Pearl Harbor: Yet Another False-Flag: FDR Knew

FDR foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor to Get the US into World War 2

Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not

Written by  James Perloff

Comprehensive research has shown not only that Washington knew in advance of the attack, but that it deliberately withheld its foreknowledge from our commanders in Hawaii in the hope that the “surprise” attack would catapult the U.S. into World War II. Oliver Lyttleton, British Minister of Production, stated in 1944: “Japan was provoked into attacking America at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty of history to say that America was forced into the war.”

Although FDR desired to directly involve the United States in the Second World War, his intentions sharply contradicted his public pronouncements. A pre-war Gallup poll showed 88 percent of Americans opposed U.S. involvement in the European war. Citizens realized that U.S. participation in World War I had not made a better world, and in a 1940 (election-year) speech, Roosevelt typically stated: “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”

But privately, the president planned the opposite. Roosevelt dispatched his closest advisor, Harry Hopkins, to meet British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in January 1941. Hopkins told Churchill: “The President is determined that we [the United States and England] shall win the war together. Make no mistake about it. He has sent me here to tell you that at all costs and by all means he will carry you through, no matter what happens to him — there is nothing he will not do so far as he has human power.” William Stevenson noted in A Man Called Intrepid that American-British military staff talks began that same month under “utmost secrecy,” which, he clarified, “meant preventing disclosure to the American public.” Even Robert Sherwood, the president’s friendly biographer, said: “If the isolationists had known the full extent of the secret alliance between the United States and Britain, their demands for impeachment would have rumbled like thunder throughout the land.”

Read More: https://www.thenewamerican.com/component/k2/item/4740-pearl-harbor-hawaii-was-surprised-fdr-was-not

Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor?

Robert B. StinnettDouglas Cirignano  |  March 11, 2002

according to Robert Stinnett, author of Simon & Schuster’s Day Of Deceit, we have the proof. Stinnett’s book is dedicated to Congressman John Moss, the author of America’s Freedom of Information Act. According to Stinnett, the answers to the mysteries of Pearl Harbor can be found in the extraordinary number of documents he was able to attain through Freedom of Information Act requests. Cable after cable of decryptions, scores of military messages that America was intercepting, clearly showed that Japanese ships were preparing for war and heading straight for Hawaii. Stinnett, an author, journalist, and World War II veteran, spent sixteen years delving into the National Archives. He poured over more than 200,000 documents, and conducted dozens of interviews. This meticulous research led Stinnet to a firmly held conclusion: FDR knew.

Read More: http://www.independent.org/issues/article.asp?id=408


Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt Knew

by  Posted on 

The truth is that, by the winter of 1941, the Americans had decrypted the various Japanese military and diplomatic codes: President Roosevelt, key members of his cabinet, and top military leaders, including Gen. George C. Marshall, US Army chief of staff, had access to this intelligence, which was intercepted, decoded, and transmitted directly to them. We know this because Robert Stinnett, in researching his seminal book, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, obtained heretofore unknown documents under the Freedom of Information Act, which trace the intelligence stream from interception stations throughout the Pacific to the 36 Americans cleared to look through what was, in effect, a window into Japanese plans and preparations for the Pearl Harbor attack. The President and 35 other Americans in top political and military circles knew where the attack was to take place, they knew when it was to take place, and they watched it unfold, step by step, with full knowledge of its import.

It is widely remarked that even on the eve of Pearl Harbor, the vast majority of the American people stubbornly resisted efforts to drag us into the European war. The Court Historians responsible for constructing the FDR cult would have had great difficulty denying the pattern of presidential prevarication that had us effectively fighting the Axis powers long before war was officially declared. So instead of taking on this impossible task, which would have been laughed out of court, they openly valorized him for his expertise at the art of deception. Thomas Bailey, who taught history at Stanford University for 40 years and authored The American Pageant, long a standard US history textbook, extolled the liar and his lie in his 1948 book, The Man in the Street: The Impact of American Public Opinion on Foreign Policy

Read More: https://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/12/06/pearl-harbor-roosevelt-knew/

9/11 – Brief Summary of Evidence Supporting Controlled Demolition of Twin Towers

Remember that report published by a globalist, neocon organization called The Project for a New American Century that said America needs “a new Pearl Harbor?”

9/11 revisited – A brief summary of the evidence supporting controlled demolition as the cause of the total symmetrical free-fall collapses of the Twin Towers (and Building 7). This video contains a portion of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film “September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor” (below) by film maker Massimo Mazzucco, which investigates in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks.

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 2 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…

September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 3 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…

Keeping 9/11 Secret – Former British MI5 Officer on how it’s Possible – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ouof…

9/11 Collapses Violated Fundamental Laws of Physics – Explained – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVHW…

9/11 – What Happened to the Passengers? – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGB9A…

Nano-thermite –

“Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives”  [https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html ] : …”Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together….In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. “These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius,” [6,332 degrees F] says Simpson….The [Lawrence] Livermore team has successfully synthesized metal oxide gels from a myriad elements.”…

MIT Technology Review – https://www.technologyreview.com/s/40… : “Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos…’Superthermites can increase the (chemical) reaction time by a thousand times,’ Son says, resulting in a very rapid reactive wave.” .

