades before it is disbursed. Since the foundation can employ family members at six-figure salaries for life to “administer” it, the umbilical cord to the donor never has to be cut.

Congress should stop ignoring this tax-avoidance scheme. The super rich have already poured hundreds of billions into private foundations, but the figure could soon be in the trillions. Mark Zuckerberg has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook shares, currently estimated to be worth somewhere around $70 billion, and much of it will go to a foundation his family controls. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have each put roughly $30 billion tax-free into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This has left the foundation so flush that it spent $500 million on a 12-acre, 900,000-square-foot office complex in Seattle for its 1,500 employees. This is philanthropy?

I don’t question these billionaires’ right to do with their money as they wish. I’m simply arguing that Congress shouldn’t let the rich and politically powerful use private foundations to escape taxation. This loophole is one reason for an anomaly in our otherwise progressive tax code: The top 1% of earners pay an effective tax rate of 23%, but the top 0.001% pay only 18%.

Mr. Buffett has sanctimoniously denounced the fact that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. His suggestion is that Congress raise taxes on capital gains. But even if the tax rates were lifted, say, to 50%, Mr. Buffett still wouldn’t have to pay it on the tens of billions of dollars he puts into private foundations, and he would still be able to deduct a fifth of that contribution on future tax returns.

This tax favoritism might be defensible to promote genuine philanthropic activities.

Many billionaires, such as the Gateses and David Koch, have heroically donated to fight cancer and malaria or provide relief to hurricane and earthquake victims.

But others, including Mr. Soros and Michael Bloomberg, have turned private foundations into massive de facto lobbying operations for bigger government and liberal causes like higher minimum wages, gun control, universal health care, and a carbon tax. Mr. Soros’s $18 billion gift alone is the equivalent of maybe 100 Heritage Foundations. This kind of weaponized philanthropy has the potential to undermine the American free enterprise system.

Yes, billions go to groups on the right, too, from Mr. Koch and others. But regardless of ideology, why shouldn’t tax be collected before the money is given away? What message does it send that the Republican tax-reform bills retain this trillion-dollar loophole for the super rich, at the same time as the House plan eliminates the adoption credit for middle-class families who want to help children?

One simple solution would be for Congress to apply the capital-gains tax to assets of more than $1 million before they are transferred to a charity. This could even finance cutting the capital-gains rate to 15% for everyone.

Alternatively (or perhaps in addition) Congress could cap deductions for any given household to $250,000 a year. Under this kind of plan, Mr. Soros would be able to write off only a tiny fraction of his multi-billion dollar gift.

This isn’t an argument against charity. But selfless and effective giving is not motivated by tax breaks. Two-thirds of Americans don’t itemize their deductions, yet millions give until it hurts. In the 1980s, individual donations to charities surged, even as the top tax rate—and thus the maximum value of the write-off—fell from 70% to 28%.

The question is whether a tax code that encourages dynastic family foundations is good for America. If Congress stopped letting billionaires pour money tax free into the foundation-industrial complex, it would go a long way toward lowering rates and making the tax code fairer for everyone. This would help the economy grow faster, which is the best way to help those in need.

 

Deep State Coup Crumbling as Trump’s Top Intelligence Official Caught Spying for George Soros

George Soros Quote: The US is the main obstacle to world order.

Trump’s top intelligence official authorized spying on Steve Bannon and Trump’s children—then sent the data to an intel facility owned by globalist George Soros.

Washington, D.C. – A member of the Trump transition team and former CIA paramilitary officer, John R. Maguire, reportedly revealed during a meeting prior to an intelligence-gathering operation in Afghanistan, that President Trump’s National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster—the highest-ranking intelligence official in the U.S. government—“authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump,” then proceeded to send the collected data to a surveillance facility in Cyprus owned by billionaire globalist George Soros, according to The Gateway Pundit.

Additionally, according to a report by The Intercept:

“[Maguire] said there were people inside the CIA who joined in the previous eight years [under Obama] and inside the government and they were failing to give the president the intelligence he needed,” said a person who was pitched by Maguire and other Amyntor personnel. To support his claim, Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R. McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.

For those unfamiliar with Soros, he is a champion of progressive causes globally and funds his Open Society Foundation to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. Although operating under the guise of a global philanthropist, Soros works to fund NGOs as a means of destabilizing targeted governments.

