How Governments Ruined Healthcare and Why Single Payer is Based on Falsehoods

Wait Times in Canadian Healthcare

The Myth They Used to Pass Canada’s Universal Healthcare

  04/06/2018

A History Lesson

During the 19th and early 20th centuries, health care was offered in various ways, including through voluntary mutual-aid associations in Britain, Australia, and the United States. Roderick Long wrote about these fraternal societies, where members could subscribe to various services, including life insurance, disability insurance, and lodge practice. Lodge practice was an arrangement whereby a particular society or lodge would contract with a doctor to provide medical care to its members.

The doctor received a regular salary on a retainer basis, rather than charging per item; members would pay a yearly fee and then call on the doctor’s services as needed. If medical services were found unsatisfactory, the doctor would be penalized, and the contract might not be renewed. Lodge members reportedly enjoyed the degree of customer control this system afforded them. And the tendency to overuse the physician’s services was kept in check by the fraternal society’s own “self-policing”; lodge members who wanted to avoid future increases in premiums were motivated to make sure that their fellow members were not abusing the system.

The average cost of lodge practice for each member was between one and two dollars (a day’s wage) annually, whereas non-members paid the same price for each visit to the doctor. Doctors competed for lodge contracts, which kept costs low. The Canadian experience with lodge practice was similar, and, as in America and Britain, this infuriated the medical establishment.

The Medical Establishment

Most people (including rank and file doctors in the 19th century) are content to pursue their goals through voluntary interactions with others, and do not claim the right to tell others what they can and cannot do. However, there is always a minority who detest voluntary exchange on the free market, preferring to outlaw this activity by using government legislation to enrich themselves by dictating the terms of trade. This describes the medical establishment in the 19th century (and today). In Canadian Medicine, A Study In Restricted Entry (pp 195, 197), Ronald Hamowy wrote:

By the 1890s, lodge practice had reached sufficient proportions to become a common subject of condemnation in the medical journals. Of particular concern was the “cut-rate” fees for services charged by lodge practitioners, with a concomitant reduction in demand for full-priced medical services.

. . . the Canada Lancet, in commenting on the subject in 1905, noted: Just think for a moment how absurd it appears that a doctor should agree to attend a lodge of 200 men for $1.25 per year and supply the medicine! We do not hesitate to say that he would be better off by declining the $250 and take what he can get in the ordinary way.

What the Canada Lancet was really saying was “How absurd it is that a doctor should have the freedom to voluntarily negotiate fees with the riff raff. We do not hesitate to say that his selfish actions are preventing the superior medical establishment from raising their own incomes by dictating fees to the general public.”

The medical establishment wanted to raise their incomes by restricting the number of doctors (in part, by imposing irrelevant licensing criteria), but the public was not easily fooled. Hamowy (p 125) wrote:

Despite the actions of the College to suppress unregistered physicians, the public continued to firmly oppose prosecution of these practitioners throughout the nineteenth century. Nor did they believe the College and the medical journals when they insisted that their campaign against “quacks” was designed to separate out educated from unqualified physicians.

. . . many, especially poorer, Canadians persisted in consulting unlicensed physicians, whose fees were lower and who appeared no less competent in prescribing medications than did their registered brethren. The profession’s attempt to suppress these doctors was not motivated out of a selfless interest in improving the quality of medical care offered the public, but out of a desire to lessen competition, which would in turn increase their incomes.

Sadly, the medical establishment got its wish, as Hamowy (pp 129, 237) explains:

As early as 1869, one of the Council’s [Ontario Medical Council] representatives had remarked, to the delight of its other members, that “it would be a great boon to the country if not another student passed for ten years to come.”

. . . by the first decade of the twentieth century physicians throughout the Dominion had succeeded in gaining enactment of laws in each of the provinces limiting entry into the profession . . .

After many years of lobbying, the government gifted the medical establishment with legislation granting them monopoly powers over their industry, including licensing, under the pretense that only qualified physicians should be allowed to serve the public. (Government regulations always serve the interests of those who lobbied for the regulations.)

The medical establishment was highly incentivized to lobby and bribe politicians because the average monetary gain for each member of the establishment would be huge, compared to the average loss suffered by each member of the public. This dispersal of costs over a large number of citizens meant that they lacked an incentive to mount an effective opposition. Thus, the establishment gained at the expense of the public. That’s democracy!

