WuWu Wednesdays – The Secrets Behind Anti-Gravity Propulsion Systems

Join me for the “Disclosing the Secret Space Program” Webcast on January 27th. Sign up here – https://www.secretspaceprogram.com/

T. Townsend Brown: Suppressed Inventions & Other Discoveries – https://goo.gl/wWFqVZ

TR-3B Antigravity Physics Explained – https://goo.gl/rqHk1B

Otis Carr: How the U.S. Government Suppressed the World’s First Civilian Spacecraft Industry – https://goo.gl/ypEZFP

Dewey B Larson & The Reciprocal Systems Theory – https://goo.gl/ffUqoe

Clif High – Soaring US Economy and More 2018 Predictions

Internet data mining expert Clif High has a brand new report called “Soaring Twenties.” Clif High says there is good news coming, but not just for 2018, many years after. Clif High explains, “There is a really interesting set of data that’s been building for some time, and we have had this big flush of long term data, which is why I decided to do this report that is going out five years. I named it the “Soaring Twenties,” even though we are not into the 2020’s. . . . Our 2020’s, to some extent, are replicating the kind of language in the newspapers and limited news reels they had at the time of the 1920’s. Only instead of being “The Roaring Twenties,” we’re going to have a “Soaring Twenties.” Clif High also talks about a coming “bond debacle,” soaring gold and silver prices in 2018 . . . the future of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, “legal actions will be taken” against the bad actors in government and the “Deep State.” Clif High also predicts some “fantastic levels of business failures.” Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Clif High of HalfPastHuman.com.

Team Rogue Money – 2018: Where We’re Going, There Are No Roads

The year ahead from the financial/geo-political insiders at Rogue Money.

The Rogue Money team comes together to deliver a near 2 hour jammed pack breakdown of 2017 game changers and predictions of the road ahead for 2018. A must listen to show. We are political scientists, editorial engineers, and radio show developers drawn together by a shared vision of bringing Alternative news through digital mediums that evangelize our civil liberties.

Woo Woo Wednesdays: The Last Card Is the Aliens

By 
December 27, 2017

“And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie.”

— Wernher von Braun to Carol Rosin, 1974

 

We couldn’t let 2017 slip away without commenting on the so-called “UFO disclosure” that oozed from the pages of the N.Y. Times on December 16th. Those of us who have followed the UFO conversation for more than 20 years all collectively rolled our eyes. However, for the benefit of those who are new to the party, let us all remember the oft-repeated prophetic warning that was given to Carol Rosin by her boss, Wernher von Braun, back in the mid-1970’s, as copied above.

Many people who are familiar with that “Last Card” quotation have forgotten the whole speech, or rather, the “Other Cards” that preceded it, as shown in this infographic:

Wernher von Braun was a WWII Nazi insider who likely occupied a rank somewhere between “mid-level” and “top-level.” That is, he would have been privy to German classified advanced weapons research, but not high enough up the food chain to warrant a one-way ticket to Spandau Prison where he would be guarded as the sole inhabitant of that prison even when old age would degenerate him into crippled old man. (I speak, of course, of Rudolf Hess and the unexplained threat he posed that justified millions of dollars being spent to maintain his incarceration for decades. But I digress.)

Drs. Carol Rosin and Wernher von Braun in the 1970's. (Image: ProjectAvalon.net)
DRS. CAROL ROSIN AND WERNHER VON BRAUN IN THE 1970’S.

Von Braun was warning that a Fake News wave would overtake us. First, came the Commie Russian threat which was the propaganda du jour during the Cold War Era (and oh how funny that the “Russian” meme made a huge comeback this past year.) Next would come the Terrorist Threat and the Third World migrant invasion. Yup, we’ve seen that, alrighty. Next would come the Asteroid Threat. Check, though not as earth-shattering as the Terrorist Threat. Maybe TPTB opted for “Climate Change” over “Asteroids.” Whatever; it worked out the same. Finally, the last card on the list was dished up to us this month by that Deep State rag, the N.Y. Times, with the publication of a video that shows two Navy F/A-18F fighter jets from the aircraft carrier Nimitz chasing a UFO off the coast of San Diego in 2004.

The Pentagon has acknowledged a secret program to investigate UFOs. It began in 2007 as a pet project of Harry Reid. https://t.co/iW4cksDxfq

The Pentagon has acknowledged a secret program to investigate UFOs. It began in 2007 as a pet project of Harry Reid. http://nyti.ms/2AY9BD3 

Videos show an encounter between a Navy Super Hornet and an unknown object.

Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program

The shadowy program began in 2007 and was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader, who has had a longtime interest in space phenomena.

Immediately, the long-persecuted Tin Foil Hat UFO people proclaimed “Victory!” and “Disclosure!” and popped champagne bottles all the next day. Never mind that there was no confirmation over whether the craft was from “out there” or “in here.” Never mind that the N.Y. Times, the Pentagon, and the Deep State in general exist for the sole purpose of lying to the public all the time. Never mind that Carol Rosin told us there’d be days like this.

A paradigm shift is happening. The first official USG footage of UAP\u2019s are now available to watch on the new TTS Academy community of interest https://t.co/ieyTvzagOj. pic.twitter.com/Pe8VCrEDDH

View image on Twitter

A paradigm shift is happening. The first official USG footage of UAP’s are now available to watch on the new TTS Academy community of interest http://coi.tothestarsacademy.com .

The truth is out there. 🛸

Seriously. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html 

Videos show an encounter between a Navy Super Hornet and an unknown object.

Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program

The shadowy program began in 2007 and was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader, who has had a longtime interest in space phenomena.

A few of us will once again pick up the torture stake and remind the public that if a person has lied to you 99 times, the odds are pretty good that his 100th story will also not be in your best interests. Not to mention the fact that we’ve got a slug like John Podesta trumpeting the news as well.

Lift the veil. Thanks @SenatorReid. #TheTruthIsOutThere #ToTheStars https://t.co/duyocSHJXJ

Lift the veil. Thanks @SenatorReid http://nyti.ms/2AFSy46 

Videos show an encounter between a Navy Super Hornet and an unknown object.

Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program

The shadowy program began in 2007 and was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader, who has had a longtime interest in space phenomena. 

Indeed, Catherine Austin Fitts was quick to remark to “Dark Journalist” that the “UFO Disclosure” came oddly on the heels of Trump’s announcement that the DoD will finally get audited [linked here]. Ms. Fitts reminded us: “If you’re about to sign a $700 billion budget, with a $56 million increase for the DoD, I can see why you wouldn’t want $21 trillion missing!” With a first-of-its-kind audit looming in the near future, the Deep State has to start coming up with some public excuse for where all the money went. CAF and Dark Journalist will have much more to say on that topic next month.

Interview with Dark Journalist on the latest missing money excuse – “Mommy, mommy, the aliens made me do it!” Why do GS guys need big $ if it is all rigged with gov’t $? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00JwQkINIaw 

Read More: https://www.roguemoney.net/blog/2017/12/27/the-last-card-is-the-aliens

 

DARPA Exposed

The internet. GPS. Windows. Videoconferencing. Siri. Smart dust. Why isn’t it common knowledge that these technologies started as DARPA-funded projects? When the government, defense contractors and tech giants team up to create the next generation of military technology, who wins and who loses? Find out on tonight’s broadcast.

WORKS CITED:

Army of Extreme Thinkers

12 Insane But True DARPA Projects

Fifty years of DARPA: Hits, misses and ones to watch

FANG Challenge: Design a Next-Generation Military Ground Vehicle

10 brilliant DARPA inventions

Director of DARPA departs Pentagon for Google

High-Traffic Colluding Tor Routers in Washington

Creepy DARPA Robots

Future World – Smart Dust

Berkeley Smart Dust Project

DARPA Project List

How the U.S. Dictatorship Works

1984 big brother

A recent article in the Washington Post described how the current US tax-‘reform’ bill is being shaped; and it describes, basically (at least as far as tax-law changes are concerned), the operation of a US dictatorship by the super-rich.

First of all, however: there is no longer any realistic question as regards whether the US in recent decades has been a dictatorship, or instead a democracy. According to the only scientific analysis of the relevant data, that has been done in order to determine whether the US is a dictatorship or a democracy, the US is definitely a dictatorship that’s perpetrated by the extremely richest, against the public-at-large; in other words: the US Government functions as an aristocracy, otherwise referred-to as an oligarchy, or a plutocracy, or a kleptocracy; but, in any case, and by whatever name, it’s ruled by a tiny number of the extremely wealthiest and their agents, on behalf of those few super-rich, against the concerns and interests and needs of the public (everyone else). So: instead of being rule by the public (the “demos” is the Greek term for it), it’s rule on behalf of a tiny dictatorial class, of extreme wealth — by whatever name we might happen to label this ruling class.

