Documents Prove Riots are Soros Funded and Directed

Well, now we have it. Documented evidence that a Soros-backed PAC was covertly organizing, busing and paying people to pose as protesters AND had an agreement with some local law enforcement officials to allow riots to occur.

This is terrorism. 

From Instructor Craig at Uncle Sams Misguided

Soros Funded Baltimore Riots


A document was found marked “confidential” – it is a clear set of guidelines and instructions written for paid protesters in Baltimore. You may recall LARGE protests broke out in Baltimore shortly after the April 15th, 2015 death of Freddie Gray. There has long been rumor and ‘conspiracy theory’ that all of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organizing and rioting was funded by special interest groups, namely, George Soros.  Do we now FINALLY have proof of that claim with documents labeled as from ‘Friends of Democracy?’  You be the judge as I break down each page of this document.

This article dives into what appears to be DEEPLY rooted corruption among Baltimore officials, law enforcement (LE) and even Tax Authorities (state? federal?).  The documents in question also seem to implicate someone with ties to US Intelligence or US military.


You can clearly see the “Friends of Democracy” letterhead on the top left.  “Friends of Democracy” is owned by, none other than, Jonathan Soros, son of billionaire and liberal financier George Soros. This article will explain everything you need to know about the Super- PAC that is “Friends of Democracy.”

On the top right of the document you can see a “Confidential level 7” tag. This tells me US government intelligence involvement, or that some one with US government Confidentiality Classifications knowledge is attached to this document.  Here is an publication on US government security classifications.  I have taken the liberty to cut the “Confidential Information” portion and post it here as a photo.

Confidential 7, Mobilization plans, I would say that would fit the description of what this document is…Mobilization plans.

Three other things really stand out on this front page.

  • The goal is “to seize as much momentum as possible from current civil unrest in the BWI (Baltimore/Washington International) area”
  • The mention of “friendly officials.” Are these the bought and paid for LE and BWI officials?.
  • This is a paid function and they desperately want to keep that secret “**DO NOT discuss the distribution or fulfillment of funds during the action.”

Lastly we can address the note jotted down in the top right corner that says, “Make sure to also get index from OSI.”  What is OSI? OSI stands for the “Open Society Institute” which is now called the “Open Society Foundation” and was founded by George Soros according to wikipedia.  Further tying George Soros, and his seemingly “philanthropic” organizations, to military-like actions on US soil, where the goal is to create civil unrest.  This has long been a conspiracy theory, now we have documents to connect the dots. Does George Soros use his organizations as a means to funnel money into illegal activities for political gain?


Shows the mobilization points for different sects of paid rioters, the routes to take to the “demonstration”, and the demobilization route.

Note the first paragraph under the map.  “These routes have been guaranteed by friendly BWI officials and LE as safe for ops and auxops.” This points even more clearly to how deep this operation ran.  BWI officials and Law Enforcement were both made “friendly”, or for a more direct term, were they paid off?

The second paragraph shows possible military/ex-military or intelligence involvement as well.  The term “comms,” though easily understood and commonly used, does come from military, but what strikes me more is the referral to 328BG.  328BG is nothing more than a model of tracfone, an LG tracfone to be exact. Why is this relevant? Again, this is how the military refers to equipment. By model number.


This page goes over “legal” and the overall objectives of the operation. READ CAREFULLY.

The top of this page represents just how deep the op went.  AOEC has a well established chain of command, medics and most importantly they had been cleared to break the law and be violent.  The final paragraph of the top portion states clearly that BWI officials and Law Enforcement issued protections to participants of the operation, allowing them to be violent.  Yes, you saw that correctly LAW ENFORCEMENT and  Baltimore officials allowing violence in the streets. Was it for political gain?  What can’t money buy? The activities allowed are mapped out on the next page.  But, lest we get ahead of ourselves, let’s go over the bottom portion of page 12.

The objectives of the operation, Primary, Secondary, Tertiary (third), and IDEAL. Primary goals are to provoke “hostile” LE and BWI Officials.  By hostile they mean the honest people that couldn’t be bought. It is in the “secondary” and “ideal” objectives that you see the big picture.  The op is all about, “creating an envioronment where organic CONFLICT can grow,” they want to inspire organic actions across the nation, and they want martial-law-like policies to be effected. These goals are very important to keep in mind as we progress.


This page describes how the paid rioters should act during the op.  Including what types of violence can be used and when it is permitted.

Things of note. Well, there is one HUGELY important sentence on this page.

“POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.”  Who is D.A. Donnelly? Why is it so important to hide his involvement? Is he the District Attorney? We will revisit this soon.

Operators on this page are instructed not to use any props during the op, “unless locals have already begun to do so,” in which case using any “small blunt object” (bottles, rocks, etc) was deemed to be permissible. Remember, Law Enforcement is clearly involved in this op and they are allowing the use of blunt objects and violence to incite none operatives to do the same.