Read More: https://mises.org/wire/myth-they-used-pass-canadas-universal-healthcare

Someone Wants You Dead and Doesn’t Mind if You do the Job for Them

antidepressant vs murder

The Big Secret The Mainstream Media Doesn’t Want To Tell You About America’s Soaring Suicide Rates

Michael Snyder 

On average, 123 Americans commit suicide every single day, and now suicide has become the 10th leading cause of death in the United States.

But among Americans between the ages of 10 and 34, it is now the second leading cause of death.

Of course it wasn’t always this way.  Suicide rates used to be much, much lower.  If you can believe it, suicide rates in the United States “have risen nearly 30 percent since 1999” according to the CDC…

….

So why is this happening?

History tells us that suicide rates tend to go up during economic recessions, but we are not in a recession at the moment.

According to NBC News, researchers have found that people that kill themselves tend to have certain things in common…

  • 42 percent had a relationship problem
  • 28 percent had substance abuse issues
  • 16 percent had job or financial problems
  • 29 percent had some kind of crisis
  • 22 percent had a physical health issue
  • 9 percent had a criminal legal problem

But those problems have always existed in our society.

To find the truth, we need to go down a rabbit hole, and it is a rabbit hole that the mainstream media doesn’t want to talk about.

The use of antidepressants and other mind-altering drugs is absolutely exploding in our society.  According to Time Magazine, the use of antidepressants rose almost 65 percent between 1999 and 2014…

Read More: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-big-secret-the-mainstream-media-doesnt-want-to-tell-you-about-americas-soaring-suicide-rates

For Profit Crisis: The Opioid Epidemic Is By Design

Opioid Epidemic in America
Opioid Epidemic in America

How Medicaid Funds and Fuels the Opioid Epidemic | The Daily Bell

By The Daily Bell Staff
February 17, 2018
The Senate report is entitled: Drugs for Dollars: How Medicaid Helps Fuel the Opioid Epidemic. The Majority Staff of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs released the report on January 17 of this year.

The information adds to the evidence of corruption in the distribution of opioid painkillers as well as opioids prescribed to combat addiction.

Far from helping in recovery, government funds are used by criminals to profit from and exacerbate the epidemic.

Read More: www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/how-medicaid-funds-and-fuels-the-opioid-epidemic/

Revolving Door Between CDC and Drugs Manufacturers Reveals Vaccine Dangers Cover-up

Do You Know What's in Your Vaccine?

Time To Expose MD Julie Gerberding, Former CDC Director, For Her Role In CDC’s Vaccine Fraud

Dr. Julie Gerberding, MD, was CDC’s Director [1] until she resigned and then ‘advanced’ on to the job of , proving the “revolving door culture” that exists between Big Pharma and federal health agencies, especially FDA and the CDC.

CDC epidemiologist and whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, tells how he went to Dr. Gerberding telling her what was going on with the study finding autism implications in young black boys less than three years of age.

Dr. Thompson was the lead researcher on that project.  Therefore, he was supposed to deliver the findings at a conference.  He was pulled from the project; it was given to Dr. Frank DeStefano, who delivered the results at the conference, while the rest of the story is divulged in the documentary VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.

Read More: https://www.activistpost.com/2018/04/time-to-expose-md-julie-gerberding-former-cdc-director-for-her-role-in-cdcs-vaccine-fraud.html

References:

[1] http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2002/07/julie-gerberding-named-director-cdc

Resources:

The Mary and Sallie Blog Talk Radio Show About Protesting Dr. Gerberding’s Award
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow/2018/03/30/worship-of-the-unethical-protest-53-nyc-heather-turano-dr-brian-hooker

Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”
https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/former-cdc-director-that-approved-gardasil-vaccine-and-became-head-of-mercks-vaccine-division-named-woman-of-the-year/

A Matter of Right and Wrong: the CDC’s Troubling Lack of Research Ethics 
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-matter-of-right-and-wrong-the-cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process(2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available.

Who’re the Real Mass Murderers in America?

Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder

antidepressant vs murder

Major pharmaceutical companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars covering up lawsuits over suicides and mass murders caused by popular antidepressants.

Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.

