9/11 – Brief Summary of Evidence Supporting Controlled Demolition of Twin Towers

Remember that report published by a globalist, neocon organization called The Project for a New American Century that said America needs “a new Pearl Harbor?”

9/11 revisited – A brief summary of the evidence supporting controlled demolition as the cause of the total symmetrical free-fall collapses of the Twin Towers (and Building 7). This video contains a portion of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film “September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor” (below) by film maker Massimo Mazzucco, which investigates in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks.

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 2 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 3 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…

Keeping 9/11 Secret – Former British MI5 Officer on how it’s Possible – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ouof…

9/11 Collapses Violated Fundamental Laws of Physics – Explained – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVHW…

9/11 – What Happened to the Passengers? – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGB9A…

Nano-thermite –

“Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives”  [https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html ] : …”Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together….In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. “These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius,” [6,332 degrees F] says Simpson….The [Lawrence] Livermore team has successfully synthesized metal oxide gels from a myriad elements.”…

MIT Technology Review – https://www.technologyreview.com/s/40… : “Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos…’Superthermites can increase the (chemical) reaction time by a thousand times,’ Son says, resulting in a very rapid reactive wave.” .

Unreacted Nano-thermite “chips” made up of iron oxide, aluminum, silicon, and carbon, were discovered in the dust from the WTC building collapses by independent researchers. When tested these tiny chips exhibited the properties of Nano-thermite and were definitely not chips of “primer paint” that debunkers claimed them to be. Nano-thermite is a very sophisticated military grade incendiary, so how did it get there?

Keeping 9/11 Secret – Former British MI5 Officer on how it’s Possible

9/11 revisited – In attempting to debunk the idea that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, the argument is often espoused that “with so many people who would have been involved, it would be impossible to keep it a secret – somebody would have talked.” That is not necessarily the case, as former British MI5 officer Annie Machon describes in this video: “…there might be one or two people who have the over-all picture, and then other people would have compartmentalized views of what happened…it’s very much a “need to know.”

“…even if it were the case that thousands of people were involved in something illegal on 9/11 that came out of the American administration – the American government – they would probably keep quiet. Where would their interest lie in going public about it? One, it would certainly ruin their livelihood, and it might well jeopardize other things, up to and including their lives. So those are strong incentives to keep quiet if you’re involved in those sorts of things.”

In addition, if a false-flag operation took place during same-day drills for the same kind of attack (9/11 and London’s 7/7 drills), most people involved would be simply performing their normal duties.

Former British MI5 Officer on False Flag Ops and 9/11 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZsxH…

Do you have questions about 9/11? This excellent 5 hour investigative film examines in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks:

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 2 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 3 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…

SGTreport BOMBSHELL: METHODICAL DECEPTION — Rebekah Roth

Former flight attendant turned researcher, truth teller and author Rebekah Roth joins me on the 14th anniversary of 9/11 to discuss her new book ‘Methodical Deception’, the follow up to her very popular first book ‘Methodical Illusion’. Both books are available at www.methodicaldeception.com

In this interview Rebekah drops some bombshells that prove not only that 9/11 was a false flag event long in the planning, but that the operation leads directly back to companies and intelligence assets deeply rooted in and connected to the state of Israel.

In fact, some of the information shared in this remarkable interview is so critical for every American to understand that if you don’t want to listen to the full interview, at least make sure you fast forward to the 31:20 mark. Because as Rebekah says, “This is the elephant in the room that nobody wanted to talk about.” The pictures you will see and the information you will hear may well shock you to your core. Share it with your friends and family.

Every single American citizen should know the truth about what happened on 9/11 and the months leading up to it – and who the REAL culprits were.

THE REACH OF WAR: ARRANGED DEPARTURES; New Details on F.B.I. Aid for Saudis After 9/11

FBI-logo

Why would the FBI allow one special family to leave the country when all air travel was suspended? ..P.D.