Under “General Behavior” notice the very last statement in bold, “STICK TO YOUR PERSONALITY PROFILE ASSIGNMENT.” This shows you just how advanced and well planned this op actually is.  Directors will do this with extras in a movie to add dynamics and to create an authentic feel. For example in a movie where there is a shootout, some of the extras will have an assignment to flee, others to hide, some to scream and others to be silent. Like a movie, this op was orchestrated to have an organic feel.  Giving the operators personality assignments ensures this.

The very last section “aggressiveness” drives home how involved/corrupt LE was. The doc says not to engage with friendly LE as “they have been instructed merely to not engage, they have NOT been told to assist.”  Also in this section is something scary. Some local LE were actually reporting to AOEC, according to the document.

“Remember timing and assignment of escalations is determined by conditions on the ground and intelligence from LEs channeled through AOEC.”  Let that sink in. Some officers sworn to protect and serve, according to this document, were reporting to this group, the so called “AOEC”, feeding them intelligence so they would know when and where to escalate violence.


This page refers to the funding.  Who’s going to pay the rioters for their work on the op?

This page brings us back to D.A. Donnelly, as you can see the same Heading at the top of this page “POINT OF CONTACT: D.A. Donnelly – DO NOT name this individual in any comms or in person. THIS DOES NOT LEAVE THIS DOCUMENT.” Later on the page, near the sticky note, you can see his name mentioned again.

This section states that “disbursements,” payments, are all subject to review and approval from Donnelly. Turns out D.A. Donnelly does not mean District Attorney, in fact D.A. we can reasonably assume, are his first two initials.  David Donnelly the TREASURER of “FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY” as you can see here.  It is pretty important, I suppose, to make it perfectly clear to keep quiet about who is funding such an illegal operation, that involves bribery at it’s highest level AND tax evasion.

The second to last paragraph then states in bold caps “DO NOT REPORT THIS INCOME TO ANYBODY.” The document claims that all payments have been coordinated with relevant tax authorities (one can only imagine who that may be) and accounting firms to make sure that all funding is distributed through appropriate channels to preserve “opsec” (an intelligence term for “operational security”).

This shows us that the op goes even deeper, as “Tax authorities” (IRS?) were used to hide, “launder”, the money to the operators. Based on the sticky note on the side of this page, we are talking about a large amount of money being funneled through this organization and out to the operatives.  Which would lead one to believe that the highest level of “tax authorities” are involved.

THIS is how Soros and company remain under the radar when paying for these ops in the US.  They “own” the Tax authorities which allows them to funnel money, “un-detected,” from their organizations down the chain of command to the operatives.

Finally the last thing that stands out on this final page of the document (available) is the last line. “As with previous FOD (friends of democracy) actions…” This tells us, that this is not the first time this organization has implemented this militant style op on OUR american soil.


The Baltimore riots of 2015 left 113 police officers injured, 2 people shot and one fire victim in critical condition. 486 citizens were arrested. Of that number it is unclear how many were prosecuted to the full extent of the law. The corruption didn’t end with local or state LE. 

We even saw the Mayor of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (was she more than likely compensated for her actions?) issue an order for police to stand down. Imagine that? The mayor of a major US city, tells law enforcement to stand down and allow RIOTING, destruction of property, and violence to reign supreme in her city. Read more on this pathetic woman’s actions here. Aside from the injuries and arrests the city of Baltimore saw an estimated $20 Million in damages.

This type of operation could not have been planned out and executed by an average person.  The person who wrote this document clearly had either military/intelligence affiliation or training. I can assume this because of words like “comms”, “OPS”, “AUXOPS” “OPSEC”, “confidential level 7”, “328BG”, and all of the various acronyms used.

This operation was run like a covert military op and has a striking resemblance to the CIA 1953 Iran coup to remove Prime Minister Mossadegh from power.  The mastermind behind the coup, CIA Operative Kermit Roosevelt, used this EXACT method to divide the people of Tehran, to give the appearance that PM Mossadegh had lost control of the people.  Roosevelt also bought the media, spreading disinformation across Iran, stating that Mossadegh was a communist. A biased media, and the illusion of civil unrest was enough for the coup to take root and eventually be successful in Iran.

Does that not strike a very similar chord as to what is going on here in the US today? Are we not suffering from an incredibly biased, bought and paid for, media (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC etc.) that spreads disinformation about our democratically elected official? Calling him just about every name in the book. Do we now have evidence of, what appears to be, a Kermit Roosevelt style attempt at creating civil unrest for political gain? Is there an active attempt at a coup going on in our country? If so, it is embedded deep within our legal system as well as our financial system.

Is this page one of the handbook on how to overthrow a democratically elected government, control the media, create civil unrest?  You have the information, you be the judge.

Read More:

George Soros’s $18 Billion Tax Shelter

That’s $18 billion in globalist, corporatist propaganda that will be coming through the airwaves, web, print and in the form of paid protests.