This is not the first time a McMaster-Soros connection has been exposed, as back in August, we reported that news out of Israel revealed that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster is working as an inside operative for globalist billionaire George Soros, according to a number of domestic and foreign intelligence sources.

“I have confirmed from sources from inside the White House, the Israeli government and Israeli intelligence that the Israelis have intercepted email communications from General McMaster to George Soros, informing him of everything that’s going on inside the White House,” reported longtime political operative Roger Stone. “…I have double checked this with two different sources very high up in Israeli intelligence, and I actually expect the Israeli ambassador to the US to confirm this.”

Interestingly, when Trump visited Israel on his first overseas trip, McMaster was curiously excluded from the meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his national security team, which broke from standard protocol.

According to Kafe Knesset, Trump met with Netanyahu, starting with a one-on-one meeting. The forum was soon expanded by several advisors on each side, including Jared Kushner, Jason Greenblatt and Ambassador David Friedman on the U.S. side, according to Israeli officials.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was later invited into the meeting, per an official, but “McMaster sat outside the King David room during the course of the entire meeting.”

One former U.S. officials told Kafe Knesset that the national security advisor’s exclusion from the meeting was “highly unusual.”

“For the President to prioritize his son-in-law and his lawyer over the National Security Advisor for these kind of strategic discussions is unconventional, to say the least,” an official said.

Now, perhaps we know why.

According to an investigation by Breitbart:

The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster is listed as being a member for eleven years, this week added George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and another Soros-financed group to the list of donors on its website in response to a Breitbart News request on the matter.

 

From September 2006 to February 2017, McMaster is listed as a member of International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where he served as consulting senior fellow. The IISS describes itself as a “world-leading authority on global security, political risk and military conflict.”

Back in July, Israel publicly accused Soros of attempting to continuously destabilize legitimately elected governments to forward his own agenda. With these latest revelations, it has become clear that McMaster has become one of the main conduits for strategic leaks to the mainstream media—in an effort to undermine Trump’s foreign policy goals.

READ MORE:  Anti-Russia Sanctions Will Destroy US Petrodollar & the Economy—Get Ready for $10 Gas

Soros’ infiltration of the National Security Council began with operative Fiona Hill, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Soros-funded Eurasia Foundation, in May of this year.

“George Soros has penetrated the Trump White House,” Stone reported. “Soros has planted a mole infiltrating the National Security apparatus: a woman named Fiona Hill, who has a Harvard background, and has been on the Soros payroll and the payroll of the Open Society Institute.”

Previously, Hill had assisted the Soros-founded Central European University in Hungary to attempt to influence Hungarian government policy, as the government has steadfastly attempted to rebuff Soros’ interference while refusing to abide by EU migrant quotas.

Earlier this year, journalist Mike Cernovich engaged in a full-frontal assault on McMaster as a globalist puppet and exposed numerous troubling revelations:

H.R. McMaster recently hired two of Ben Rhodes’ closest allies at NSC. Ben Rhodes is under investigation as part of the Susan Rice spying scandal.

McMaster refuses to get rid of Obama holdovers who spied on Trump.

Derek Harvey was the key figure when it came to the Middle East. He tried to force out the Obama holdovers running U.S foreign policy and he was sacked.

McMaster fired Rich Higgins for writing a memo criticizing Islamic terrorism.

Pro-Trump supporters removed from the NSC include Tara Dahl, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Robin Townley, Derek Harvey, and Adam Lovinger.

The Trump administration is reportedly considering a proposal by Maguire and Blackwater founder Erik Prince to create a privatized global spy network that would operate outside the standard intelligence bureaucracy as a means of circumventing what the White House believes is unreliable and politically tainted intelligence. If you thought the CIA was bad, imagine an intelligence network ran by one of the most murderous groups of mercenaries in the history of the world.

There is general recognition within the Trump administration that there is a deep state soft coup being carried out, which began under the Obama administration. There was intense political espionage carried out on the Trump campaign under the guise of a national security investigation using the fallacious Russia dossier, paid for by the Clinton/DNC camp, as “evidence” to gain surveillance warrants on team Trump in the FISA court.