By ERIC LICHTBLAU
MARCH 27, 2005

WASHINGTON, March 26 – The episode has been retold so many times in the last three and a half years that it has become the stuff of political legend: in the frenzied days after Sept. 11, 2001, when some flights were still grounded, dozens of well-connected Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, managed to leave the United States on specially chartered flights.

Now, newly released government records show previously undisclosed flights from Las Vegas and elsewhere and point to a more active role by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in aiding some of the Saudis in their departure.

The F.B.I. gave personal airport escorts to two prominent Saudi families who fled the United States, and several other Saudis were allowed to leave the country without first being interviewed, the documents show.

The Saudi families, in Los Angeles and Orlando, requested the F.B.I. escorts because they said they were concerned for their safety in the wake of the attacks, and the F.B.I. — which was then beginning the biggest criminal investigation in its history — arranged to have agents escort them to their local airports, the documents show.

But F.B.I. officials reacted angrily, both internally and publicly, to the suggestion that any Saudis had received preferential treatment in leaving the country.

“I say baloney to any inference we red-carpeted any of this entourage,” an F.B.I. official said in a 2003 internal note. Another F.B.I. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said this week regarding the airport escorts that “we’d do that for anybody if they felt they were threatened — we wouldn’t characterize that as special treatment.”

The documents were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Justice Department by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, which provided copies to The New York Times.

The material sheds new light on the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, and it provides details about the F.B.I.’s interaction with at least 160 Saudis who were living in or visiting the United States and were allowed to leave the country. Some of the departing Saudis were related to Osama bin Laden.

The Saudis’ chartered flights, arranged in the days after the attacks when many flights in the United States were still grounded, have proved frequent fodder for critics of the Bush administration who accuse it of coddling the Saudis. The debate was heightened by the filmmaker Michael Moore, who scrutinized the issue in “Fahrenheit 9/11,” but White House officials have adamantly denied any special treatment for the Saudis, calling such charges irresponsible and politically motivated.

The Sept. 11 commission examined the Saudi flights in its final report last year, and it found that no Saudis had been allowed to leave before national airspace was reopened on Sept. 13, 2001; that there was no evidence of “political intervention” by the White House; and that the F.B.I. had done a “satisfactory screening” of the departing Saudis to ensure they did not have information relevant to the attacks.

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch, with major passages heavily deleted, do not appear to contradict directly any of those central findings, but they raise some new questions about the episode.

F.B.I. records show, for instance, that prominent Saudi citizens left the United States on several flights that had not been previously disclosed in public accounts, including a chartered flight from Providence, R.I., on Sept. 14, 2001, that included at least one member of the Saudi royal family, and three flights from Las Vegas between Sept. 19 and Sept. 24, also carrying members of the Saudi royal family. The government began reopening airspace on Sept. 13, but many flights remained grounded for days afterward

The three Las Vegas flights, with a total of more than 100 passengers, ferried members of the Saudi royal family and staff members who had been staying at Caesar’s Palace and the Four Seasons hotels. The group had tried unsuccessfully to charter flights back to Saudi Arabia between Sept. 13 and Sept. 17 because they said they feared for their safety as a result of the Sept. 11 attacks, the F.B.I. documents say.

Once the group managed to arrange chartered flights out of the country, an unidentified prince in the Las Vegas group “thanked the F.B.I. for their assistance,” according to one internal report. The F.B.I. had interviewed many members of the group and searched their planes before allowing them to leave, but it nonetheless went back to the Las Vegas hotels with subpoenas five days after the initial flight had departed to collect further information on the Saudi royal guests, the documents show.

In several other cases, Saudi travelers were not interviewed before departing the country, and F.B.I. officials sought to determine how what seemed to be lapses had occurred, the documents show.

The F.B.I. documents left open the possibility that some departing Saudis had information relevant to the Sept. 11 investigation.