Most of this won’t be directly attributed to Soros, but to a bunch of organizations and foundations that are funded by his donations and directed by his agenda, behind-the-scenes.

The people have our work cut out for us when a single individual has this much power to covertly influence society for his own profit and agenda.

George Soros quote: "Deliberately misleading propaganda techniques can destroy an open society."

Congress is still scrambling to find ways to pay for its tax cut, so perhaps it should pay closer attention to last month’s news that George Soros had transferred $18 billion of his fortune to a private charity that he controls. There it will be sheltered from the Internal Revenue Service forever. This may be the single biggest tax dodge in U.S. history, yet no one on the right or left seems to have raised an eyebrow.

True tax reform is predicated on the principle that all income should be taxed at a low rate once, and only once. But much of the wealth that Mr. Soros spent years moving into his Open Society Foundations will never be taxed. A gift of billions of dollars of appreciated stock escapes any capital gains tax, and the estate tax as well. So Mr. Soros can donate appreciated stock that Open Society Foundations can liquidate without the government ever taking a cut.

There’s more. When a person donates untaxed, appreciated assets to a private foundation, he may also deduct up to 20% of its market value on his personal return, carrying forward this deduction for five years. This double write-off may be the sweetest deal in the tax code.

The donors also can retain control of the money within the private foundation for years or even decades before it is disbursed. Since the foundation can employ family members at six-figure salaries for life to “administer” it, the umbilical cord to the donor never has to be cut.

Congress should stop ignoring this tax-avoidance scheme. The super rich have already poured hundreds of billions into private foundations, but the figure could soon be in the trillions. Mark Zuckerberg has pledged to give away 99% of his Facebook shares, currently estimated to be worth somewhere around $70 billion, and much of it will go to a foundation his family controls. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have each put roughly $30 billion tax-free into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This has left the foundation so flush that it spent $500 million on a 12-acre, 900,000-square-foot office complex in Seattle for its 1,500 employees. This is philanthropy?

I don’t question these billionaires’ right to do with their money as they wish. I’m simply arguing that Congress shouldn’t let the rich and politically powerful use private foundations to escape taxation. This loophole is one reason for an anomaly in our otherwise progressive tax code: The top 1% of earners pay an effective tax rate of 23%, but the top 0.001% pay only 18%.

Mr. Buffett has sanctimoniously denounced the fact that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. His suggestion is that Congress raise taxes on capital gains. But even if the tax rates were lifted, say, to 50%, Mr. Buffett still wouldn’t have to pay it on the tens of billions of dollars he puts into private foundations, and he would still be able to deduct a fifth of that contribution on future tax returns.

This tax favoritism might be defensible to promote genuine philanthropic activities.

Many billionaires, such as the Gateses and David Koch, have heroically donated to fight cancer and malaria or provide relief to hurricane and earthquake victims.

But others, including Mr. Soros and Michael Bloomberg, have turned private foundations into massive de facto lobbying operations for bigger government and liberal causes like higher minimum wages, gun control, universal health care, and a carbon tax. Mr. Soros’s $18 billion gift alone is the equivalent of maybe 100 Heritage Foundations. This kind of weaponized philanthropy has the potential to undermine the American free enterprise system.

Yes, billions go to groups on the right, too, from Mr. Koch and others. But regardless of ideology, why shouldn’t tax be collected before the money is given away? What message does it send that the Republican tax-reform bills retain this trillion-dollar loophole for the super rich, at the same time as the House plan eliminates the adoption credit for middle-class families who want to help children?

One simple solution would be for Congress to apply the capital-gains tax to assets of more than $1 million before they are transferred to a charity. This could even finance cutting the capital-gains rate to 15% for everyone.

Alternatively (or perhaps in addition) Congress could cap deductions for any given household to $250,000 a year. Under this kind of plan, Mr. Soros would be able to write off only a tiny fraction of his multi-billion dollar gift.

This isn’t an argument against charity. But selfless and effective giving is not motivated by tax breaks. Two-thirds of Americans don’t itemize their deductions, yet millions give until it hurts. In the 1980s, individual donations to charities surged, even as the top tax rate—and thus the maximum value of the write-off—fell from 70% to 28%.

The question is whether a tax code that encourages dynastic family foundations is good for America. If Congress stopped letting billionaires pour money tax free into the foundation-industrial complex, it would go a long way toward lowering rates and making the tax code fairer for everyone. This would help the economy grow faster, which is the best way to help those in need.


Deep State Coup Crumbling as Trump’s Top Intelligence Official Caught Spying for George Soros

George Soros Quote: The US is the main obstacle to world order.

Trump’s top intelligence official authorized spying on Steve Bannon and Trump’s children—then sent the data to an intel facility owned by globalist George Soros.

