What changed with the Liberals and Immigration? Why did they go from Liberal to Leftist? 

It’s funny that all of these Democrats agree with most American’s views on illegal immigration… just in the past.

What changed with them? Why did they go from liberal to leftist?

Harry Reid 1993: ‘No Sane Country’ Would Do Birthright Citizenship; 9-20-1993:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJY4yHeYSjw

Clinton: Send some immigrant kids home:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FP6t0OUlk&feature=youtu.be

President Obama Gives a Policy Speech on Immigration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVuuzTJBE5Y

Schumer on illegal aliens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdL2k8jbnAs

Dianne Feinstein opposing ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aqOfDbZmj8

Bill Clinton Receives Standing O In 1995 State Of The Union For Tough Stance On Illegal Immigration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy8UwpenlEA

I think it’s simply media manipulation. No one realized that their go-to media sources have changed?
Just today, listening to NPR on the immigrant thing…they present a human interest story about family and voting, but inside the story is a bunch of stuff about immigration, but they never actually present any facts or even differentiate between legal and illegal immigration and the benefits and costs of each. It’s just low-information, emotional content, meant to sway voters w/out any facts.  https://www.npr.org/2018/11/01/662855443/a-couples-plan-to-vote-on-issues-related-to-family

Illegal immigrants are presented as a good thing because “they do the jobs other’s don’t want to.” But they don’t mention that’s really an argument for corporate profits. The corporations want low wage workers so they can have more profits.

Because corporations claim they can’t afford to pay Americans living wages, we accept illegal workers, forced to live in horrible conditions, many to a room, in shifts, with few protections or rights, as second class humans, living illegally, in the shadows

The same illegal labor market actually undercuts poor Americans’ wages and opportunities and additionally the money that is earned by illegal immigrants leaves the community when it’s sent overseas as remittances.

That money, spent by the legal residents, would have been recycled into the local economy and enriched a poor community. Why doesn’t NPR or the Democrats care about poor Americans? Why do they want illegals immigrants? Why do they equate legal and illegal immigrants?

NPR and others claim it’s their human rights to live wherever they want, but they leave out the rights of the residents who live in the country they’re immigrating to.

Do the people who live legally in a country have a right to keep their homeland?

Do they have a right to their own culture?

Illegal immigrants cost billions a year in Federal, State and Local expenses. But with the loss of wages to poor Americans and the loss of money in local economies makes the cost much  higher.

The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers
https://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers

The Cost of Illegal Immigration
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11829/illegal-immigration-cost

Then there’s the open borders thing. It’s very dangerous to encourage illegal crossings. 80% of females making the illegal crossing at the southern border are raped during the journey and many of the women and children are being trafficked.

80% Of Central American Women, Girls Are Raped Crossing Into The U.S.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/12/central-america-migrants-rape_n_5806972.html

Operational Contract Support Joint Exercise combats human trafficking
https://www.army.mil/article/165364/operational_contract_support_joint_exercise_combats_human_trafficking

GLOBAL STUDY ON SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS 2018
https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glosom/GLOSOM_2018_ExecutiveSummary_web_small.pdf

The drug cartels also use the border for human smuggling including guns, drugs, and child sex trafficking and banks like HSBC have been caught profitting from their activity.

How a big US bank laundered billions from Mexico’s murderous drug gangshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs

HSBC has form: remember Mexico and laundered drug money
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/15/hsbc-has-form-mexico-laundered-drug-money

Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War Is a Joke

Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War Is a Joke

4 Things The Media Won’t Tell You About The Border Crisis
http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/20/4-things-media-wont-tell-border-crisis/

Do Whites Have a Right to a Homeland? Do Whites have a Right to a Culture? Why is mass migration “a source of our strength?”

What is the real agenda here, other than divide and conquer?

Mass migration is actually the same thing Stalin did to break up any ethnic cohesion that might have organized against his rule.

‘Go away, you shouldn’t be here. Don’t come back’: The corner of Yorkshire that has almost no white residents

    • There are almost no white residents to be found in Savile Town, Yorkshire 
  • Last census found only 48 of 4,033 people living there were white British
  • Even lady selling ice cream from a van during the summer wears a burka

From the window of her flat overlooking the canal path in a suburb of Dewsbury in Yorkshire, a blonde woman watches two female figures walking past as they chatter in a foreign tongue.