“Although the F.B.I. took all possible steps to prevent any individuals who were involved in or had knowledge of the 9/11/2001 attacks from leaving the U.S. before they could be interviewed,” a 2003 memo said, “it is not possible to state conclusively that no such individuals left the U.S. without F.B.I. knowledge.”

The documents also show that F.B.I. officials were clearly riled by public speculation stirred by news media accounts of the Saudi flights. They were particularly bothered by a lengthy article in the October 2003 issue of Vanity Fair, which included charges that the bureau considered unfair and led to an internal F.B.I. investigation that the agency named “Vanitybom.” Internal F.B.I. correspondence during the review was addressed to “fellow Vanitybom victims.”

Critics said the newly released documents left them with more questions than answers.

“From these documents, these look like they were courtesy chats, without the time that would have been needed for thorough debriefings,” said Christopher J. Farrell, who is director of investigations for Judicial Watch and a former counterintelligence interrogator for the Army. “It seems as if the F.B.I. was more interested in achieving diplomatic success than investigative success.”

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, called for further investigation.

“This lends credence to the theory that the administration was not coming fully clean about their involvement with the Saudis,” he said, “and we still haven’t gotten to the bottom of this whole affair.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/27/washington/world/the-reach-of-war-arranged-departures-new-details-on-fbi

A Billion Dollars of Federally Funded Paranoia | Mises Wire

Fusion centers do a far better job of stoking paranoia than of catching terrorists.

DHS

When it comes to mindless excess in the war on terror, it is difficult to compete with the 70+ fusion centers bankrolled by the Department of Homeland Security. They began to be set up around the nation shortly after 9/11 as federal-state-local partnerships to better track terrorist threats. But the centers have been a world-class boondoggle from the start.

Fusion centers have sent the federally funded roundup of data on Americans’ private lives into overdrive. As the Brennan Center for Justice noted in 2012, “Until 9/11, police departments had limited authority to gather information on innocent activity, such as what people say in their houses of worship or at political meetings. Police could only examine this type of First Amendment-protected activity if there was a direct link to a suspected crime. But the attacks of 9/11 led law enforcement to turn this rule on its head.”

Fusion centers do a far better job of stoking paranoia than of catching terrorists. Various fusion centers have attached the “extremist” tag to gun-rights activists, anti-immigration zealots, and individuals and groups “rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority” — even though many of the Founding Fathers shared the same creed. A 2012 DHS report went even further, stating that being “reverent of individual liberty” is one of the traits of potential right-wing terrorists. Such absurd standards help explain why the federal terrorist watchlist now contains more than a million names.

Federal management is so slipshod that a 2012 Senate investigation found that the federal estimates of spending on fusion centers varied by more than 400 percent — ranging from $289 million to $1.4 billion. A DHS internal report found that 4 of 72 fusion centers did not actually exist, but that did not deter DHS officials from continuing to exaggerate the number of such centers. The Washington Post highlighted a few of the dubious findings: “More than $2 million was spent on a center for Philadelphia that never opened. In Ohio, officials used the money to buy rugged laptop computers and then gave them to a local morgue. San Diego officials bought 55 flat-screen televisions to help them collect ‘open-source intelligence’ — better known as cable television news.”

A Senate investigation found that DHS intelligence officers at fusion centers produced intelligence of “uneven quality — oftentimes shoddy, rarely timely, sometimes endangering citizens’ civil liberties and Privacy Act protections, occasionally taken from already-published public sources, and more often than not unrelated to terrorism.” A Senate investigation found no evidence that the fusion centers had provided any assistance in detecting or disrupting any terrorist plots. Sen. Tom Coburn, who spearheaded the Senate investigation, observed, “Unfortunately, DHS has resisted oversight of these centers. The Department opted not to inform Congress or the public of serious problems plaguing its fusion center and broader intelligence efforts. When this Subcommittee requested documents that would help it identify these issues, the Department initially resisted turning them over, arguing that they were protected by privilege, too sensitive to share, were protected by confidentiality agreements, or did not exist at all.”