Narrative of Human-Caused “Climate Change:” Scientists Co-opted, Corrupted by Politicians and Bureaucracies

Climate Change Global Warming GLobal Cooling
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis

It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists. Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims.

According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.”

The authors of the survey report, however, note that the overwhelming majority of scientists fall within four other models, each of which is skeptical of alarmist global warming claims.

Read More: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/02/13/peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-crisis/

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

Oct. 30, 2015
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed   to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

“We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.”  Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”

Scientists calculate how much the ice sheet is growing or shrinking from the changes in surface height that are measured by the satellite altimeters. In locations where the amount of new snowfall accumulating on an ice sheet is not equal to the ice flow downward and outward to the ocean, the surface height changes and the ice-sheet mass grows or shrinks.

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years — I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

The study analyzed changes in the surface height of the Antarctic ice sheet measured by radar altimeters on two European Space Agency European Remote Sensing (ERS) satellites, spanning from 1992 to 2001, and by the laser altimeter on NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) from 2003 to 2008.

Zwally said that while other scientists have assumed that the gains in elevation seen in East Antarctica are due to recent increases in snow accumulation, his team used meteorological data beginning in 1979 to show that the snowfall in East Antarctica actually decreased by 11 billion tons per year during both the ERS and ICESat periods. They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time.

“At the end of the last Ice Age, the air became warmer and carried more moisture across the continent, doubling the amount of snow dropped on the ice sheet,” Zwally said.

Read More: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

Greenpeace Founder: Global Warming Hoax Pushed by Corrupt Scientists ‘Hooked on Government Grants’

Robert Kraychik  

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the cynical and corrupt machinations fueling the narrative of anthropocentric global warming and “climate change” in a Wednesday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.

Moore explained how fear and guilt are leveraged by proponents of climate change:

Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people’s minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign — well, fear and guilt — you’re afraid you’re killing your children because you’re driving them in your SUV and emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and you feel guilty for doing that. There’s no stronger motivation than those two.

Scientists are co-opted and corrupted by politicians and bureaucracies invested in advancing the narrative of “climate change” in order to further centralize political power and control, explained Moore.

Read More: https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/

The Green New Deal has Red All Over It

Just like the wealth tax that was recently repealed in France. 
Another “Green New Deal” has been sucking the wealth out of Europe since 2008.

Global Warming Marvelous Excuse Supra-National Socialism - Margaret Thatcher

The New Green Deal Is Just Old White Elephants

Daniel Lacalle
A huge stimulus in 2008 in a “growth and employment plan”. A stimulus of 1.5% of GDP to create “millions of jobs in infrastructure, civil works, interconnections, and strategic sectors”. 4.5 million jobs were destroyed and the deficit nearly doubled. That was after the crisis because between 2001 and 2008, money supply in the Eurozone doubled. The Eurozone has been a chain of stimuli since day one.

The so-called “Juncker Plan” or  “Investment Plan for Europe” hailed as the “solution” to the European Union lack of growth was the same. It raised 360 billion euros, many for white elephants.  Eurozone growth estimates were slashed, productivity growth stalled and industrial production fell in December 2018 to three-year low levels.

The Eurozone’s massive “green” policy plan has made the European Union countries suffer electricity and natural gas bills for households that are more than double those of the US, and unemployment is still twice that of the United States, while growth stagnates. In 2016 household electricity prices averaged 26.6 c/kWh in the Euro area and 12.7 c/kWh in the US.

Let us start debunking some myths about this last rabbit out of the interventionists’ hat.

Read More:

The New Green Deal Is Just Old White Elephants

Remember: The Billionaire Climate Change Agenda is for Power and Wealth Redistribution

Time and again, we see how the billionaires pushing for austerity based on climate change are hypocrites who’s predictions have all been false and are based on paid-for politicized science.

Fake News Polar Bears Global Warming Climate Change

Let’s do follow the climate money!

By December 30th, 2018

… climate computer model forecasts are completely out of touch with real-world observations. There is no evidence to support claims that the slight temperature, climate and weather changes we’ve experienced are dangerous, unprecedented or caused by humans, instead of by the powerful solar, oceanic and other natural forces that have driven similar or far more serious changes throughout history.

More importantly, the CCI “solutions” would cause unprecedented disruption of modern industrialized societies; permanent poverty and disease in poor countries; and serious ecological damage worldwide.