Both the passers-by are covered in black Islamic gowns, only a glimpse of their eyes show from the 2 in gap in the veils across their faces.

They, like many Muslim women who live here, speak little or no English. Lots of them will have no contact with any person from another religion or culture. Many, I imagine, have been brought to the UK to wed the British men of south Asian heritage who have made this area their home.

Read More: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3899540/Go-away-shouldn-t-Don-t-come-corner-Yorkshire-no-white-residents.html

Last Whites of the East End: BBC documentary explores being a white British minority in a hub for migration

In Newham, once a Cockney stronghold, white British residents are a minority for the first time in history. A new BBC documentary asks us to hear what they have to say

Rachael Pells  

“It’s one of the issues we wanted to tackle with the documentary – how to open up a discussion about things like a changing demographic. It has been said that unless we find a language to talk about this kind of stuff, it will get hijacked by the Far Right – and then nobody else has a voice.

“It’s important for people to talk about change and not be judged,” she continues. “These people’s emotions and feelings about it are complex, which is understandable because change is hard.”

Read More: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/last-whites-of-the-east-end-bbc-documentary-cockney-newham-white-british-minority-a7033556.html

‘The most racist programme I’ve ever watched’: BBC faces Twitter backlash over controversial documentary The Last Whites of the East End – while some viewers say ‘it’s only telling the truth’

By EMMA GLANFIELD and JAMES TAPSFIELD  25 May 2016

BBC documentary showing the evolving communities of the East End has drawn criticism from viewers who branded the programme ‘racist’ and accused it of ‘white supremacist propaganda’.

The Last Whites of the East End received mixed reviews on Twitter last night, with some branding it the ‘most racist programme I’ve ever watched’ and others threatening to cancel their licence fee.

However, while not all were impressed with the show, some did applaud the BBC for giving an ‘honest’ insight into the east London borough of Newham where 73 per cent of the local population is now made up of ethnic minorities and Black British.

The programme looked into how cockneys are becoming an endangered species in the borough, with many moving towards Essex, after 70,000 immigrants moved in over the past 15 years.

Read More: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3608136/The-racist-programme-honest-reflection-state-nation-Britain-divided-reaction-Whites-East-End.html

Project Veritas Films Democratic Staffers Using Campaign Funds to Aid and Transport Migrant Caravan

Beto ORoark Staffer Hope Nobody Finds Out About This

“Nobody needs to know” Beto Campaign Appears to Illegally Spend Funds on Supplies for Caravan Aliens, Campaign Manager Says “Don’t Worry”

by Staff Report November 1, 2018

  • “I just hope nobody that’s the wrong person finds out about this.”
  • “It’s f***ing happening.” O’Rourke Campaign Staff Uses Pre-Paid Cards for Honduran Alien Supplies
  • “Don’t ever repeat this…” Campaign Staffers Explain How to Hide Campaign Expenditures for Aliens
  • “If you get caught in some sort of violation that’s like a $50,000 fine,” “For me I can just ignore the rules and I’m like f**k it.”
  • Transporting Aliens to “airports… bus stations,” “None of this is like sh*t there is a rulebook for”
  • Staffer Says She Sent Confirming Texts to Director

(Austin) Project Veritas Action Fund has released undercover video from current Congressman and US Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke’s campaign. The video exposes how his campaign staff appear to be illegally using campaign resources to buy supplies and help transport Honduran aliens. This is the eighth undercover video report Project Veritas has released in a series revealing secrets and lies from political campaigns in 2018.

Said James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action:

“Charity and helping your fellow man are things we applaud at Project Veritas Action.  The problem is, you can’t break the law when you do it.” 

“Don’t ever repeat this”

Featured in this report are campaign staffers who work on Congressman O’Rourke’s US Senate campaign discussing how they use campaign resources to help Honduran aliens and transport them to airports and bus stations. Said Dominic Chacon and AnaPaula Themann, who work on O’Rourke’s campaign:

Chacon: “The Hondurans, yeah… I’m going to go get some food right now, like just some stuff to drop off…”

Themann: “How did they get through?”

Chacon: “Well I think they accepted them as like asylum-seekers… So, I’m going to get some groceries and some blankets…”

Themann: “Don’t ever repeat this and stuff but like if we just say that we’re buying food for a campaign event, like the Halloween events…”

Chacon: “That’s not a horrible idea, but I didn’t hear anything. Umm, we can wait until tomorrow for that.”