While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI’s have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:

Read More: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/big-pharma-has-spent-millions-covering-up-suicides-and-mass-murder-caused-by-antidepressants/

Another Alternative Doctor is Dead Under Suspicious Circumstances

Health Care

This has been going on for a while now. 

We should always question when people are said to have taken their own life or died in unusual or untimely ways because it’s been seen that our own government has used many methods to covertly assassinate people.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/…/cia-assassination-methods/
https://www.counterpunch.org/…/19/the-cias-secret-killers/
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php…
https://www.theguardian.com/…/cia-long-history-kill…

Many of the cases we know about are from decades ago, so their technology and methods have definitely improved beyond what we can imagine.

Reporter Michael Hastings is considered by the alt media community as having been assassinated by remote controlled car crash…
https://en.wikipedia.org/…/Michael_Hastings_(journalist…

We know that Snopes is shit… but this Snopes debunk, if you read it to the end, goes to show just how many doctor’s deaths have been suspicious if you take into consideration many of our own government’s methods, including MKUltra-like mind control. https://www.snopes.com/…/holistic-doctor-death-conspiracy/

What’s the reason they would do this?

The medical-industrial complex is a part of the banks and corporations that control our government, and the intelligence agencies act as their covert enforcement arm… (Like how we set up coups in Central and South America to turn countries into “banana republics” to be controlled by Dannon etc etc etc..there’s a long history of this.)

We know that supposed “cures” for cancer like chemotherapy were developed by big pharma to find a uses for an access supply of Mustard Gas… so they aren’t really cures. http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/…/mustard-gas…/

Now that there’s a lot of alternative cures for cancer it only makes sense that these industries are trying to keep any of them from going mainstream. Natural cures like CBD oil or whatever, can’t be patented and profited from the way synthetic pharmaceuticals can be.

Holistic doctor dead of alleged suicide (#85)

Holistic Dr. Mark Flanagan, age 62 of Seguin, died on February 23, 2018. He allegedly hanged himself.

He was described as fit, healthy and fun loving by his friends who- understandably- appear to be in shock.

One mutual friend, a medical doctor whose name will not be shared, said Mark would not do this. It’s just not how Mark would have behaved.

We are thinking of Dr. Flanagan’s family and friends during this difficult time and will add an update as more information becomes available. Currently, all we know is what the published obituary stated: his date of death and that a full obituary will be coming out next week.

Many of the doctor’s friends and loved ones have been sharing their stories and grief on his personal Facebook page.

He is 85 in our unintended holistic doctor series.

Again, we’ll update this as soon as we know more.

Erin Elizabeth HNN, East Coast of Florida

Read More: https://www.healthnutnews.com/holistic-doctor-dead-of-alleged-suicide-85/

Medical tyranny: Woman who rejected breast cancer diagnosis may still be forced undergo surgery without her consent

Zoidberg Says To Trust Him

When a doctor suggests an operation that you don’t feel is necessary, you have the right to decide not to move forward with it – right? If you happen to have any sort of mental illness, it’s something that doctors could use to say you’re not in your right mind to make such decisions and then go ahead and do as they please regardless of your opinion.

That is what is happening right now in the U.K., as a 66-year-old woman who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia is set to be placed under general anesthesia and have breast cancer surgery against her will. A High Court judge has granted the University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust an order that is said to be in the woman’s best interest to remove a tumor in her left breast.

The woman, who has only been identified as “JT,” denies that she has cancer. She believes the tumor is merely a cyst and does not see the need for surgery. The judge said her mental illness means she does not have the capacity to decide on her own whether or not to undergo treatment.

After hearing arguments from lawyers representing both the woman and her doctors, the judge wrote in his decision that he was satisfied that she did indeed have breast cancer and that the proposed surgery was the right course of action.

Medical treatment could be what caused the cancer in the first place

It’s interesting to note that schizophrenia is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, and some studies pin the blame on the antipsychotics given to such patients. A study released earlier this year showed that women who have schizophrenia have double the risk of breast cancer compared to those without the illness.

In particular, those women who were undergoing a combination therapy of both first-generation and second-generation antipsychotics had a significantly higher risk of breast cancer. The drugs linked to higher risk include risperidone, amisulpride and paliperidone.

Experts report that it is not unusual for schizophrenics to deny that they have cancer. A delay in diagnosis is common, and many do not follow through on recommended surgery. Some patients have even been known to attack their caregivers, according to a study in the American Journal of Surgery.