Washington, D.C. – A member of the Trump transition team and former CIA paramilitary officer, John R. Maguire, reportedly revealed during a meeting prior to an intelligence-gathering operation in Afghanistan, that President Trump’s National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster—the highest-ranking intelligence official in the U.S. government—“authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump,” then proceeded to send the collected data to a surveillance facility in Cyprus owned by billionaire globalist George Soros, according to The Gateway Pundit.

Additionally, according to a report by The Intercept:

“[Maguire] said there were people inside the CIA who joined in the previous eight years [under Obama] and inside the government and they were failing to give the president the intelligence he needed,” said a person who was pitched by Maguire and other Amyntor personnel. To support his claim, Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R. McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.

For those unfamiliar with Soros, he is a champion of progressive causes globally and funds his Open Society Foundation to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. Although operating under the guise of a global philanthropist, Soros works to fund NGOs as a means of destabilizing targeted governments.

This is not the first time a McMaster-Soros connection has been exposed, as back in August, we reported that news out of Israel revealed that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster is working as an inside operative for globalist billionaire George Soros, according to a number of domestic and foreign intelligence sources.

“I have confirmed from sources from inside the White House, the Israeli government and Israeli intelligence that the Israelis have intercepted email communications from General McMaster to George Soros, informing him of everything that’s going on inside the White House,” reported longtime political operative Roger Stone. “…I have double checked this with two different sources very high up in Israeli intelligence, and I actually expect the Israeli ambassador to the US to confirm this.”

Interestingly, when Trump visited Israel on his first overseas trip, McMaster was curiously excluded from the meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his national security team, which broke from standard protocol.

According to Kafe Knesset, Trump met with Netanyahu, starting with a one-on-one meeting. The forum was soon expanded by several advisors on each side, including Jared Kushner, Jason Greenblatt and Ambassador David Friedman on the U.S. side, according to Israeli officials.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was later invited into the meeting, per an official, but “McMaster sat outside the King David room during the course of the entire meeting.”

One former U.S. officials told Kafe Knesset that the national security advisor’s exclusion from the meeting was “highly unusual.”

“For the President to prioritize his son-in-law and his lawyer over the National Security Advisor for these kind of strategic discussions is unconventional, to say the least,” an official said.

Now, perhaps we know why.

According to an investigation by Breitbart:

The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster is listed as being a member for eleven years, this week added George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and another Soros-financed group to the list of donors on its website in response to a Breitbart News request on the matter.


From September 2006 to February 2017, McMaster is listed as a member of International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where he served as consulting senior fellow. The IISS describes itself as a “world-leading authority on global security, political risk and military conflict.”

Back in July, Israel publicly accused Soros of attempting to continuously destabilize legitimately elected governments to forward his own agenda. With these latest revelations, it has become clear that McMaster has become one of the main conduits for strategic leaks to the mainstream media—in an effort to undermine Trump’s foreign policy goals.

READ MORE:  Anti-Russia Sanctions Will Destroy US Petrodollar & the Economy—Get Ready for $10 Gas

Soros’ infiltration of the National Security Council began with operative Fiona Hill, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Soros-funded Eurasia Foundation, in May of this year.

“George Soros has penetrated the Trump White House,” Stone reported. “Soros has planted a mole infiltrating the National Security apparatus: a woman named Fiona Hill, who has a Harvard background, and has been on the Soros payroll and the payroll of the Open Society Institute.”

Previously, Hill had assisted the Soros-founded Central European University in Hungary to attempt to influence Hungarian government policy, as the government has steadfastly attempted to rebuff Soros’ interference while refusing to abide by EU migrant quotas.

Earlier this year, journalist Mike Cernovich engaged in a full-frontal assault on McMaster as a globalist puppet and exposed numerous troubling revelations:

H.R. McMaster recently hired two of Ben Rhodes’ closest allies at NSC. Ben Rhodes is under investigation as part of the Susan Rice spying scandal.

McMaster refuses to get rid of Obama holdovers who spied on Trump.

Derek Harvey was the key figure when it came to the Middle East. He tried to force out the Obama holdovers running U.S foreign policy and he was sacked.

McMaster fired Rich Higgins for writing a memo criticizing Islamic terrorism.

Pro-Trump supporters removed from the NSC include Tara Dahl, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Robin Townley, Derek Harvey, and Adam Lovinger.

The Trump administration is reportedly considering a proposal by Maguire and Blackwater founder Erik Prince to create a privatized global spy network that would operate outside the standard intelligence bureaucracy as a means of circumventing what the White House believes is unreliable and politically tainted intelligence. If you thought the CIA was bad, imagine an intelligence network ran by one of the most murderous groups of mercenaries in the history of the world.

There is general recognition within the Trump administration that there is a deep state soft coup being carried out, which began under the Obama administration. There was intense political espionage carried out on the Trump campaign under the guise of a national security investigation using the fallacious Russia dossier, paid for by the Clinton/DNC camp, as “evidence” to gain surveillance warrants on team Trump in the FISA court.