Themann: “Well that’s exactly the food we need. And I will just mark it as, I do have dozens of block walkers.”

Read More: https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2018/11/01/beto/

When did Democrats Lose Their Minds On Illegal Immigration?

state by state cost of illegal immigration

How much do Illegally-entering, undocumented, residents and workers cost the legal residents and citizens of the US on an annual basis? $100 billion? $130 billion? 

low-skilled, illegal/undocumented residents have the net effect of pushing down unskilled wages and sending the bulk of their earnings overseas as remittances effectively transferring massive amounts of money from the lower class residents of a country.

These are the consistent results of studies on this topic. Evidentially, illegal immigration is a negative for resident populations so articles in support of open borders have to equate legal immigrants and illegal immigrants as the same thing. 

Of course this is globalist corporatism because the only beneficiaries are the corporations that get to pay lower and lower wages for higher and higher profits. 

The next thing corporate media will be pushing is nationalizing property for equal distribution to all residents of the world via a centralized government power… Global Communism.

Flashback 2005: Sen.Obama On Illegal Immigration

The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers

Matt O’Brien and Spencer Raley | September 27, 2017

…At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens, and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens. That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and a total of $115,894,597,664. The total cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling. In 2013, FAIR estimated the total cost to be approximately $113 billion. So, in under four years, the cost has risen nearly $3 billion. This is a disturbing and unsustainable trend. The sections below will break down and further explain these numbers at the federal, state, and local levels….

Read More: https://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers

The Fiscal Cost of Resettling Refugees in the United States

Matthew O’Brien and Spencer Raley | February 5, 2018

…Using the most recent admissions figures, data on federal and state public assistance programs, and information from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), our analysis found:

  • The cost per refugee to American taxpayers just under $79,600 every year in the first five years after a refugee is resettled in the U.S.;
  • In 2016, the State Department spent nearly $545 million to process and resettle refugees, including $140,389,177 on transportation costs;
  • Of the $1.8 billion in resettlement costs, $867 billion was spent on welfare alone;
  • In their first five years, approximately 54 percent of all refugees will hold jobs that pay less than $11 an hour;
  • $71 million will be spent to educate refugees and asylum-seekers, a majority of which will be paid by state and local governments.
  • Over five years, an estimated 15.7 percent of all refugees will need housing assistance, which is roughly $7,600 per household in 2014 dollars.

It is important to note that this analysis does not address the costs associated with any incurred national security and law enforcement costs associated with some refugees who pose a threat. The total price of additional vetting and screening expenditures, law enforcement and criminal justice costs, and federal homeland security assistance to state and local agencies is hard to quantify….

Read More: https://www.fairus.org/issue/legal-immigration/fiscal-cost-resettling-refugees-united-states

Economic costs of legal and illegal immigration

Why borders can not be open

“Business interests however are short-term. Easy immediate access to labor will always be preferred to the costs of training and capital investment for the longer term. In the nature of economic cycles, yesterday’s essential labor can often become, as the defunct factories and mills of Europe have shown, today’s unemployed. Employers who demanded immigrant labor are not held to account for this or required to contribute to subsequent costs of their unemployed former workers. Few things are more permanent that temporary worker from a poor country. If business were made responsible for the lifetime costs of their migrant labor in the same way as they must now deal with the lifetime environmental costs of their products, perhaps enthusiasm for labor migration might be moderated and make way for longer-term investment in capital-intensive restructuring.”7

A critique of economics

As noted in the sections below, the economic costs of illegal immigration are staggering. Yet economists – and the mainstream media – tend to downplay and often completely ignore this impact. Western economics is based upon the premise that “growth is good” and that economic stagnation and particularly negative growth are extremely undesirable. With mass immigration driving US population to double within the lifetimes of children born today, one must question whether the economic paradigm of unending physical growth is truly in the best interests of America – and of Americans, no matter what their race, creed, or color.