Nothing that is required to harness breezes and sunshine to power civilization is clean, green, renewable, climate-friendly or sustainable. Tens of billions of tons of rock would have to be removed, to extract billions of tons of ores, to create millions of tons of metals, concrete and other materials, to manufacture millions of wind turbines and solar panels, and install them on millions of acres of wildlife habitats – to generate expensive, intermittent energy that would be grossly insufficient for humanity’s needs. Every step in this process requires fossil fuels – and some of the mining involves child labor.

How do CCI alarmists respond to these points? They don’t. They refuse to engage in or even permit civil discussion. They rant that anyone “who denies climate change science” is on the fossil fuel industry payroll, thus has a blatant conflict of interest and no credibility, and therefore should be ignored.

Read More: http://www.cfact.org/2018/12/30/lets-do-follow-the-climate-money/?mc_cid=72cbd3e2ac&mc_eid=fc8db34f3b

The Old New Deal Introduced the Fascist American Government The New “Green New Deal” will Seal the Deal

Let’s face the fact that the FDR’s New Deal was nothing but a power and money grab by the government that had nothing to do with recovering from the Great Depression. 

Let’s also fact the fact that the science behind man-made climate change is  weaponized, politicized science that is paid for and promoted by billionaires who run foundations, corporations and control most governments. 

The “New Green Deal” won’t just be paid for by the richest Americans, prices would dramatically go up for all Americans. 

This is just another targeted weapon of mass economic destruction aimed at the middle classes. 

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez it is more important to be morally right than facutally correct

Flaws With a “Green New Deal,” Part 1 of 2

BY ROBERT P. MURPHY

DECEMBER 20, 2018

There’s a growing buzz around a “Green New Deal,” spearheaded by newly-elected Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Although the details are in flux, currently the draft text calls for the creation of a 15-member “Select Committee for a Green New Deal” that would “have authority to develop a detailed national, industrial, economic mobilization plan” to make the U.S. economy “greenhouse gas emissions neutral.” As if that weren’t ambitious enough, the Select Committee’s detailed national plan would also have the goal “to promote economic and environmental justice and equality.” The draft specifically mentions spending $1 trillion over ten years, in addition to extensive taxes and regulations to steer the economy and society as the 15 committee members see fit. (To be clear, the draft text currently calls for the creation of the select committee, which in turn is then tasked with drafting legislation forming the “Green New Deal” itself.)

In this two-part series I will strongly critique both the spirit and substance of a proposed “Green New Deal.” In the second article, I will focus on the specific proposals in the draft legislation. But in this first piece I will give the historical context and explain why the very notion of a Green New Deal is misguided, because it relies on faulty history and bad economics.

Read More: https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/regulation/flaws-with-a-green-new-deal-part-1-of-2/

Man-Made Climate Hoax is a Wealth Redistribution and Tyrannical Control Scheme

Historic Climate Predictions
Historic Climate Predictions

30 Years of Global Warming Forecasts all Failed

Posted Jun 24, 2018 by Martin Armstrong

The Wall Street Journal just published a review of the Global Warming Forecasts for the past 30 years. They have not even come close to the scenarios they put forth back in 1988. On June 23, 1988, the then NASA scientist James E. Hansen who helped to start all this nonsense testified before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. He stated that he expressed had a “high degree of confidence” in “a cause-and-effect relationship between the claimed CO2 induced “greenhouse effect and observed warming.” That is how government characterizes something when they are guessing – “high degree of confidence” which was the same words used to invade Iraq who had weapons of mass destruction. He later came out and said: “Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.” (August 25, 2002). The CIA Director testified before Congress and said: “We said in the estimate with high confidence that Iraq had them.” see Transcript Washington Post). Why does anyone EVER believe those in government? They cannot even forecast GDP accurately when they fudge the numbers.

Read More: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/30-years-of-global-warming-forecasts-all-failed/

New “politically incorrect” climate change book sells out everywhere; “point-by-point take down” of global warming nonsense

 

Global Warming Marvelous Excuse Supra-National Socialism - Margaret Thatcher

Tuesday, April 17, 2018
by: 

(Natural News) Proving once again that the Left’s claims about human-caused “climate change” and “global warming” are anything but universal, a new book disputing their progressive nonsense has shot to number one on bestseller lists while selling out all over the place.