Consent to treatment

The official website of the NHS says that if people who have the capacity to make informed decisions choose to reject a treatment, their decision has to be respected even if it could cause them to die. However, it’s very different for those who are deemed to be incapable of making their own decisions.

The site reads:

If a person doesn’t have the capacity to make a decision about their treatment, the healthcare professionals treating them can go ahead and give treatment if they believe it’s in the person’s best interests. But clinicians must take reasonable steps to seek advice from the patient’s friends or relatives before making these decisions.

It’s not the first time something like this has happened in the U.K. A 55-year-old woman with learning difficulties was forced to undergo surgery for advanced uterine cancer. She had originally agreed to the operation, but later changed her mind and stopped showing up to medical appointments. She said she had a phobia of needles and hospitals.

Learning disabilities were somehow enough to have her deemed incapable of making rational decisions about her healthcare, and she was forced to undergo a hysterectomy and have her ovaries and Fallopian tubes removed. Doctors said that they would sedate her and bring her to the operating room, and then turn to “reasonable force and/or sedation to prevent [her] leaving hospital.”

In other words, if you don’t want to get a treatment your doctors want you to have for whatever reason, they could have you declared mentally unfit and do it anyway.

Sources include:

BMJ.com

Metro.co.uk

Medscape.com

NHS.uk

Telegraph.co.uk

Read More: https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-18-medical-tyranny-woman-who-rejected-breast-cancer-diagnosis-may-be-forced-to-undergo-surgery.html

PayPal Founder’s Vaccine Co. Caught Injecting Public with Herpes Without Consent Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/news/3236-paypal-founder-s-vaccine-co-caught-injecting-public-with-herpes-without-consent © Neon Nettle

Mr Burns on oncology spending.

Billionaire Peter Thiel’s drug company illegally testing virus on unsuspecting victims

A vaccine company, funded by billionaire PayPal founder Peter Thiel, has been caught injected the herpes virus into people, without their consent, in a hotel.

An investigation revealed that a US researcher carried out illegal testing of the herpes vaccine on unsuspecting guests at a Holiday Inn and at a house on the island of St. Kitts.

A former associate professor at Southern Illinois University (SIU), William Halford, carried out the illegal “trials” at the Holiday Inn Express and a Crowne Plaza Hotel located 15 minutes away from the campus.

Halford, who died of cancer in June, conducted the testing on behalf of his pharmaceuticals company Rational Vaccines, which is co-owned by Thiel and Hollywood filmmaker Agustín Fernández III.

On four separate occasions in the summer and fall of 2013, Halford administered his experimental shots to at least eight patients, without gaining their written consent and without them knowing what he was injecting them with.

According to emails from seven participants and interviews with one participant, the victims were injected with a virus the company had created in the lab.

This isn’t the first time the billionaire founder of PayPal Peter Thiel has been connected to controversy, as earlier this year, he admitted to drinking the blood of children in a bid to extend his own lifespan. During an interview with Inc.com’s Jeff Bercovici, Thiel admitted that he harvests young blood from teenagers to drink and infuse himself with, in a practice known as parabiosis, which he claims is the closest modern science has come to creating an anti-aging panacea.

Thiel invested millions in Rational Vaccines in a bid to take on Bill Gates who has cornered the lucrative vaccinations market.

These revelations of reckless testing were described by Halford as a “milestone in my career,” after the unknowing patients reported severe symptoms from the jabs, according to an investigation by Kaiser Health News.

RT reports: In multiple email exchanges between Halford and the participants, seen by Kaiser, he asked them to send photographs of rashes, blisters and other reactions they might have received as a result of the injections.

Halford, who was a microbiologist rather than a physician, apparently knew that his makeshift trial was a violation of US law, as he stated the need for secrecy in one of his emails. He said it would be “suicide” if it became too public about how he was conducting his research.

He described his methods in some of his emails, as well as the number of injections given.

“Just wanted to pass along that I immunized someone with the higher dose of the HSV-2 vaccine on Monday, and I attach the photos of the injection site at 48 hours to give you and everyone else an idea of what to expect…,” he wrote in September 2013. “This individual requested that I give him two immunizations to double the effect…one immunization per leg.”

