I happened to be reading at Huffington Post on March 6th their truthful top-of-homepage news-report:
And I saw there also a March 3rd headline regarding a news-event that I happened to have researched in depth (as will be summarized below), this headline being:
That was from HuffPo’s reporter, Akbar Shahid Ahmed, who writes:
Speaking from Geneva after the latest round of internationally sponsored talks between the opposition and the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, Maj. Issam Al Reis, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army, cited its push against ISIS in northern Syria, in collaboration with Turkish forces, and the rebels’ resistance against ISIS advances in the south as evidence that it’s ready for the U.S. to step up. …
«The regime is not fighting ISIS», Al Reis, a former officer in Assad’s army, said. He noted that Assad’s forces, which rely heavily on Russian jets and pro-Iran fighters, had captured and then lost Palmyra to ISIS before.
Analysts say Assad’s coalition has focused most of its attacks on the Free Syrian Army, which is relatively moderate and which the West considers an acceptable alternative to the regime, rather than on ISIS and the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda, which the U.S. and a host of other nations are committed to defeating.
Here are the facts, which I had reported and documented at the end of 2016, headlining «How Obama Overrode Kerry’s Agreements with Russia». I documented there that on September 17th, Obama’s forces had bombed the Syrian Army at Deir ez Zor, which brought to an end the U.S. participation in the peace-negotiations on Syria, “the sabotaging-event, which naturally caused Putin to instruct [Russia’s Foreign Minister] Lavrov to terminate all discussions with [Secretary of State] Kerry, because it displayed Obama’s unwavering determination to defeat Russia».
After Donald Trump went public with accusations of politically-motivated wiretapping by the previous administration, The New York Times tries to erase evidence of their own reporting using those same classified wiretaps.
The January 20th print version of the article headline says, “Wiretapped Data Used In Inquiry Of Trump Aides.”
After Trump’s tweet dump on March 5th, the online version of the same article’s headline now contains no mention of wiretapping.
In the latest fake news CNN controversy we see the network, once again, terminate an interview after the “F word” was mentioned.
Lemon interrupted to shut down Dennard’s use of the term “fake news,” minutes before the show ended.
“Fake news is when you put out a story to intentionally deceive someone and you know that it is wrong,” he said.
“This story that we’re doing right now is not to intentionally deceive anyone. We are simply talking about the cost to keep a president safe,” he continued.
“Please stop it with that stupid talking point, that it is a fake news story. If you don’t want to participate in the news stories on this network, then don’t come on and participate. But don’t call them fake because you don’t agree with them. Go on.”
Dennard insisted that “this is a fake news story,” after which Lemon ended the segment altogether. (The Hill)
No wonder they killed this guy.
This Week in Stupid (26/02/2017) – The Rationalists
“Ever onward to oblivion!”
Flemming Rose is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. Jacob Mchangama is director of the Copenhagen-based think tank Justitia.
Remember George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth? In his dystopian novel “1984,” its purpose was to dictate and protect the government’s version of reality. During the Cold War, Orwell’s book was banned behind the Iron Curtain, because readers perceived the novel as an allegory for their own repressive regimes.
It was a serious crime to distribute information defaming the Soviet social and political system. Such criminal laws were widely used by the Kremlin to silence dissidents, human rights activists, religious movements and groups fighting for independence in the Soviet republics. Similar laws were on the books in East Germany, Poland and other Eastern bloc countries.
Thankfully, today this landscape is much changed, but increasingly there are disturbing echoes of the past. Amid a debate about the rising influence of fake news and the danger it poses to the political and social order in the West, democratic politicians in Europe have proposed sanctions — and even prison terms — for those found responsible for distributing false information.
Surprise, Politifact says Donald Trump made a FALSE statement when he tweeted that Bernie was cut off for using the term “fake news” on CNN.
Politifact tells us, he was cut off because of technical difficulties!
Thank you Poltifact, “winner of the Pulitzer Prize,” what would we do without you?
Translated: “The idea that a popular uprising took place against President Assad is completely false. I’ve been in Qara since 2010 and I have seen with my own eyes how agitators from outside Syria organized protests against the government and recruited young people. That was filmed and aired by Al Jazeera to give the impression that a rebellion was taking place. Murders were committed by foreign terrorists, against the Sunni and Christian communities, in an effort to sow religious and ethnic discord among the Syrian people. While in my experience, the Syrian people were actually very united.”
In the latest from the front lines of the establishment’s war against free speech and culture, a mainstream YouTuber gets woke after accidentally going against their social programming agenda.
The cultural Marxism of the dying establishment and their dinosaur pravda will go to any length to label dissenters as racists and Nazis, even if everyone can see with their own eyes that it is ridiculous satire.
Every time the dinosaur media cooks up some false impression that is instantly recognizable to internet denizens, as false, they dig their own fake news grave deeper.
In return they get trolled by an irreverent troll culture that does not care about their fake morals, and the trolls up the ante every time.
Is the media and establishment so brain dead that they create and build up their own worst enemies? (which is exactly what happened with Donald Trump) Or is this an orchestrated attempt by a few controlling interests to build up and supply both sides of a war?
Just like WW1 and every conflict since, are we seeing the masters of Wall Street simply play their old games of manipulating and funding both sides of a conflict?