The appropriately named tome, “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change,” by Marc Morano, has rocketed to No. 1 on Amazon’s Climatology, Environmental Science, Nature and Ecology list, and is maintaining a solid ranking among Amazon’s Top 100, having already sold out once. Retail giant Walmart is also selling the book now.

A reported by Climate Depot, a website dedicated to exposing the fraud that is man-caused global and climate change edited by Morano, both Target and Walmart list the book “out of stock” on their websites, as of this writing.

He notes that the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which publishes Climate Depotdoes have copies of Morano’s book, however. 

A description of the book notes:

Less freedom. More regulation. Higher costs. Make no mistake: those are the surefire consequences of the modern global warming campaign waged by political and cultural elites, who have long ago abandoned fact-based science for dramatic fearmongering in order to push increased central planning. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change gives a voice — backed by statistics, real-life stories, and incontrovertible evidence — to the millions of “deplorable” Americans skeptical about the multibillion dollar “climate change” complex, whose claims have time and time again been proven wrong.

Sponsored solution from CWC Labs: This allows you to test almost anything for 20+ heavy metals and nutritive minerals, including lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, aluminum and more. You can test your own hair, vitamins, well water, garden soil, superfoods, pet hair, beverages and other samples (no blood or urine). ISO accredited laboratory using ICP-MS (mass spec) analysis with parts per billion sensitivity. .

The book is winning plaudits from readers and pundits alike. 

Talk host Mark Levin, a former Justice Department official in the Reagan administration and co-founder of CRTV, called Morano a “one-man general” leading the effort against the climate hoaxers.

“Marc Morano and he’s a terrific guy and he has written a brand new book ‘The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change.’ — I can’t possibly in this segment give this book the attention it deserves or give you the attention you deserve. You are like a one-man general fighting this effort and you have a complete comprehension of it. I want to strongly encourage my audience [to read it] — it’s digestible, it’s in plain English,” he said during a recent interview.

Conservative pundit and author Cal Thomas noted, “Read this book and you will become an informed climate change denier, armed with arguments and facts to counter the propaganda being pushed by climate change fanatics.” (Related: UN official actually ADMITS that ‘global warming’ is a scam designed to ‘change world’s economic model.’)

“I took everything Al Gore did in his books and movies and tried to do the exact opposite: use humor, entertainment and fun,” Morano told the Washington Times.

The paper further noted: 

That makes his ideological foes even angrier…The liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America once dubbed him “Misinformer of the Year.” The 2015 documentary “Merchants of Doubt” portrayed him as a mustache-twirling villain. The progressive news/opinion website The Daily Kos slammed him as “evil personified.

In his book Morano essentially refutes the Left-wing climate doom-and-gloomers, noting that no, the sky isn’t falling, and no, there is no hard-and-fast, replicable evidence to ‘prove’ that our SUVs, cattle farts, and technology is sabotaging the planet.

The fact is, despite the claim on the Left that “97 percent of climate scientists agree” with the man-caused premise, it’s simply not true. That statistic is based on a hugely flawed sampling that was given overly broad ‘authority’ after then-President Barack Obama tweeted on May 16, 2013: “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made, and dangerous.”

No one really disputes that the earth has warmed about a degree over the 100 or so years. No one really disputes that our climate is “changing.”

Where the alarmists lose people is when they blame it on just about every facet of life.

See more of the nonsense at Climate.news.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources include:

ClimateDepot.com

WashingtonTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

Read More: https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-17-new-politically-incorrect-climate-change-book-sells-out-everywhere.html

Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice extent

Arctic Sea Ice Levels 2017

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

 Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice extent

Total sea ice extent on the northern hemisphere during the past years, including climate mean; plus/minus 2 standard deviations. The ice extent values are calculated from the ice type data from the Ocean and Sea Ice, Satellite Application Facility (OSISAF), where areas with ice concentration higher than 15% are classified as ice.

The total area of sea ice is the sum of First Year Ice (FYI), Multi Year Ice (MYI) and the area of ambiguous ice types, from the OSISAF ice type product. The total sea ice extent can differ slightly from other sea ice extent estimates. Possible differences between this sea ice extent estimate and others are most likely caused by differences in algorithms and definitions.

Data set

The sea ice extent data from 1979 till today is composed by a Climate Data Record (CDR, OSI-409a), an Interim CDR providing updates with one month delay to the CDR (ICDR, OSI-430) and an operational setup that calculates sea ice extent for the period between the ICDR and today.