Four days later, Halford wrote that “everyone’s vaccines contained ~150 million infectious units of the HSV-2 vaccine strain,” noting that the first injection of the group represented about a 30- to 40-fold increase over what others received in August 2013.

In the same email, the microbiologist wrote that he believed the trials were important. “Saturday Sept. 21 definitely represents a milestone in my career,” he wrote. “Don’t know how it will turn out, but I undoubtedly feel like this was a real test of the (a) safety / tolerability of the HSV-2 vaccine and (b) an opportunity to see if it has any therapeutic potential…I am indebted to all of you.”

In an email dated October 2, 2013, Halford told a participant that his hypothesis of the injection’s outcome was “nothing more than an education guess.” He added that “the proof is in the pudding…let’s see if your problems with outbreaks dial back or not.”

In addition to the trial being blatantly illegal, the microbiologist also did not obtain written informed consent from the participants, which is required by US law when testing a live virus on humans. Moreover, medical researchers are not allowed to inject people without a physician or nurse practitioner present, Jonathan Zenilman, a doctor, an expert on sexually transmitted diseases at Johns Hopkins University, told Kaiser….

http://www.neonnettle.com/news/3236-paypal-founder-s-vaccine-co-caught-injecting-public-with-herpes-without-consent

Ex-DEA Agent Blames Congress And Drug Industry For Opioid Crisis

Air America

Whistleblower Joe Rannazzisi is telling all when it comes to placing blame for the nation’s opioid crisis. He says drug distributors pumped opioids into communities in the United States knowing that people were dying and that the US government is helping.

Joe Rannazzisi is a tough and blunt former DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) deputy assistant administrator with a law degree, a pharmacy degree, and a growing rage at the unrelenting death toll from opioids. Congress has often been complicit in atrocities, especially when a politician profits off of the removal of the rights of others. So it should not come as a surprise that Rannazzisi is blaming Congress and the drug industry for the opioid epidemic gripping the nation.

Rannazzisi ran the DEA’s Office of Diversion Control, the division that regulates and investigates the pharmaceutical industry. Now in a joint investigation by 60 Minutesand The Washington Post, Rannazzisi tells the inside story of how, he says, the opioid crisis was allowed to spread. Its quick spread was also aided by Congress, lobbyists, and a drug distribution industry that shipped, almost unchecked, hundreds of millions of pills to rogue pharmacies and pain clinics providing the rocket fuel for a crisis that, over the last two decades, has claimed 200,000 lives.

The DEA responded to the explosive report that the government is helping keep Americans addicted to opioids so that pharmaceutical companies can continue to boast big profits. The DEA says it has taken actions against far fewer opioid distributors under a new law. A Justice Department memo shows 65 doctors, pharmacies, and drug companies received suspension orders in 2011. Only six of them have gotten them this year. “During the past seven years, we have removed approximately 900 registrations annually, preventing reckless doctors and rogue businesses from making an already troubling problem worse,” the DEA said in a written statement. “Increasingly, our investigators initiated more than 10,000 cases and averaged more than 2,000 arrests per year.”

But Rannazzisi says this is an industry that is out of control and the DEA isn’t making a dent in this crisis. “What they [big pharma] wanna do, is do what they wanna do, and not worry about what the law is. And if they don’t follow the law in drug supply, people die. That’s just it. People die.” The harsh reality is that the burgeoning issue of the opioid epidemic is lining the pockets of the pharmaceutical industry and the politicians who help fuel it, so there’s no real rush to stem the bleeding of this crisis.

“This is an industry that allowed millions and millions of drugs to go into bad pharmacies and doctors’ offices, that distributed them out to people who had no legitimate need for those drugs,” Rannazzisi said.

Most of his anger is reserved for the distributors of opioid drugs. Some of them are actually multibillion-dollar, Fortune 500 companies. They are the middlemen that ship the pain pills from manufacturers, like Purdue Pharma and Johnson & Johnson to drug stores all over the country. Rannazzisi accuses the distributors of fueling the opioid epidemic by turning a blind eye to pain pills being diverted to illicit use.