Essentially, the U.S. intel apparatus was deeply complicit in political espionage carried out by the Obama administration against the opposition party’s most powerful candidate, and the administration is now considering ways to circumvent being the recipient of cooked intelligence.

It is important to note that simply reporting on this coup against Trump is not an endorsement of his policies but is merely done to expose the powers that be.

A former senior U.S. intelligence official with firsthand knowledge of the reported proposals said:

(CIA Director) Pompeo can’t trust the CIA bureaucracy, so we need to create this thing that reports just directly to him. It is a direct-action arm, totally off the books. The whole point is this is supposed to report to the president and Pompeo directly.

A source reportedly told The Intercept that the plans were pitched to the White House as a means of countering “deep state” enemies in the intelligence community seeking to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency.

Two former senior intelligence officials told The Intercept that Pompeo has embraced the plan and lobbied the White House to approve the contract.

When asked for comment, a CIA spokesperson reportedly told The Intercept, “You have been provided wildly inaccurate information by people peddling an agenda.”

The irony of the CIA’s statement is uncanny.

In review, we have a rogue American intelligence apparatus colluding with a globalist billionaire and his political minions to take down the elected President of the United States, with the White House considering creating a privatized intelligence agency to circumvent what it sees as unreliable and tainted intelligence.

What could go wrong?!

Far from operating as a bastion of liberal western democracy, the attempted coup taking place has clearly exposed the U.S. as being nothing more than an illiberal 3rd-world banana republic operating with a simple facade of freedom and justice.

Read More:

Net Neutrality – The End Of Google’s Biggest Subsidy

do no evil


Net Neutrality is gone.  Good riddance.

Lost in all of the theoretical debate about how evil ISPs will create a have/have-not divide in Internet access, is the reality that it already exists along with massive subsidies to the biggest bandwidth pigs on the planet – Facebook, Google, Twitter, Netflix and the porn industry.

Under Net Neutrality these platforms flourished along with the rise of the mobile internet, which is now arguably more important than the ‘desktop’ one in your home and office.  Google and Apple control the on-ramps to the mobile web in a way that Net Neutrality proponents can only dream the bandwidth providers like Comcast and AT&T could.

Because, in truth, they can’t.  Consumers are ultimately the ones who decide how much bandwidth costs, not the ISPs.  We decide how much we can afford these creature comforts like streaming Netflix while riding the bus or doing self-indulgent Instagram videos of our standing in line at the movies (if that’s even a thing anymore).

Non-Neutrality Pricing

Net Neutrality took pricing of bandwidth out of the hands of consumers.  It handed the profits from it to Google, Facebook and all the crappy advertisers spamming video ads, malware, scams, and the like everywhere.

By mandating ‘equal access’ and equal fee structures the advertisers behind Google and Facebook would spend their budgets without much thought or care.  Google and Facebook ad revenue soared under Net Neutrality because advertisers’ needs are not aligned with Google’s bottom line, but with consumers’.

And, because of that, the price paid to deliver the ad, i.e. Google’s cost of goods sold (COGS), thanks to Net Neutrality, was held artificially low.  And Google, Facebook and the Porn Industry pocketed the difference.

They grew uncontrollably.  In the case of Google and Facebook, uncontrollably powerful.

That difference was never passed onto the ISP who could then, in turn, pass it on to the consumer.

All thanks to Net Neutrality.

Undercapitalized Growth

With the rise of the mobile web bandwidth should have been getting cheaper and easier to acquire at a much faster rate than it has.  But, it couldn’t because of Net Neutrality.  It kept rates of return on new bandwidth projects and new technology suppressed.

Money the ISP’s should have been spending laying more fiber, putting up more cell towers, building better radios went to Google to fritter away on endless projects that never see the light of day.

The ISP’s actually suffered under Net Neutrality and so did the consumers.

And therefore, Net Neutrality guaranteed that the infrastructure for new high-speed bandwidth would grow at the slowest possible rate, still governed by the maximum the consumer was willing to pay for bandwidth, rather than what the consumer actually demanded.

And, once obtained that power was then used to punish anyone who held different opinions from the leadership in Silicon Valley.

Think it through, Net Neutrality not only subsidized intrusive advertising, phishing scams and on-demand porn but also the very censorship these powerful companies now feel is their sacred duty to enforce because the government is now controlled by the bad guys.

Getting rid of Net Neutrality will put the costs of delivering all of this worthless content back onto the people serving it.  YouTube will become more expensive for Google and all of the other content delivery networks.  Facebook video will eat into its bottom line.

The ISP’s can and should throttle them until they ‘pay their fair share,’ which they plainly have not been.

The Net effect of Net Neutrality is that your ISP may charge you more in the short run for Netflix or Hulu.  Or, more appropriately, Netflix and Hulu will have to charge you more and we’ll find out what the real cost of delivering 4k streaming content to your iPhone actually costs.