That study, by professors Gilens and Page, explained that it examined “1,779 instances between 1981 and 2002 in which a national survey of the general public asked a favor/oppose question about a proposed policy change,” and it compared those public-policy preferences, by the public, versus the public-policy preferences regarding those same issues, by the super-wealthiest; and, it found that only the public-policy preferences by the super-wealthiest and their paid agents, made any discernible difference, at all, in the likelihood that a given public policy ultimately became enacted into law, in the United States. Whereas the public-policy preferences of the wealthiest do, at far higher than mere random chances, become enacted into laws, the public-policy preferences of the public are (except in political rhetoric and promises — frauds perpetrated to deceive the public) ignored, in the United States.

Here is an excellent six-minute video describing the methodology and findings in that landmark study, and here is a commentary by former US President Jimmy Carter, in which he says that he knows it’s true.  He said this not on the basis of examining thousands of cases and doing the statistical analysis of the data, like Gilens and Page had done, but just on the basis of his observations of how the US federal government has been functioning in recent decades. And, of course, the scientific study is vastly more reliable than is any individual’s mere opinion about the matter.

Furthermore, there exists evidence that even in some local or state governments in the United States, considerable corruption exists, and therefore an extreme slant prevails in favor of the rich. During June 2016, I headlined about this, “Here Is How Corrupt America Is”, and opened:

The best reporting on the depth of America’s dictatorship is probably that being done by Atlanta Georgia’s NBC-affiliated, Gannett-owned, TV Channel “11 Alive,” WXIA television, its “The Investigators” series of local investigative news reports, which show, up close and at a cellularly detailed level, the way things actually work in today’s America. Although it’s only local, it displays what meets the legal standards of the US federal government in actually any state in the union; so, it exposes the character of the US government, such that what’s shown to be true here, meets America’s standard for ‘democracy’, or else the federal government isn’t enforcing federal laws against it (which is the same thing as its meeting the federal government’s standards).

The links to three of these local TV news reports will be provided, along with a summary of each of the videos; and then the broader context will be provided, which ties the local picture in with the national, and then the resulting international, picture. So: this will be like a zoom-lens view, starting with three selected close-ups, and then broadening the view to wide-angle, showing the context in terms of which what’s happening in that fine detail (those close-up views) makes sense.

What was exemplified in this reporting by that excellent investigative team could be called “corporate organized-gangsterism,” and this gangsterism was being led by an operation, “ALEC,” that was founded by politicians whose careers are funded by the Koch brothers and some other US billionaires.

Furthermore, as was mentioned briefly at the opening here, a recent issue of the Washington Post’s “PowerPost” section was titled “The Finance 202: Tax overhaul’s big test comes now”, and it described in detail what was shaping the Trump Administration’s tax-overhaul bill. This article reported that the lobbyists were shaping it 100%. It’s a superb nitty-gritty, down among the weeds, description, of the monetary deals, the horse-trading, that were being made, not only for corporations, but for the wealthiest non-business lobbies, including ‘nonprofit’ ones, but almost all of these lobbies, too, depend overwhelmingly upon billionaires for their funding. What’s being carved-up and served, is being carved-up from governments, and being served to the super-rich. (After all: conservatives say “Government bad, business good,” and Republicans are the conservative Party; so, it’s taking from government, and going to business.)

So: is it any wonder why Gilens and Page found what they did? They found that “economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.” (By “mass-based groups” was being referenced what the left often calls “movements” or “grass-roots” organizations. After all, what happened from “Occupy Wall Street”? Nothing. It was a big waste of time and effort. Authentic movements get marginalized, because the billionaires’ ‘news’media despise them. Fake ones, such as the Kochs’ “The Tea Party ‘movement’,” get weaponized, because the billionaires’ ‘news’media treat them extensively, and often grant them respect. Top-down’s the way, in any dictatorship. That includes in America.)

Here is another excellent video — this one 10 minutes long — summarizing the Gilens and Page study.