You can read technical and validation reports of the products here.

Read More: ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php

Climate change computer models totally “wrong” … new science finds models wildly over-projecting rises in global temperature – NaturalNews.com

Tyson Chicken Science

(Natural News) Belief in the concept of catastrophic man-made global warming is now virtually demanded of everyone who wants to be taken seriously and perceived to be a thinking, educated person. Scientists, the mainstream media and public figures like Al Gore have been ramming the concept down our throats for years now, but independent media leaders like Mike Adams, the founder and editor of Natural News, have steadfastly insisted that the data has been manipulated to make the situation appear more dire than it is and to take control of global industry.

Well, after all the jeering from the sidelines, they’ve been proved right; a landmark paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience has finally admitted that the alarmists had it wrong all along.

The Telegraph recently reported:

Climate change poses less of an immediate threat to the planet than previously thought because scientists got their modelling wrong, a new study has found. New research by British scientists reveals the world is being polluted and warming up less quickly than 10-year-old forecasts predicted, giving countries more time to get a grip on their carbon output. [Emphasis added]

Notice how the article just skips right over the fact that the modeling has been wrong, and uses it as an opportunity to reinforce the concept that countries need to “get a grip on their carbon output.”

The Paris Climate Agreement, which President Trump famously recently bowed out of, is all about keeping global temperatures within 1.5° of where they were before the “evil” manufacturing industry starting spewing carbon dioxide into the air with the birth of the industrial revolution.

Reaching this goal has largely been touted as a virtually impossible feat, only to be accomplished if the whole world pulls together and emissions can be reduced to zero.

Each year, for at least the past decade, headlines have screamed, “Hottest year on record!” making it seem that temperatures are increasing by multiple degrees every year.

Well, that just flat-out isn’t true. (Related: Find out what’s really going on with climate change at ClimateScienceNews.com)

The latest report – which was compiled by scientists who are absolute believers in the global warming theory, and are actually directly involved in determining the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) carbon budget – clearly indicates that temperatures have only risen by between 0.9° and 1.0° since the start of the Industrial Revolution in England.

So, not only has the temperature not been climbing by a couple of degrees every year for the past decade, but it’s only increased by a degree or less since industries supposedly began changing the climate forever.

While The Telegraph deceptively refers to this time as the “mid-19th-Century,” they actually need to go back a few years.

The History channel notes:

Prior to the Industrial Revolution, which began in Britain in the late 1700s, manufacturing was often done in people’s homes, using hand tools or basic machines. Industrialization marked a shift to powered, special-purpose machinery, factories and mass production. [Emphasis added]

So, the global temperature has increased by 1° in the last 220 years or so – and that’s if you believe that the scientists have now got the modeling right.  (Related: Climate change science implodes as IPCC climate models found to be “totally wrong” … temperatures aren’t rising as predicted … hoax unraveling.)

For those who have been bravely swimming upstream for years and trying to let people know that the whole global warming theory is based on shaky – and possibly fraudulent – science, none of this comes as a surprise.

For those who have faithfully believed everything the media, politicians and others with a vested interest in pushing the global warming theory have told them, this will no doubt come as a shock.

It just reinforces once more that only the independent media can be relied upon to report unbiased scientific fact.

 

FROM: www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-24-priority-climate-change-computer-models-totally-wrong-new-science-finds-models-wildly-over-projecting-rises-in-temperature.html

What Is The Average Global Temperature?

The average global temperature is…impossible to measure and harder to calculate than you might think. While GISS and RSS and UAH and GHCN might be a confusing jumble of letters to most people, there are people pushing for global taxes, global courts and individual carbon budgets based on these data sets. So let’s roll up our sleeves and take a look at the concept of “average global temperature.”

SHOW NOTES
The Elusive Absolute Surface Air Temperature

Q&A – An Audience With David Suzuki

Jail politicians who ignore climate science: Suzuki

Climate4you.com

Temperature anomaly relative to 30 year mean for different datasets

RSS Continues To Diverge From GISS

The robust Pause resists a robust el Niño Still no global warming at all for 18 years 9 months

GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) – Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Percentage of Reporting GSCN Stations that are USHCN

Data Tampering At USHCN/GISS

Uncertainty in the Global Average Surface Air Temperature Index: A Representative Lower Limit