“This is an industry that allowed millions and millions of drugs to go into bad pharmacies and doctors’ offices, that distributed them out to people who had no legitimate need for those drugs,” Rannazzisi said. “The three largest distributors are Cardinal HealthMcKesson, and AmerisourceBergen. They control probably 85 or 90 percent of the drugs going downstream,” he added when prompted. Rannazzisi said it’s a “fact” that the big pharmaceutical companies knew they were pumping drugs into people unnecessarily for profits and that people were dying.

In the late 1990s, opioids like oxycodone and hydrocodone became a routine medical treatment for chronic pain. Drug companies assured doctors and congressional investigators that the pain medications were effective and safe. With many doctors convinced the drugs posed few risks, prescriptions skyrocketed and so did addiction.

Big pharma had a plan. It was solely a business plan. Their plan was to sell a lotta pills and make a lot of money. And they did both of those very well.

Read More: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ex-dea-agent-blames-congress-and-drug-industry-for-opioid-crisis_10162017

Doctors know best. (Or, Shut Up and Take Your Shots)

Zoidberg Says To Trust Him

To my friends in Australia: the vaccine war deepens

by Jon Rappoport
Posted on September 24, 2017

The string of abuses laid on citizens of Australia by their government grows almost week by week.

Now, parental rights to raise children, without interference from the State, is under a new form of attack. This must be resisted.

Schools are bringing doctors on board, as a permanent feature. Young children will be subjected to medical diagnoses and treatment, without consent or approval from parents, even if those parents actively object. The State is stealing the role of guardian.

The Herald Sun reports. Read carefully:

“DOCTORS will have the power to treat students as young as 12 in schools even if parents refuse their consent.”

“GPs will consult at 100 Victoria high schools for up to one day a week as part of a $43.8 million program.”

“Guidelines released on Thursday show that even if a parent ‘expressly states’ that a doctor should not [examine] their child, the GP can if they deem the teen mature enough.”

“’Any student who wants to see the GP will be permitted to make an appointment,’ the policy said.”

“The GP will decide if the young person is mature enough to provide consent to any medical treatment for the prevailing issue.”

A young child “giving consent?” This is supposed to be “informed consent” when facing off with an adult doctor?

The handwriting is on the wall. Multiple vaccines will be given, to “bring children up to State standards.” This whole operation is, in fact, a front for forced vaccination. That’s the goal.

But it doesn’t stop there. The covert plan will eventually, if not sooner, include psychiatric diagnoses of so-called “mental disorders.” ADHD, clinical depression, bipolar, and so on. Followed by toxic drugs. Ritalin, Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, Lithium. It’s a parade of toxicity.

I have demonstrated, over and over, that NONE of these so-called mental disorders are based on diagnostic lab tests. They’re pseudoscience.

I would be quite willing to show this and debate this with any Australian doctor or bureaucrat. Head to head, live on Skype.

Is that a challenge? You bet.

The whole medical takeover of parental roles in Australia is on the move. This is naked State force. Nothing less.

“Doctors in schools” is a wedge, a first step in the door, a first boot on the face.

The propaganda is: “We doctors know best. We have the science. Parents are ignorant. We must protect the children. Public safety overrides parents raising their own children and making the important decisions.”

Get it? See the picture? The State is ripping away the natural right of parents to raise their own children.

It’s called a Medical Police State.

If you, as a parent, had some random doctor enter your house and demand to vaccinate, diagnose, and drug your children—and IF that doctor weren’t backed up by the State with all its coercive powers—if he were just a lone individual claiming he could do whatever he wanted to, to your children, you would throw him out without a moment’s hesitation.

Therefore, what we’re looking at here is force, that’s all. Not science, not freedom, not rights. Force. That’s the bottom line.

If some lone doctor, without force behind him, walked into your house and said he was going to inject your children with a neurotoxin called aluminum, and a toxin called formaldehyde, and a toxin called Polysorbate 80, and several germs—all standard components of vaccines—you would halt the proceeding immediately and investigate this ominous situation. You’d be crazy not to.

Where does all this stop?

I’ll tell you where. Nowhere. It doesn’t stop. Doctors, acting as agents for the State, are going to sink their hands into your lives deeper and deeper. Give an inch, they take a mile.

This is a war against you, your children, your family, and all families. This is what unchecked government does.

It says it cares, and then it wreaks destruction.

Do not let the long, long night descend.


Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealedclick here.)

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

FROM: http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/09/24/to-my-friends-in-australia-the-vaccine-war-deepens/