Did you know the US Patriot Act was first introduced after the OKC bombing but was rejected by Congress at the time.
Well, where once they failed, they tried again on 9-11 and got it passed that time.
Attempted bombing suspect’s family issues statement
August 16, 2017
Family members of Jerry Drake Varnell issued a statement late Tuesday night regarding his involvement in Saturday’s attempted bombing of a downtown Oklahoma City bank building.
“We as a family are extremely distraught about this situation with our son Jerry Drake Varnell, but what the public must understand is that he is a paranoid schizophrenic and is extremely susceptible to different types of ideology that normal people would deem immoral….
What the public should be looking at is the fact that the FBI gave our son the means to make this happen. He has no job, no money, no vehicle, and no driver’s license, due to the fact that he is schizophrenic and we; his parents do everything we can possible to keep him safe and functional. The mental health system has consistently failed us due to the lack of establishments and health care coverage for a person like him. He has attended college and just enrolled in welding school. His medications allow him to be somewhat functional but he will never be completely functional in life. His brain does not work like a normal person and never will due to the nature of his mental illness. He has suffered through countless serious full-blown schizophrenic delusional episodes and he has been put in numerous mental hospitals since he was 16 years old. The FBI came and picked him up from our home, they gave him a vehicle, gave him a fake bomb, and every means to make this happen none of which he had access to on his own. We know who their informant is and what the public should know is that he is that a drug-dealing criminal. On June 15, 2017, Jerry’s Father told the criminal informant “that he was not allowed back on our property and if he returned we would have him arrested for trespassing and drugs”. Apparently, he continued to sneak onto our residence. The FBI paid him to continue this operation and I believe they have cleared his criminal record.
The FBI should have filed conspiracy on our son and had him committed to a mental institution. They should not have aided and abetted a paranoid schizophrenic to commit this act. There are many more facts that I will not make public that will support my son and the disturbing acts made by the FBI.
Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not
Written by James Perloff
Comprehensive research has shown not only that Washington knew in advance of the attack, but that it deliberately withheld its foreknowledge from our commanders in Hawaii in the hope that the “surprise” attack would catapult the U.S. into World War II. Oliver Lyttleton, British Minister of Production, stated in 1944: “Japan was provoked into attacking America at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty of history to say that America was forced into the war.”
Although FDR desired to directly involve the United States in the Second World War, his intentions sharply contradicted his public pronouncements. A pre-war Gallup poll showed 88 percent of Americans opposed U.S. involvement in the European war. Citizens realized that U.S. participation in World War I had not made a better world, and in a 1940 (election-year) speech, Roosevelt typically stated: “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”
But privately, the president planned the opposite. Roosevelt dispatched his closest advisor, Harry Hopkins, to meet British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in January 1941. Hopkins told Churchill: “The President is determined that we [the United States and England] shall win the war together. Make no mistake about it. He has sent me here to tell you that at all costs and by all means he will carry you through, no matter what happens to him — there is nothing he will not do so far as he has human power.” William Stevenson noted in A Man Called Intrepid that American-British military staff talks began that same month under “utmost secrecy,” which, he clarified, “meant preventing disclosure to the American public.” Even Robert Sherwood, the president’s friendly biographer, said: “If the isolationists had known the full extent of the secret alliance between the United States and Britain, their demands for impeachment would have rumbled like thunder throughout the land.”
Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor?
according to Robert Stinnett, author of Simon & Schuster’s Day Of Deceit, we have the proof. Stinnett’s book is dedicated to Congressman John Moss, the author of America’s Freedom of Information Act. According to Stinnett, the answers to the mysteries of Pearl Harbor can be found in the extraordinary number of documents he was able to attain through Freedom of Information Act requests. Cable after cable of decryptions, scores of military messages that America was intercepting, clearly showed that Japanese ships were preparing for war and heading straight for Hawaii. Stinnett, an author, journalist, and World War II veteran, spent sixteen years delving into the National Archives. He poured over more than 200,000 documents, and conducted dozens of interviews. This meticulous research led Stinnet to a firmly held conclusion: FDR knew.
Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt Knew
by Justin Raimondo Posted on
The truth is that, by the winter of 1941, the Americans had decrypted the various Japanese military and diplomatic codes: President Roosevelt, key members of his cabinet, and top military leaders, including Gen. George C. Marshall, US Army chief of staff, had access to this intelligence, which was intercepted, decoded, and transmitted directly to them. We know this because Robert Stinnett, in researching his seminal book, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, obtained heretofore unknown documents under the Freedom of Information Act, which trace the intelligence stream from interception stations throughout the Pacific to the 36 Americans cleared to look through what was, in effect, a window into Japanese plans and preparations for the Pearl Harbor attack. The President and 35 other Americans in top political and military circles knew where the attack was to take place, they knew when it was to take place, and they watched it unfold, step by step, with full knowledge of its import.
It is widely remarked that even on the eve of Pearl Harbor, the vast majority of the American people stubbornly resisted efforts to drag us into the European war. The Court Historians responsible for constructing the FDR cult would have had great difficulty denying the pattern of presidential prevarication that had us effectively fighting the Axis powers long before war was officially declared. So instead of taking on this impossible task, which would have been laughed out of court, they openly valorized him for his expertise at the art of deception. Thomas Bailey, who taught history at Stanford University for 40 years and authored The American Pageant, long a standard US history textbook, extolled the liar and his lie in his 1948 book, The Man in the Street: The Impact of American Public Opinion on Foreign Policy
Remember that report published by a globalist, neocon organization called The Project for a New American Century that said America needs “a new Pearl Harbor?”
9/11 revisited – A brief summary of the evidence supporting controlled demolition as the cause of the total symmetrical free-fall collapses of the Twin Towers (and Building 7). This video contains a portion of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film “September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor” (below) by film maker Massimo Mazzucco, which investigates in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks.
September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…
September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 2 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…
September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 3 of 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…
Keeping 9/11 Secret – Former British MI5 Officer on how it’s Possible – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ouof…
9/11 Collapses Violated Fundamental Laws of Physics – Explained – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVHW…
9/11 – What Happened to the Passengers? – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGB9A…
“Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives” [https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html ] : …”Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together….In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. “These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius,” [6,332 degrees F] says Simpson….The [Lawrence] Livermore team has successfully synthesized metal oxide gels from a myriad elements.”…
MIT Technology Review – https://www.technologyreview.com/s/40… : “Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos…’Superthermites can increase the (chemical) reaction time by a thousand times,’ Son says, resulting in a very rapid reactive wave.” .
Unreacted Nano-thermite “chips” made up of iron oxide, aluminum, silicon, and carbon, were discovered in the dust from the WTC building collapses by independent researchers. When tested these tiny chips exhibited the properties of Nano-thermite and were definitely not chips of “primer paint” that debunkers claimed them to be. Nano-thermite is a very sophisticated military grade incendiary, so how did it get there?
9/11 revisited – In attempting to debunk the idea that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, the argument is often espoused that “with so many people who would have been involved, it would be impossible to keep it a secret – somebody would have talked.” That is not necessarily the case, as former British MI5 officer Annie Machon describes in this video: “…there might be one or two people who have the over-all picture, and then other people would have compartmentalized views of what happened…it’s very much a “need to know.”
“…even if it were the case that thousands of people were involved in something illegal on 9/11 that came out of the American administration – the American government – they would probably keep quiet. Where would their interest lie in going public about it? One, it would certainly ruin their livelihood, and it might well jeopardize other things, up to and including their lives. So those are strong incentives to keep quiet if you’re involved in those sorts of things.”
In addition, if a false-flag operation took place during same-day drills for the same kind of attack (9/11 and London’s 7/7 drills), most people involved would be simply performing their normal duties.
Former British MI5 Officer on False Flag Ops and 9/11 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZsxH…
Do you have questions about 9/11? This excellent 5 hour investigative film examines in detail the anomalies of the 9/11 attacks:
“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full version) – Part 1 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ppQ…
“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 2 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahPo6…
“September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor (Full Version) – Part 3 of 3” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haVF4…
Demetrius Pitts charged in Cleveland bomb plot after FBI sting
“…An FBI informant provided Pitts with a bus pass so he could get to downtown Cleveland to take photos of bombing targets. He allegedly pledged allegiance to terrorist leaders in videos made with a cellphone — which was also provided by the FBI. His passcode for the phone wasn’t exactly a stumper: 0704, the date of the supposed attack….”