Unreacted Nano-thermite “chips” made up of iron oxide, aluminum, silicon, and carbon, were discovered in the dust from the WTC building collapses by independent researchers. When tested these tiny chips exhibited the properties of Nano-thermite and were definitely not chips of “primer paint” that debunkers claimed them to be. Nano-thermite is a very sophisticated military grade incendiary, so how did it get there?

Keeping 9/11 Secret – Former British MI5 Officer on how it’s Possible

9/11 revisited – In attempting to debunk the idea that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, the argument is often espoused that “with so many people who would have been involved, it would be impossible to keep it a secret – somebody would have talked.” That is not necessarily the case, as former British MI5 officer Annie Machon describes in this video: “…there might be one or two people who have the over-all picture, and then other people would have compartmentalized views of what happened…it’s very much a “need to know.”

“…even if it were the case that thousands of people were involved in something illegal on 9/11 that came out of the American administration – the American government – they would probably keep quiet. Where would their interest lie in going public about it? One, it would certainly ruin their livelihood, and it might well jeopardize other things, up to and including their lives. So those are strong incentives to keep quiet if you’re involved in those sorts of things.”

In addition, if a false-flag operation took place during same-day drills for the same kind of attack (9/11 and London’s 7/7 drills), most people involved would be simply performing their normal duties.

Former British MI5 Officer on False Flag Ops and 9/11 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZsxH…

Do you have questions about 9/11? This excellent 5 hour investigative film examines in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks:

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 2 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…

“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 3 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…

The FBI Creates Their Own Terrorists

FBI-logo

Demetrius Pitts charged in Cleveland bomb plot after FBI sting

There’s no indication the Ohio man could have carried off an attack himself.
Tracy Connor / 

“…An FBI informant provided Pitts with a bus pass so he could get to downtown Cleveland to take photos of bombing targets. He allegedly pledged allegiance to terrorist leaders in videos made with a cellphone — which was also provided by the FBI. His passcode for the phone wasn’t exactly a stumper: 0704, the date of the supposed attack….”

Read More: https://www.nbcnews.com/

The Arab Spring was not a “grass roots,” “organic” uprising.

The Arab Spring was instigated by the influence of foreign NGOs claiming to be “grass roots”, but they were funded by corporations and billionaires for the purpose of regime changes and resource redistribution the highest bidder.

Just Watering the Patsies

U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings

Who Cares About 17 Years of Drone Bombings – Now We Care About the Children

An Iraqi woman and her children amidst a US missile strike
An Iraqi woman and her children amidst a US missile strike

The Entire Western World Lives In Cognitive Dissonance

Let us begin with the family separation issue. The separation of children from immigrant/refugee/asylum parents has caused such public outcry that President Trump has backed off his policy and signed an executive order terminating family separation.

The horror of children locked up in warehouses operated by private businesses making a profit off of US taxpayers, while parents are prosecuted for illegal entry, woke even self-satisfied “exceptional and indispensable” Americans out of their stupor. It is a mystery that the Trump regime chose to discredit its border enforcement policy by separating families. Perhaps the policy was intended to deter illegal immigration by sending the message that if you come to America your children will be taken from you.

The question is: How is it that Americans can see and reject the inhumane border control policy and not see the inhumanity of family destruction that has been the over-riding result of Washington’s destruction in whole or part of seven or eight countries in the 21st century?

Millions of people have been separated from families by death inflicted by Washington, and for almost two decades protests have been almost nonexistent. No public outcry stopped George W. Bush, Obama, and Trump from clear and indisputable illegal acts defined in international law established by the US itself as war crimes against the inhabitants of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia. We can add to this an eighth example: The military attacks by the US armed and supported neo-Nazi puppet state of Ukraine against the breakaway Russian provinces.

Read More: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/06/21/entire-western-world-lives-cognitive-dissonance/

The Media Increases School Shootings By Immortalizing The Perpetrators

March for Our Lies

School shootings remain uniquely attractive because the media gives shooters a massive platform to air their hateful views.

By 
 22, 2018

The Sante Fe High School shooting was a horrific tragedy, but it was also a sadly predictable affair.

A socially isolated white man takes out his rage on his school. The media, appalled, tries to study what went wrong. Some blame guns. Some blame toxic masculinity. All repeat the name of the shooter, over and over again, until his name, and his deranged views, become as embedded in the public consciousness as any celebrity. The public commentariat abides by a cultural script that spins the shootings into one partisan direction or another, allowing the acts of violence to completely dominate our news cycle, across airwaves and headlines. In a sad perverse way, the shooters get exactly what they wanted — attention.

And the cycle of shoot, rinse, repeat, continues.