Read More: https://www.cairco.org/issues/economic-costs-immigration

Guilt-Tripping White People Based on Historic Lies

Maybe the Japanese should give their island back to the Ezo people… Or the Russians should give Russia back to the Yakuts…. Or South Africa should give their land back to the Khwe, etc, etc, etc… but no, only white Americans deserve to be guilted and shamed for what we now consider historic wrongs…

Emperor Palpatine says, Good Good Let the White Guilt Flow Through You

WHY WHITES DIDN’T STEAL AMERICA FROM ANYBODY

Well it is that time of year again. The time when “progressives” nation wide start sharing memes about Europeans being “Illegal Aliens” and Native Americans were kind enough to let us into “their” country…

We see this all the time from the ignorant fools, but more so around Thanksgiving. They fail to realize that, if anything, their arguments promote stricter immigration polices, not laxer.

What we see here is a prime example of what is called “presentism” . Presentism is when historical accounts are judged by the standards of the present. Most scholars will agree that it is a rather ignorant way to look at the past.

It would be improper to claim that George Washington was an evil man because he owned slaves simply because during his life, the majority opinion was that owning slaves was not evil. As a better example, let’s say that in 100 years, we discover that plants have advanced consciousness. It would be ignorant for people of that time to say that everyone alive today is evil for eating plants, because in todays standards, eating plants is not only acceptable, but encouraged.

So let’s instead look at what was acceptable, and encouraged during the time of colonial America. Throughout much of history (including the 1600’s) it was normal for a conquering army to claim the lands of their defeated foe. This is a practice that goes back into antiquity with the Persian, Greeks Romans, Egyptian, Israelis, Chinese and many other cultures taking part.

Taking land by conquest was also a part of Native American culture. Creek Indians conquered land from Choctaws and Chickasaws and the Creeks. Comanches came in and took the land from the Apaches by war, Aztecs, Incas and Mayans all grew their empires by conquering lands from other tribes. The Tainos and Canib tribes fought over land. When Spain Defeated the Aztec empire, the did so with an army of 1,000 Spanish soldiers and 75,000 soldiers from the Tlaxcallans, Choulatecs and Totonac tribes..

The practice of claiming the land of conquered enemies extended well past the colonization of America. It wasn’t until the conclusion of World War II in 1945 that western culture shunned the practice (and even then, the Soviet Union claimed Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Austria, and many other territories as part of their victory spoils).

To claim “white Europeans” “stole” America from the native tribes is to force the cultural norms of the past 50 years (that white Europeans created) on events that happened hundreds of years earlier. That is just ignorant.

Read More: http://www.thetruthhunter.com/why-whites-didnt-steal-america-from-anybody/

There Are Differences Between Legal and Illegal Immigration: Billions

 

national expenditure on undocumented residents
National Expenditure on Undocumented Residents
Taxes Paid by Undocumented Residents
Taxes Paid by Undocumented Residents
Total Economic Impact of Illegal Immigration
Total Economic Impact of Illegal Immigration

The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers

Matt O’Brien and Spencer Raley | September 27, 2017

Introduction

A continually growing population of illegal aliens, along with the federal government’s ineffective efforts to secure our borders, present significant national security and public safety threats to the United States. They also have a severely negative impact on the nation’s taxpayers at the local, state, and national levels. Illegal immigration costs Americans billions of dollars each year. Illegal aliens are net consumers of taxpayer-funded services and the limited taxes paid by some segments of the illegal alien population are, in no way, significant enough to offset the growing financial burdens imposed on U.S. taxpayers by massive numbers of uninvited guests. This study examines the fiscal impact of illegal aliens as reflected in both federal and state budgets.

Read More: https://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers

Open Borders Libertarians are Globalist Pawns

His idea that a border is the initiation of violence is assuming it’s initiating violence to have defensive protection of your people, resources and interests.

If only we had a Utopian world where everyone sought to share and contribute equally…. but with the welfare state and economic realities like labor availability versus wages, it’s just as easy to see illegal residents as having initiated violence against me, by breaking our laws to unlawfully break our borders and take our resources.

The argument is ridiculous. Do you call locking your door at night an initiation of violence against the people that would illegally enter and take your possessions or rape your wife or daughter?

As a libertarian you still contribute to a greater organization of people that we call our society, and involves government even if you want to call it another name, there is some organization for common defense required in any organization of people. It’s not violence to defend what you have built and the resources you’ve collected.

The people entering our country illegally are not here to share their resources, they’re here to take our resources. That, in itself violates the NAP.