The only major difference between Republican politicians and Democratic ones, then, is that, whereas Republican ones don’t even need to pretend that they oppose limitless greed (since limitless greed that’s carried out by frauds instead of by outright physical violence — which latter type of coercion is the type that’s employed more by lower-class crooks, anyway, and those are the type of crooks who fill our prisons, not the type who fill our boardrooms — is, essentially, supported by Republicans’ ideology, as ‘being entrepreneurial’ and ‘competitive spirit’), Democratic politicians do need to make that pretense (since their voters are liberals, and liberals don’t share the conservatives’ “Greed is good” libertarian faith). But the outcomes, even when Democrats are in power, are vastly more helpful to the billionaires, than to the public.

Does this mean that Democratic (or liberal) politicians are necessarily more hypocritical than Republican ones are? No. Whereas Democrats pretend to be opposed to the system’s favoring the super-rich, Republicans pretend to be opposed to “sins” and other religious-based shiboleths. Both Parties can win and retain power only by deceiving (defrauding) the public, and serving the billionaires, though in different ways — some conservative, and some liberal. Virtually everything else than that service to billionaires (and to centi-millionaires) is just frauds by politicians, because, at least after around 1970, only the richest 1% or (usually far) less are actually being served by the US federal Government. It’s not the billionaires that are defrauded by politicians; it is clearly the public that is being defrauded by them.

The public are served only to the extent that the public’s interests are the same as the billionaires’ interests. And the Gilens and Page study found that the public’s policy-preferences are simply ignored — not ignored in the political rhetoric, but ignored in the political outcomes.

The US Government, thus, is of a few people (the policymakers), by the billionaires, and for the billionaires. And that’s just an established fact.

Read More: https://www.strategic-culture.org/pview/2017/12/03/how-us-dictatorship-works.html

John Lennon Was Right: The Government Is Run by Maniacs for Maniacal Means

John Lennon lyrics for the elites "Bring On The Lucie (Freda Peeple)"
John Lennon lyrics for the elites
“Bring On The Lucie (Freda Peeple)”

Not much has changed in the 37 years since John Lennon was gunned down by an assassin’s bullet.

All of the many complaints we have about government today—surveillance, corruption, harassment, political persecution, spying, overcriminalization, etc.—were used against Lennon, who never refrained from speaking truth to power and calling for social justice, peace and a populist revolution.

Little wonder, then, that the U.S. government saw Lennon as enemy number one.

A prime example of the lengths to which the U.S. government will go to persecute those who dare to challenge its authority, Lennon was the subject of a four-year campaign of surveillance and harassment by the U.S. government (spearheaded by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover), in an attempt by President Richard Nixon to have him “neutralized” and deported. As Adam Cohen of the New York Times points out, “The F.B.I.’s surveillance of Lennon is a reminder of how easily domestic spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law enforcement purpose.”

Years after Lennon’s assassination, it would be revealed that the FBI had collected 281 pages of surveillance files on him. As the New York Times notes, “Critics of today’s domestic surveillance object largely on privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try to hold on to power. ‘The U.S. vs. John Lennon’ … is the story not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being undermined.”

Such government-directed harassment was nothing new.

The FBI has had a long history of persecuting, prosecuting and generally harassing activists, politicians, and cultural figures, including Martin Luther King Jr.

In Lennon’s case, the ex-Beatle saw that his music could mobilize the public and help to bring about change. Yet while Lennon believed in the power of the people, he also understood the danger of a power-hungry government. “The trouble with government as it is, is that it doesn’t represent the people,” observed Lennon. “It controls them.”

By March 1971, when his “Power to the People” single was released, it was clear that Lennon was ready to participate in political activism against the U. S. government, the “monster” that was financing the war in Vietnam.

The release of Lennon’s Sometime in New York City album, which contained a radical anti-government message in virtually every song, only fanned the flames of the government’s war on Lennon.

In 1972, Nixon had the ex-Beatle served with deportation orders “in an effort to silence him as a voice of the peace movement.” Despite the fact that Lennon was not plotting to bring down the Nixon Administration, as the government feared, the government persisted in its efforts to have him deported. Equally determined to resist, Lennon dug in and fought back. Finally, in 1976, Lennon won the battle to stay in the country. By 1980, the old radical was back and ready to cause trouble.

Unfortunately, Lennon’s time as a troublemaker was short-lived.

Mark David Chapman was waiting in the shadows on Dec. 8, 1980, just as Lennon was returning to his New York apartment building. As Lennon stepped outside the car to greet the fans congregating outside, Chapman dropped into a two-handed combat stance, emptied his .38-caliber pistol and pumped four hollow-point bullets into Lennon’s back and left arm.

John Lennon was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital.