Essentially, the U.S. intel apparatus was deeply complicit in political espionage carried out by the Obama administration against the opposition party’s most powerful candidate, and the administration is now considering ways to circumvent being the recipient of cooked intelligence.

It is important to note that simply reporting on this coup against Trump is not an endorsement of his policies but is merely done to expose the powers that be.

A former senior U.S. intelligence official with firsthand knowledge of the reported proposals said:

(CIA Director) Pompeo can’t trust the CIA bureaucracy, so we need to create this thing that reports just directly to him. It is a direct-action arm, totally off the books. The whole point is this is supposed to report to the president and Pompeo directly.

A source reportedly told The Intercept that the plans were pitched to the White House as a means of countering “deep state” enemies in the intelligence community seeking to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency.

Two former senior intelligence officials told The Intercept that Pompeo has embraced the plan and lobbied the White House to approve the contract.

When asked for comment, a CIA spokesperson reportedly told The Intercept, “You have been provided wildly inaccurate information by people peddling an agenda.”

The irony of the CIA’s statement is uncanny.

In review, we have a rogue American intelligence apparatus colluding with a globalist billionaire and his political minions to take down the elected President of the United States, with the White House considering creating a privatized intelligence agency to circumvent what it sees as unreliable and tainted intelligence.

What could go wrong?!

Far from operating as a bastion of liberal western democracy, the attempted coup taking place has clearly exposed the U.S. as being nothing more than an illiberal 3rd-world banana republic operating with a simple facade of freedom and justice.

Read More: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/deep-state-coup-begins-unravel-trumps-top-intelligence-official-busted-sending-intel-george-soros/

Net Neutrality – The End Of Google’s Biggest Subsidy

do no evil

DECEMBER 16, 2017 / TOM LUONGO

Net Neutrality is gone.  Good riddance.

Lost in all of the theoretical debate about how evil ISPs will create a have/have-not divide in Internet access, is the reality that it already exists along with massive subsidies to the biggest bandwidth pigs on the planet – Facebook, Google, Twitter, Netflix and the porn industry.

Under Net Neutrality these platforms flourished along with the rise of the mobile internet, which is now arguably more important than the ‘desktop’ one in your home and office.  Google and Apple control the on-ramps to the mobile web in a way that Net Neutrality proponents can only dream the bandwidth providers like Comcast and AT&T could.

Because, in truth, they can’t.  Consumers are ultimately the ones who decide how much bandwidth costs, not the ISPs.  We decide how much we can afford these creature comforts like streaming Netflix while riding the bus or doing self-indulgent Instagram videos of our standing in line at the movies (if that’s even a thing anymore).

Non-Neutrality Pricing

Net Neutrality took pricing of bandwidth out of the hands of consumers.  It handed the profits from it to Google, Facebook and all the crappy advertisers spamming video ads, malware, scams, and the like everywhere.

By mandating ‘equal access’ and equal fee structures the advertisers behind Google and Facebook would spend their budgets without much thought or care.  Google and Facebook ad revenue soared under Net Neutrality because advertisers’ needs are not aligned with Google’s bottom line, but with consumers’.

And, because of that, the price paid to deliver the ad, i.e. Google’s cost of goods sold (COGS), thanks to Net Neutrality, was held artificially low.  And Google, Facebook and the Porn Industry pocketed the difference.

They grew uncontrollably.  In the case of Google and Facebook, uncontrollably powerful.

That difference was never passed onto the ISP who could then, in turn, pass it on to the consumer.

All thanks to Net Neutrality.

Undercapitalized Growth

With the rise of the mobile web bandwidth should have been getting cheaper and easier to acquire at a much faster rate than it has.  But, it couldn’t because of Net Neutrality.  It kept rates of return on new bandwidth projects and new technology suppressed.

Money the ISP’s should have been spending laying more fiber, putting up more cell towers, building better radios went to Google to fritter away on endless projects that never see the light of day.

The ISP’s actually suffered under Net Neutrality and so did the consumers.

And therefore, Net Neutrality guaranteed that the infrastructure for new high-speed bandwidth would grow at the slowest possible rate, still governed by the maximum the consumer was willing to pay for bandwidth, rather than what the consumer actually demanded.

And, once obtained that power was then used to punish anyone who held different opinions from the leadership in Silicon Valley.