 

Real Talk: Legal Immigration and ILLEGAL Immigration are not the SAME Things

every 30 seconds another person becomes a victim of human trafficking

People like myself that believe (for reasons not racist) that one of the only good purposes of a federal government is to secure the border. 

“Our founders, asserted their concerns publicly and routinely about the effects of indiscriminate mass immigration. They made it clear that the purpose of allowing foreigners into our fledgling nation was not to recruit millions of new voters or to secure permanent ruling majorities for their political parties. It was to preserve, protect, and enhance the republic they put their lives on the line to establish.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/…/immigration-founding…/

Though, I don’t agree with separating families, the media coverage is almost entirely exaggerated and hyperbolic to create an emotional reaction against Trump, while excluding a bunch of important and rational details…

“…the reporting from the border has also been incomplete, misleading, and at times biased and emotionally overwrought. It’s no secret the mainstream media disagrees with Trump’s push to crack down on illegal immigration and tighten border security, but that shouldn’t excuse the lack of nuance and granularity in much of the reporting we’ve seen over the past week or so.”
http://thefederalist.com/…/4-things-media-wont-tell…/

I think his base is concerned about illegal immigration, the argument is hardly ever against LEGAL immigration but the media acts like they’re all purely racist against all immigrants.

“It’s not personal. Republicans aren’t anti-immigrant. They’re anti-illegal immigration. It’s the basis of any society to prioritize its resources for its own members rather than diverting them to people in other societies. Our society is our responsibility, their societies are their responsibility.”
http://thefederalist.com/…/no-americans-want-border…/

Not everyone’s racist, there are still a large number that voted for Obama, and also voted for Trump.

“ANES data suggest that about 8.4 million 2012 Obama voters backed Trump in 2016 ”
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/…/just-how-many-obama…/

I think most people and sources agree that legal immigration is a win win…

“Immigration’s Long-Term Impacts on Overall Wages and Employment of Native-Born U.S. Workers Very Small, Although Low-Skilled Workers May Be Affected, New Report Finds; Impacts on Economic Growth Positive, While Effects on Government Budgets Mixed”
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx… 

and the media for “some reason” doesn’t want to admit that ILLEGAL immigration is a negative on our society…

“Illegal immigration costs Americans billions of dollars each year. Illegal aliens are net consumers of taxpayer-funded services and the limited taxes paid by some segments of the illegal alien population are, in no way, significant enough to offset the growing financial burdens imposed on U.S. taxpayers by massive numbers of uninvited guests.”
https://www.fairus.org/…/fiscal-burden-illegal…

A Quality Rundown of the “Family Separation” Immigration Policy

4 Things The Media Won’t Tell You About The Border Crisis

By    20, 2018

The images and stories now being reported from the southern border—families torn apart, children crying for their parents, parents with no idea where their children are—are disturbing and heartbreaking

The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration enforcement policy has obviously created chaos along the border, tasking already overburdened federal agencies with the seemingly impossible job of taking into custody everyone—men, women, and children—caught crossing the border illegally. The number of children taken from their parents and placed in federal custody climbed to about 2,000 from April 19 through May 31, according to figures from the Department of Homeland Security. With border facilities overwhelmed, some teenagers are now being housed in temporary shelters outside El Paso.

But the reporting from the border has also been incomplete, misleading, and at times biased and emotionally overwrought. It’s no secret the mainstream media disagrees with Trump’s push to crack down on illegal immigration and tighten border security, but that shouldn’t excuse the lack of nuance and granularity in much of the reporting we’ve seen over the past week or so.

Illegal immigration and its attendant problems along the U.S.-Mexico border are vastly complex and defy easy solutions. With that in mind, here are four key aspects of the border crisis that the media has failed to report or adequately explain.

1. Prior To ‘Zero Tolerance,’ Families Who Crossed The Border Illegally Were Often Released

For a long time, the vast majority of illegal border crossers were single men from Mexico looking for work. Dealing with them was a fairly straightforward matter: most would be immediately deported to Mexico. It’s not that there weren’t families and unaccompanied minors also illegally entering, but they made up a small subset of illegal immigration.

Beginning in 2014, the situation changed. Large numbers of families and unaccompanied minors began showing up on the border in unprecedented numbers, many seeking asylum from dangerous criminal gangs in their home countries. Most of these foreign citizens were from Central America, not Mexico, and under a 2008 federal law designed to protect victims of human trafficking, migrants from noncontiguous countries have a right to a deportation hearing.