Read More: https://www.nbcnews.com/
The Arab Spring was instigated by the influence of foreign NGOs claiming to be “grass roots”, but they were funded by corporations and billionaires for the purpose of regime changes and resource redistribution the highest bidder.
U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings
The Entire Western World Lives In Cognitive Dissonance
Let us begin with the family separation issue. The separation of children from immigrant/refugee/asylum parents has caused such public outcry that President Trump has backed off his policy and signed an executive order terminating family separation.
The horror of children locked up in warehouses operated by private businesses making a profit off of US taxpayers, while parents are prosecuted for illegal entry, woke even self-satisfied “exceptional and indispensable” Americans out of their stupor. It is a mystery that the Trump regime chose to discredit its border enforcement policy by separating families. Perhaps the policy was intended to deter illegal immigration by sending the message that if you come to America your children will be taken from you.
The question is: How is it that Americans can see and reject the inhumane border control policy and not see the inhumanity of family destruction that has been the over-riding result of Washington’s destruction in whole or part of seven or eight countries in the 21st century?
Millions of people have been separated from families by death inflicted by Washington, and for almost two decades protests have been almost nonexistent. No public outcry stopped George W. Bush, Obama, and Trump from clear and indisputable illegal acts defined in international law established by the US itself as war crimes against the inhabitants of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia. We can add to this an eighth example: The military attacks by the US armed and supported neo-Nazi puppet state of Ukraine against the breakaway Russian provinces.
School shootings remain uniquely attractive because the media gives shooters a massive platform to air their hateful views.
By Kenny Xu
The Sante Fe High School shooting was a horrific tragedy, but it was also a sadly predictable affair.
A socially isolated white man takes out his rage on his school. The media, appalled, tries to study what went wrong. Some blame guns. Some blame toxic masculinity. All repeat the name of the shooter, over and over again, until his name, and his deranged views, become as embedded in the public consciousness as any celebrity. The public commentariat abides by a cultural script that spins the shootings into one partisan direction or another, allowing the acts of violence to completely dominate our news cycle, across airwaves and headlines. In a sad perverse way, the shooters get exactly what they wanted — attention.
And the cycle of shoot, rinse, repeat, continues.
Over the past 20 years, news media have failed to balance their investigative natures with concerns about legitimizing the views and lifestyles of people whose world views do not deserve to be heard. One of the first articles in The Washington Post to accompany the actual news of the Santa Fe shooting was a lengthy profile of the perpetrator, the headline saying that he had a “fondness for trench coats and a growing darkness.” From Santa Fe, to Parkland, to Charleston, to Aurora and Virginia Tech, the news media can’t help but elevate the platforms of deranged men by publishing their sick, twisted views.
HOW TO SPOT A FALSE FLAG IN A POST REPEAL SMITH-MUNDT ERA
Written by Sebastian Swift entitled “5 Confirmed False Flag Operations And How To Spot Them In The Future.”
“The false flag phenomenon is distinctively modern and used as an ideological weapon to control populations with the fear of a manufactured enemy. They are used in ostensibly democratic systems where people believe they have inalienable rights. Such democratic systems–primarily the United States, Israel, and Great Britain–must shock people into sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as such, require sophisticated modern propaganda systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills.”- Swift
Signs of a False Flag Operation:
- There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience. In his lecture at Contact in the Desert, [author and researcher] Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing characteristic of a false flag operation is that the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the media. There are often legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the wings, which the government can immediately implement.
- The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body. The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for countless civil liberty infringements by the national security state, including ubiquitous domestic surveillance and indefinite detention.
- The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. For example, many of the recent domestic terror attacks, including the Aurora [and Orlando] shooting[s], have exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun control legislation.
- Military training drills and police drills occur on the day of and very near the attack itself, causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. This is no small point. An incredible percentage of major domestic or international terror attacks have involved simultaneous “training drills.” This list includes, but is not limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11, the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and the Boston Marathon. Though none of the aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance to previous false flag attacks and should be looked at with an investigative eye.