Think it through, Net Neutrality not only subsidized intrusive advertising, phishing scams and on-demand porn but also the very censorship these powerful companies now feel is their sacred duty to enforce because the government is now controlled by the bad guys.

Getting rid of Net Neutrality will put the costs of delivering all of this worthless content back onto the people serving it.  YouTube will become more expensive for Google and all of the other content delivery networks.  Facebook video will eat into its bottom line.

The ISP’s can and should throttle them until they ‘pay their fair share,’ which they plainly have not been.

The Net effect of Net Neutrality is that your ISP may charge you more in the short run for Netflix or Hulu.  Or, more appropriately, Netflix and Hulu will have to charge you more and we’ll find out what the real cost of delivering 4k streaming content to your iPhone actually costs.

But, those costs will then go to the ISP’s such that they can respond to demand for more bandwidth.  Will they try and overcharge us?  Of course.  AT&T is just as bad as Google and/or Facebook.

But, we have the right to say no.  To stop using the services the way Net Neutrality encouraged us to through mispricing of service.  If the ISP’s want more customers then they’ll have to bring wire out to the hinterlands.

Inflated Costs, Poor Service

Net Neutrality proponents kept telling us this was the way to help keep the internet available to the poor and the rural.  Nonsense.  It kept the internet from expanding properly into the hinterlands.

I live just over the county line in rural North Florida.  To the south is a town with cable and DSL.   Between cable franchise monopolies retarding expansion across county lines and Net Neutrality keeping margins thin, my home was 10 years behind everyone else getting decent bandwidth to keep up with the needs of the modern Internet.

Bandwidth needs artificially inflated, I might add, by the misaligned cost structure engendered by Net Neutrality in the first place.

It took forever for my phone provider to upgrade the bandwidth across the county line.  I begged them for a second line for internet service, they wouldn’t even talk to me.  Why?  The return on that new line wasn’t high enough for them.

If Google was passing some of the profits from Adwords onto the ISPs I’d have multiple choices for high-speed internet versus just one DSL provider.

As always, whenever the political left tries to protect the poor they wind up making things worse for them.

The Ways Forward

The news is good for a variety of reasons. With Net Neutrality gone a major barrier to entry for content delivery networks is gone.

Blockchain companies are building systems which cut the middle man out completely, allowing content creators to be directly tipped for their work versus being supported by advertising no one watches, wants or is swayed by.

Services like Steemit and the distributed application already built and to be built on it point the way to social media cost models which are sustainable and align the incentives properly between producers of content and consumers.

Steem internalizes the bandwidth costs of using the network and pays itself a part of its token reward pool to cover those costs.  So, all that’s left is content producer and their fans.  Advertisers are simply not needed to maintain the network.

Net Neutrality was a trojan horse designed to replicate the old shout-based advertising model of the golden age of print and TV advertising.  It was a way to control the megaphone and promote a particular point of view.

Look no further than the main proponents of it.  George Soros and the Ford Foundation are two of the biggest lobbyists for Net Neutrality.  Only the political left and its Marxian fantasies of evil middle men creating monopolies fell for the lies, as they were supposed to.

The rest of us were like, “Really?  This is not a problem.”  And it wasn’t until you looked under the hood and realized all they stood to gain by it.

Now, with Net Neutrality gone the underlying problem can be addressed; franchise monopolies of cable and phone companies in geographic areas.  These laws are still in effect.  They still hang like a spectre over the entire industry.  Like Net Neutrality, these laws concentrate capital into the hands of the few providers big enough to keep out the competition.

So, instead of championing the end of franchise monopolies, which county governments love because they get a sizable cut of the revenue to fund non-essential programs, the Left made things worse by championing Net Neutrality.

That also needs to end.  Even if you believe that franchise monopolies were, at one point, necessary.  They are not now.  IP-based communication is now fundamentally different than copper wire for discrete services like phone and cable.  Let people run all the copper and fiber they want.  There’s plenty of room in the conduit running under our sidewalks and streets.

Let a thousand flowers bloom, as the great Lew Rockwell once told me.

Then and only then will the Internet be free.

Read More: https://tomluongo.me/2017/12/16/net-neutrality-the-end-of-googles-biggest-subsidy/