That meant the Obama administration had to figure out what to do with tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors and families that could not be quickly deported. Some were placed in shelters run by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) along the border, but because shelter space was limited, many more were placed with family members while they awaited hearings. Thousands have waited more than three years for a hearing, and thousands more have been ordered to be removed from the country in absentia (they never showed up for their hearing).

During this time, Obama was attacked from the Left for operating family detention centers in Texas and Pennsylvania. A New York Times editorial from July 2016 criticized the administration’s detention policies, saying the “privately run, unlicensed lockups are no place for children. Or mothers.”

A year earlier, a federal judge had ordered the administration to close two centers in Texas, citing the 1997 court settlement Flores v. Reno, which requires the government to hold children in the “least-restrictive setting” in places that are “licensed to care for children,” and to release them without delay to their parents or other adult relatives whenever possible. The Obama administration unsuccessfully appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which upheld the district court’s ruling that Flores applied to all children, accompanied or not. But the court also said the administration could detain parents who crossed illegally.

The Obama administration responded to these rulings with a combination of deportation raids targeting criminals and a “catch-and-release” policy for families apprehended at the border, who would usually be issued notices to appear at an immigration hearing at some later date. This “catch-and-release” policy is what the Trump administration is trying to end.

To that end, Trump has invoked Flores as the reason for separating parents and children, saying the settlement limits what federal agencies can do with children brought here illegally and apprehended at the border. He blames congressional Democrats for failing to negotiate on an immigration bill that would solve the problem—although saddling Democrats with all the blame is disingenuous. Republicans have also failed to act on immigration (although now they say they’re ready to pass a bill to keep families together).

The media have been nearly unanimous in contradicting Trump, arguing that Flores does not force the federal government to separate parents and children, and that the administration has discretion in how it treats these families.

Both sides have a point. Flores does indeed limit how long, and under what circumstances, federal immigration authorities can detain children. But it only “forces” the separation of families if the parents are detained and prosecuted for illegal entry. In that case, families are separated because children can’t stay with their parents if the parents are in criminal custody.

Before Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy, families caught crossing illegally were often released within a few days and the parents fitted with an electronic ankle monitor to reduce the likelihood of them absconding. Back in March, when I was reporting on the border in McAllen, Texas, I met a number of people from Central America who were wearing an ankle monitor. Most planned to cut it off and throw it away when they got to where they were going.

2. Illegal Immigrants Who Are Released Often Fail To Appear At Court Hearings

Indeed, failure to appear at court hearings is a major problem in our immigration system—one the media is glossing over in its coverage of the border crisis.

According to the DOJ’s Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), the office that handles all immigration cases, a significant number of illegal immigrants who are released from custody never show up for their court hearings. Statistics from 2016 (PDF) show that “non-detained aliens,” which include those who were never detained and those who were released on bond or their own recognizance, failed to show up for court hearings in 39 percent of completed immigration cases—a 110 percent increase compared to 2012.

Read More: http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/20/4-things-media-wont-tell-border-crisis/

Conflict of Interest: Criminal Global Banking Conglomerates Own the Media

Trust Me

Yesterday I pointed out that…

even when global banking conglomerates are caught red-handed, profiting from human misery (including human trafficking and sex trade) they only get fined. No one goes to jail, because the politicians are on the take…
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

Well, today I would like to further point out how the media is partially owned by the big banks, so they won’t go very far to raise outrage when they get caught supporting human traffickers…

It’s just one example but it turns out that HSBC holds massive amounts of Time Warner stock. Time Warner owns Turner, Turner owns CNN. CNN pays Anderson Cooper to read whatever they tell him to.

“Hsbc Holdings PLC increased its position in shares of Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) by 24.6% in the 1st quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 1,984,015 shares of the media conglomerate’s stock after buying an additional 391,221 shares during the period. Hsbc Holdings PLC’s holdings in Time Warner were worth $187,648,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.”

Read More: https://www.tickerreport.com/…/time-warner-twx-position…

Well, just one example of how an international bank that was caught profiting from Cartel money (which includes profits from human trafficking) is also a major investor in an American Media conglomerate.

Do you really think that international corporations work for the good of the people?

You really think that what they call “news” and “information” are legitimate and not pro-corporate, pro-crime propaganda? 

It’s propaganda-for-profit.