But, those costs will then go to the ISP’s such that they can respond to demand for more bandwidth.  Will they try and overcharge us?  Of course.  AT&T is just as bad as Google and/or Facebook.

But, we have the right to say no.  To stop using the services the way Net Neutrality encouraged us to through mispricing of service.  If the ISP’s want more customers then they’ll have to bring wire out to the hinterlands.

Inflated Costs, Poor Service

Net Neutrality proponents kept telling us this was the way to help keep the internet available to the poor and the rural.  Nonsense.  It kept the internet from expanding properly into the hinterlands.

I live just over the county line in rural North Florida.  To the south is a town with cable and DSL.   Between cable franchise monopolies retarding expansion across county lines and Net Neutrality keeping margins thin, my home was 10 years behind everyone else getting decent bandwidth to keep up with the needs of the modern Internet.

Bandwidth needs artificially inflated, I might add, by the misaligned cost structure engendered by Net Neutrality in the first place.

It took forever for my phone provider to upgrade the bandwidth across the county line.  I begged them for a second line for internet service, they wouldn’t even talk to me.  Why?  The return on that new line wasn’t high enough for them.

If Google was passing some of the profits from Adwords onto the ISPs I’d have multiple choices for high-speed internet versus just one DSL provider.

As always, whenever the political left tries to protect the poor they wind up making things worse for them.

The Ways Forward

The news is good for a variety of reasons. With Net Neutrality gone a major barrier to entry for content delivery networks is gone.

Blockchain companies are building systems which cut the middle man out completely, allowing content creators to be directly tipped for their work versus being supported by advertising no one watches, wants or is swayed by.

Services like Steemit and the distributed application already built and to be built on it point the way to social media cost models which are sustainable and align the incentives properly between producers of content and consumers.

Steem internalizes the bandwidth costs of using the network and pays itself a part of its token reward pool to cover those costs.  So, all that’s left is content producer and their fans.  Advertisers are simply not needed to maintain the network.

Net Neutrality was a trojan horse designed to replicate the old shout-based advertising model of the golden age of print and TV advertising.  It was a way to control the megaphone and promote a particular point of view.

Look no further than the main proponents of it.  George Soros and the Ford Foundation are two of the biggest lobbyists for Net Neutrality.  Only the political left and its Marxian fantasies of evil middle men creating monopolies fell for the lies, as they were supposed to.

The rest of us were like, “Really?  This is not a problem.”  And it wasn’t until you looked under the hood and realized all they stood to gain by it.

Now, with Net Neutrality gone the underlying problem can be addressed; franchise monopolies of cable and phone companies in geographic areas.  These laws are still in effect.  They still hang like a spectre over the entire industry.  Like Net Neutrality, these laws concentrate capital into the hands of the few providers big enough to keep out the competition.

So, instead of championing the end of franchise monopolies, which county governments love because they get a sizable cut of the revenue to fund non-essential programs, the Left made things worse by championing Net Neutrality.

That also needs to end.  Even if you believe that franchise monopolies were, at one point, necessary.  They are not now.  IP-based communication is now fundamentally different than copper wire for discrete services like phone and cable.  Let people run all the copper and fiber they want.  There’s plenty of room in the conduit running under our sidewalks and streets.

Let a thousand flowers bloom, as the great Lew Rockwell once told me.

Then and only then will the Internet be free.

Read More:

Exposed: Clinton Train Paid The Young Turks $20 Million

Exposed: Clinton Train Paid The Young Turks $20 Million

n this week’s episode of Newsbud’s Spiro Reports, Spiro investigates the deep state’s role in influencing the so-called alternative media. Recently the Young Turks secured an investment deal for $20 million. You know what they say, follow the money! Find out what we discovered in this hard hitting Newsbud community exclusive as we uncover the shady powerful network within the Clinton train who is pulling the money strings for the Young Turks. Plus, find out what former FBI whistleblower and Newsbud Founder Sibel Edmonds had to say about the Young Turk front man only at

*Follow us here at Newsbud Twitter

**Subscribe here at BFP-Newsbud YouTube Channel

Show notes

Progressive media outlet The Young Turks has raised $20 million in venture-capital funding and plans to double its staff

The Media Consortium

Meet the New George Soros

3L Capital

Dave Leyrer’s Omaze Raises Money For Clinton Foundation

Hacked documents reveal Soros plans for more Internet regulation

Soros-Funded Lefty Media Reach More Than 300 Million Every Month

Don Gevirtz; Democratic Fund-Raiser

2010 Overview The Aspen Institute

Brookings Institute Attendee List

The “Partners”: Who’s Who in the Democracy Alliance

George Soros’s Democracy Alliance

Democracy Alliance

Security Tight at Secretive Democracy Alliance Meeting

Obama’s Top Fund-Raisers

WndrCo LLC

Global Development Council Alan Patricof 

Millenium Challenge Corporation Report

So many choices … from the Aspen Institute

Is Hillary Clinton still the one to beat in 2016?