Over the past 20 years, news media have failed to balance their investigative natures with concerns about legitimizing the views and lifestyles of people whose world views do not deserve to be heard. One of the first articles in The Washington Post to accompany the actual news of the Santa Fe shooting was a lengthy profile of the perpetrator, the headline saying that he had a “fondness for trench coats and a growing darkness.” From Santa Fe, to Parkland, to Charleston, to Aurora and Virginia Tech, the news media can’t help but elevate the platforms of deranged men by publishing their sick, twisted views.

Read More: http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/22/media-increases-school-shootings-immortalizing-perpetrators/

With Legalized Propaganda, How Do You Know What They’re Saying is True?

Mass Shootings Caused by the FBI

HOW TO SPOT A FALSE FLAG IN A POST REPEAL SMITH-MUNDT ERA

Written by Sebastian Swift entitled “5 Confirmed False Flag Operations And How To Spot Them In The Future.”

The false flag phenomenon is distinctively modern and used as an ideological weapon to control populations with the fear of a manufactured enemy. They are used in ostensibly democratic systems where people believe they have inalienable rights. Such democratic systems–primarily the United States, Israel, and Great Britain–must shock people into sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as such, require sophisticated modern propaganda systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills.”- Swift

Signs of a False Flag Operation: 

  • There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience. In his lecture at Contact in the Desert, [author and researcher] Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing characteristic of a false flag operation is that the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the media. There are often legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the wings, which the government can immediately implement.
  • The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body. The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for countless civil liberty infringements by the national security state, including ubiquitous domestic surveillance and indefinite detention.
  • The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. For example, many of the recent domestic terror attacks, including the Aurora [and Orlando] shooting[s], have exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun control legislation.
  • Military training drills and police drills occur on the day of and very near the attack itself, causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. This is no small point. An incredible percentage of major domestic or international terror attacks have involved simultaneous “training drills.” This list includes, but is not limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11, the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and the Boston Marathon. Though none of the aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance to previous false flag attacks and should be looked at with an investigative eye.
Lets now tie in the repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act which ends the ban on domestic propaganda in 2013. 

Evidence of Explosives at Ground Zero: Families Petition for New Investigation

911 Explosive Evidence

Citing ‘Conclusive Evidence’ of Explosives, Families of Victims File Petition to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

The evidence cited in the petition includes a scientific analysis of the dust samples from the scene, which showed the presence of high-tech explosives and incendiaries.

By John Vibes – April 25, 2018

This month, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, a group representing families of the 9/11 victims, filed a petition with the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to push for an investigation into the crimes of 9/11. The committee states that they have “conclusive” evidence that explosives were planted and detonated in the trade center buildings, and that this is the actual reason for the collapse of the towers.

According to the 52-page petition, which is accompanied by 57 exhibits, federal statute requires the U.S. Department of Justice to review the evidence with a special grand jury. The petition states:

“The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries . . . on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.”

The evidence that is put forward in the petition includes the following:

  • Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate.
  • Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts on the WTC Towers, and prior to the building collapses.
  • Technical analysis of video evidence of the WTC building collapses.
  • Firefighter reports of explosions, and of seeing “molten iron like in a foundry.” The petition states that the presence of molten iron would require temperatures higher than jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, but consistent with the use of the high tech explosive and incendiary thermite or thermate.
  • The presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is another phenomenon that would be scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone.
  • Video and eyewitness testimony of the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally from the buildings which would not be possible from a gravity collapse.
  • Scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirming sulfidation and high-temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity collapse but consistent with the use of thermate and high explosives.

None of the evidence put forward in the petition was presented or considered in the “9/11 commission,” which was initially appointed to investigate the collapse of the towers. In the years since the attacks, the commission has been exposed as a fraud, with many of its own members speaking out against the official story.

According to a 2006 report from the Washington Post, most of the people who oversaw this commission believed they were being lied to, and even held a secret meeting about referring the matter to the Department of Justice.

Read More: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/9-11-families-request-doj-grand-jury-to-reinvestigate-911/

March For Our Lives Protest was Approved by DC Police Months Before the Shooting by the Same Organizers as the Women’s March

Joe Biden, Emma Gonzales, and David Hogg
What it’s like to now have “the machine” using you from behind.

INNOCENT EMAIL THROWS #NEVERAGAIN NARRATIVE INTO QUESTION

The power of youth, eh? It’s a charming narrative. But let’s read on.

A Revealing Email

On March 30, blogger Dr. Eowyn wrote a post on the ‘Fellowship of the Minds’ website that suggests that plans for the demonstrations were initiated long before the Parkland shooting. The evidence? A statement in an email sent to a source of European researcher Ole Dammegard by Officer Scott C. Earhardt of the Homeland Security Bureau of the Metropolitan Police Department:

In reference to your inquiry concerning the March For Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual eventand there was several months of planning for this large event.

If a permit application for the march was received several months prior to the actual event, of course, then the notion that ‘March For Our Lives’ sprung from a spontaneous grass-roots initiative by high school students is completely destroyed. But not just that. It also gives added weight to suspicions that the entire Parkland shooting was a false flag event.

Read More: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/04/06/innocent-email-throws-neveragain-narrative-into-question/