Much like Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy and others who have died attempting to challenge the powers-that-be, Lennon had finally been “neutralized.”

Yet Lennon’s legacy lives on in his words, his music and his efforts to speak truth to power.

Even so, his work to change the world for the better is far from done.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, peace remains out of reach. Activists and whistleblowers continue to be prosecuted for challenging the government’s authority. Militarism is on the rise, all the while the governmental war machine continues to wreak havoc on innocent lives. And those who do dare to speak up are labeled dissidents, troublemakers, terrorists, lunatics, or mentally ill and tagged for surveillance, censorship or, worse, involuntary detention.

As Lennon shared in a 1968 interview:

I think all our society is run by insane people for insane objectives… I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal means. If anybody can put on paper what our government and the American government and the Russian… Chinese… what they are actually trying to do, and what they think they’re doing, I’d be very pleased to know what they think they’re doing. I think they’re all insane. But I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it.”

So what’s the answer?

Lennon had a multitude of suggestions.

“If everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then there’d be peace.”

“Produce your own dream. If you want to save Peru, go save Peru. It’s quite possible to do anything, but not to put it on the leaders….You have to do it yourself.”

“Peace is not something you wish for; It’s something you make, Something you do, Something you are, And something you give away.”

“War is over, if you want it.”

In other words, fighting the evil of the American police state can only come about by way of conscious thoughts that are put into action.

Do you want an end to war? Then stop supporting the government’s military campaigns. Do you want government violence against the citizenry to end? Then demand that your local police de-militarize. Do you want a restoration of your freedoms? You’ll have to get the government to recognize that “we the people” are the masters in this relationship and government employees are our public servants.

The choice is ours.

The power (if we want it), as Lennon recognized, is in our hands.

“The people have the power, all we have to do is awaken that power in the people,” concluded Lennon. “The people are unaware. They’re not educated to realize that they have power. The system is so geared that everyone believes the government will fix everything. We are the government.”

For the moment, the choice is still ours: slavery or freedom, war or peace, death or life.

The point at which we have no choice is the point at which the monsters—the maniacs, the powers-that-be, the Deep State—win.

As Lennon warned, “You either get tired fighting for peace, or you die.”

Read More: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-12/john-lennon-was-right-governent-run-maniacs-maniacal-means

Every Single Cognitive Bias in One Infographic

JEFF DESJARDINS
September 25, 2017

View a high resolution version of this graphic
Cognitive Bias Infographic

 

The human brain is capable of incredible things, but it’s also extremely flawed at times.

Science has shown that we tend to make all sorts of mental mistakes, called “cognitive biases”, that can affect both our thinking and actions. These biases can lead to us extrapolating information from the wrong sources, seeking to confirm existing beliefs, or failing to remember events the way they actually happened!

To be sure, this is all part of being human – but such cognitive biases can also have a profound effect on our endeavors, investments, and life in general. For this reason, today’s infographic from DesignHacks.co is particularly handy. It shows and groups each of the 188 known confirmation biases in existence.

WHAT IS A COGNITIVE BIAS?

Humans tend to think in certain ways that can lead to systematic deviations from making rational judgments.

These tendencies usually arise from:

  • Information processing shortcuts
  • The limited processing ability of the brain
  • Emotional and moral motivations
  • Distortions in storing and retrieving memories
  • Social influence

Cognitive biases have been studied for decades by academics in the fields of cognitive science, social psychology, and behavioral economics, but they are especially relevant in today’s information-packed world. They influence the way we think and act, and such irrational mental shortcuts can lead to all kinds of problems in entrepreneurship, investing, or management.

COGNITIVE BIAS EXAMPLES

Here are four examples of how these types of biases can affect people in the business world:

Familiarity Bias: An investor puts her money in “what she knows”, rather than seeking the obvious benefits from portfolio diversification. Just because a certain type of industry or security is familiar doesn’t make it the logical selection.

Self-Attribution Bias: An entrepreneur overly attributes his company’s success to himself, rather than other factors (team, luck, industry trends). When things go bad, he blames these external factors for derailing his progress.

Anchoring Bias: An employee in a salary negotiation is too dependent on the first number mentioned in the negotiations, rather than rationally examining a range of options.

Survivorship Bias: Entrepreneurship looks easy, because there are so many successful entrepreneurs out there. However, this is a cognitive bias: the successful entrepreneurs are the ones still around, while the millions who failed went and did other things.