Global development leaders offer suggestions for next US president

The Secret Masters

Jeffrey Katzenberg – news and investigations

With cash from Jeffrey Katzenberg, The Young Turks looks to grow paid subscribers


Social Engineering of Your Democracy: Brought to you by Self-Serving Billionaires and Corporations

George Soros Quote: The US is the main obstacle to world order.

What if they used their money to improve and help our society instead of divide it? …P.D.

From the comments section:

“You mean to tell me a rich, crotchedy, self-serving, WHITE, psychopath is fueling racial tensions? I am STUNNED! /sarc”

“There is something inherently suspicious about billionaires funding SJW causes. God forbid these billionaires would use their money to build factories or otherwise to take affirmative action (pun intended) to create or keep jobs in the US. Something that would provide tangible benefit for real people including especially those these billionaires claim to want to help. How many jobs has Ford sent overseas to increase executive bonuses? Instead, they give to groups who do nothing other than lead protests and incite division. Hmmm.”

Soros, Kellogg, Ford: Donor List Of Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’ Group Revealed | Zero Hedge

Soros, Kellogg, Ford: Donor List Of Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’ Group Revealed | Zero Hedge

The Center for Community Change Action (CCCA), a Washington, D.C.-based 501 (c)(3) progressive community organizing group and contributor to the anti-Trump “Resistance” movement, counts some of the most prominent American families among its impressive donor base.  Unfortunately, at least for those donors, their staggering contributions to the secretive group have just been revealed by The Washington Free Beacon and include massive multi-million dollar grants from George Soros, the Kellogg Foundation and the Ford Foundation, among others.

The Free Beacon has obtained the group’s unredacted 2015 tax forms that shed light on its funders, who provide millions of dollars in assistance. The group appears to rely heavily on a few major liberal foundations, organizations, and unions.

The Center for Community Change’s largest contribution was $3,000,000 from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, which was initially created by Will Kellogg, the food manufacturer and founder of Kellogg Company. The Ford Foundation, which was first created by the founders of the Ford Motor Company, added a $2,350,000 donation. The Open Society Foundation, a foundation run by liberal billionaire mega-donor George Soros, gave $1,750,000 to the Center for Community Change.

Other donors to the organization include the California Endowment, which gave $524,500;the Marquerite Casey Foundation, which gave $515,000; Fidelity Charitable Gift, which donated $505,100; and the National Immigration Law Center, which gave $316,000.

Of course, if you thought a $1.8 million contribution from a prominent, billionaire progressive like George Soros was a little stingy, you were right…that’s why he also contributed to CCCA’s various sister organizations, including a $1.5 million donation to their “Social Welfare” arm.

The Center for Community Change Action, the “social welfare” (c)(4) arm of the group, additionally relies on a handful of donors for almost all of its funding, according to its documents that do not include the privacy redactions.

Donors to its “social welfare” arm in 2015 included Every Citizen Counts ($1,750,000 contribution), a nonprofit that was created by allies of Hillary Clinton to mobilize Latino and African-American voters; the Open Society Policy Center ($1,475,000), another Soros group; the Sixteen Thirty Fund ($610,000), a progressive advocacy group; Center for Community Change ($150,000); Services Employees International Union (SEIU) ($150,000); Atlantic Philanthropies ($75,000); and the Tides Foundation ($50,000), the largest liberal donor-advised network, among other funders.

So what did CCCA spend all that money on? Well, if you guessed Black Lives Matter and “Sanctuary Campus” anti-Trump protests then you’re absolutely correct.

 The Emergent Fund gives grants ranging from $10,000 to $50,000 and has provided financing to Black Lives Matter; the Center for Media Justice, which was created to “organize the most under-represented communities in a national movement for media rights”; the Muslim Anti-Racism Collaborative; and United We Dream, the largest immigrant youth-led organization in the United States.

The Center for Community Change later joined United We Dream for nationwide immigration protests leading up to Trump’s inauguration. United We Dream was additionally behind“sanctuary campus” anti-Trump protests across the country to protect undocumented students.

Unfortunately, despite their best efforts, it appears that all of CCCA’s progressive activism was about as effective as the $1.2 billion that Hillary spent on her 2016 campaign.

Soros-sponsored immigration network in Italy | GEFIRA

Why is it cool and “progressive” for billionaires to fund revolutions and destabilization around the world so they can profit from failed states?

If there was ever a purpose for government I would think it would be to protect the people from billionaires paying to destabilize their country.

Oh, too late, and it’s even here now. They have been doing this around the world since the 50’s. Did anyone think this manufactured regime change wouldn’t come back home…? P.D.

Soros-sponsored immigration network in Italy

Why is there a migrant crisis in the Mediterranean? Why are NGOs involved? Because there is an extensive network of open borders activists and organizations behind it; many of them are directly funded by or cooperated with George Soros’ Open Society. Is it illegal? Not really. Political activism is an essential part of democratic societies. However, sometimes it goes too far, or the promoted causes prove to be either unrealistic or unsustainable.
The network of the “immigration lobby’’ in Italy is made up of International NGOs financed by the Open Society Foundation (green), Italian NGOs financed by OSF (blue), and organizations with shared projects with OSF (purple).


Soros Italian NGO network
Soros Italian NGO network

The network, as exemplified by CILDI, is extensive and intricate. It ranges from former ministers, Kyenge (Immigration) and Bonino (foreign affairs), both directly responsible for the large influx of migrants being forcefully accepted into Italy, to support groups promoting press censorship, but also providing juridical support, advocacy and publications.
Only in few cases one can inspect their budgets, not exactly a trait suggesting transparency and openness.

The main theme of the Open Society network is to use anti-discrimination laws to promote unlimited migration via the abolition of borders. The idea is clearly stated in the manifesto of many organizations. Most organizations promote their extreme views as “fact based’’ or “common sense’’ to give themselves an aura of scientific approach, while providing subjective and ideological interpretation of data and omitting inconvenient information. That is also why they omit the nationality of the criminal. It’s equivalent to admitting there is a problem but it should not be talked about. This is typical of totalitarian regimes, not democratic and certainly not “open’’ societies. The stated goal of “correct information on the theme of immigration’’ is certainly not achieved this way.

Finally, the no-borders strategy is being implemented with the widespread action of the immigration lobby in favour of NGOs operating in the Mediterranean. Whether through its funding or publications covering the topic, conferences, research or information channels for migrants, the network effectively provides support for migrants, regardless of whether they are legal or illegal…

Read More:

Black Lives Matter: The Rise of the “DINDU”

Michael Brown was a man, who robbed a liquor store and at the same time assaulted its clerk. He then went on to attack a police officer and attempted to hijack his weapon and was shot in the ensuing scuffle. And to top it all off, Black Lives Matter (BLM) got its start and first martyr. Also many in his community and then nationwide tried to claim him to be an innocent “gentle giant.”

The term “dindu,” became popular in the aftermath of Michael Brown’s death and the Ferguson, Missouri riots to describe a certain class of criminal. The term is a pejorative for criminals and gang members (and their families) who feign innocence and never take responsibility for their actions (when caught in the commission of a crime by the police). It is used, in the title to explain the rise of criminals and their supporters who believe they are not required to be responsible for their actions and now have movements like BLM who will support them against “the system” no matter what they do.

The media / government and those that fund them: The corporations. The well funded (George Soros) along with academia is pushing to divide peoples everywhere. They use events like this to enrage people. Resist with knowledge.

This whole video was inspired by someone who sent me the article on the former Marine being assaulted by BLM supporters. — Hat tip to Ted. T. For material used, please see here.…

“The End Goal Is To Destroy The Constitution and Subvert The Country” – How Secretive Non-Profit Organizations Erode The United States

 George Soros Quote: I cannot and do not look at the social cosequences of what I do.

One of the biggest problems facing this nation is the amount of money that has been “sequestered,” to term it, for “Non-Profit Organizations,” or “NPO’s.”  Why?  They present a problem when they can be used by an unscrupulous individual or groups of unscrupulous individuals (for examples, a George Soros, or the Democratic Party respectively).  What is an NPO?  Let’s look at what they are and see if the definition is characterized by actual NPO actions.

Here is an excerpt from a book that describes NPO’s (what they should be):

“The main financial difference between a for-profit and a not-for-profit enterprise is what happens to the profit.  In a for-profit company like Ford or Microsoft or Disney or your favorite fast-food establishment, profits are paid to the owners, including shareholders.  But a nonprofit can’t do that.  Any profit remaining after the bills are paid has to be plowed back into the organization’s service program.  So profit can’t be distributed to individuals, such as the organization’s board of directors, who are volunteers in every sense of the word.”

Nonprofit Kit for Dummies,” ISBN: 0-7645-5347-X, pg. 8

Austere and stoic, these NPO’s, all!  Ahh, but what is conveniently left out is the salary portion…for the directors.  Those salaries are written off as an operating expense by the “Non-Profit,” but they’re hardly the funds gleaned by a “simple volunteer for the beneficent NPO.”  Another paragraph from the book shows this:

…for the most part, we’re talking about an organization that the Internal Revenue Service has classified as a 501(c)(3).  They receive exemption from federal income taxes and sometimes relief from property taxes at the local level.  Nonprofit organizations classified as 501(c)(3) receive extra privileges under the law.  They are, with minor exceptions, the only group of tax-exempt organizations that can receive tax-deductible contributions from individuals and organizations.

Being a nonprofit organization does not mean that an entity is exempt from paying all taxes.  Nonprofit organizations pay employment taxes just like for-profit businesses do.  In some states, but not all, nonprofits are exempt from paying sales tax…”

Read More: