The Industrial Medical Complex: Spreading Disease for Profit and Suppressing Cures with Murder?

Drugs for Profit Never a Cure

Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes in Vaccines all Found Murdered

RORY HALL  

Nagalese prevents vitamin D being produced In the body

Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans.
Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defence to naturally kill cancer cells.
According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!!

This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!!…

Read More: https://freedomoutpost.com/doctors-who-discovered-cancer-enzymes-in-vaccines-all-found-murdered/

Doctors murdered after discovering cancer enzymes in vaccines

by: Samantha Debbie  FEBRUARY 19, 2016

A wave of mysterious deaths continues to plague practitioners in the field of holistic medicine, including chiropractors, herbalists and other alternative healers. Some of the deaths have been tied to research involving nagalase, an enzyme/protein made by cancer cells and viruses that cause immunodeficiency syndromes and autism.

Renowned autism specialist, Dr. James Jeffrey Bradstreet, was researching the enzyme prior to his death in July 2015. His body was discovered floating in a North Carolina river with a single gunshot wound to the chest.

Suspicions swirled that the doctor may have been killed as a result of his controversial research. Bradstreet and his colleagues had discovered that the immune system is being compromised by nagalase, which they suspected was being introduced through vaccines.

Read More: https://thedailycoin.org/2016/09/19/doctors-murdered-after-discovering-cancer-enzymes-in-vaccines/

When Considering the Details, Why Not Question Vaccines?

What makes a poison-filled, profit-driven, no-fault, untested, mandatory, medical procedure questionable?

Do You Know What's in Your Vaccine?

Australia Issues Rolling Fines to Parents Who Won’t Vaccinate Their Children

Australia’s “No Jab, No Pay” policy just got a little stronger, or at least more insistent. Under the previous policy, parents who did not keep their children up to date on vaccinations would miss out on a one-time, end-of-the-year tax benefit called Family Tax Benefit Part A, valued at AU$737. Under the updated policy, those same parents will instead lose AU$28 every two weeks while their child is not up to date.

Australia’s Minister for Social Services, Dan Tehan, said in a statement:

Immunization is the safest way to protect children from vaccine-preventable diseases. Parents who don’t immunize their children are putting their own kids at risk as well as the children of other people.”

The expanded No Jab, No Pay policy went into effect on July 1, 2018.

While parents will miss out on approximately the same amount of money in the end, the updated policy serves as a more “constant reminder” that the government of Australia wants all children vaccinated, according to Tehan.

The Australian government has been attempting to quell the anti-vaccine movement for years and first introduced the No Jab, No Pay campaign in 2016. Since then, nearly 246,000 families have taken steps to meet the requirements.

Concerns arose after small outbreaks of diseases like measles and whooping cough were blamed on an increase in the percentage of children younger than seven claiming a “conscientious objection” to vaccination. Between December 1999 and December 2014, the proportion of children under seven with a “conscientious objection” rose from 0.23 to 1.77 percent.

Read More: https://www.mintpressnews.com/australia-fines-parents-vaccines/245584/

Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate

Canadian problem’ an example of odd effects of prior vaccination

Vaccine Injury Risks Include Contracting the Diseases in the Vaccine

Also, Injecting formaldehyde into infant’s brains is just fine! [sarc]

I trust the medical industrial complex to take the best care of me, not for-profit, but for good… that’s why they lobbied congress to make it impossible to be sued for side effects and there has never been any efficacy or safety testing… [sarc] [sarc]

My Kid was Vaccinated and is fine... vaccine brain injury symptoms go beyond autistic spectrum disorder

Baby dies from “meningitis” 2 days after vaccinations. Was it vaccine-induced?

 July 12, 2018

A sweet child died. Our hearts ache for his parents and beat furiously against the media spin. This child received four month vaccinations two days prior to his death. It is so easy to blame this on some anonymous, alleged villain running around spreading meningitis into the air. The media is gleefully using this story to sell vaccines, to elicit fear, and point the finger at the unvaccinated, that is just robbing people of the truth.

Here’s the story in summary:

  • Healthy 4 month old child is taken to the doctor for well-baby visit.
  • Baby receives vaccines to protect against meningitis, pertussis, tetanus, etc.
  • Two days after receiving vaccines, baby dies of meningitis.
  • Meningitis is listed on vaccine inserts as an adverse event reported to occur after vaccination.
  • Medical professionals recommend vaccinating to prevent meningitis and blame the unvaccinated for the death of the child.

———————————–

“…just two days after Killy had received his 4-month-old vaccinations, Dempsey and her fiancé Gabriel Schultz were informed that their baby had most likely contracted meningitis, an inflammation of the protective membranes that cover the brain and spinal cord.”

———————————–

The CDC recommended vaccines the vaccine inserts for each of these can be found: http://www.immunize.org/fda/

The following information/package inserts list meningitis as an adverse event which has been reported after receiving the Pentacel and Pedarix vaccines. When your child is given vaccines at 4 months of age, your pediatrician will typically give one of these (in addition to other vaccines).

Pentacel [DTaP, Hib, Polio]:
https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/image.cfm?doc_id=13799&image_type=product_pdf

Pediarix [DTaP, Hep B, Polio]:
https://www.gsksource.com/pharma/content/dam/GlaxoSmithKline/US/en/Prescribing_Information/Pediarix/pdf/PEDIARIX.PDF

How the US Government Created the Healthcare Cost Inflation We Have Today

Burns on Health Care

An economic history of the American health care system-Part 1

From the pre-Flexner era to the great depression

Michel Accad, 5/29/2016

Q: What is the starting point in the history of the American health care system?

A:  The American health care system was born in the 1910’s out of the so-called “Flexnerian reform” in medical education and the resulting licensing laws.

Q: Why is that the starting point?

A: Prior to that time, medical care in the United States was essentially unregulated.  Anyone could open up a medical practice, and many did so with little training.

Patients had complete freedom to obtain medical care from whomever they wished.  When such complete freedom exists, one cannot realistically talk about a “system.”

Q: What were the main features of this “pre-historical” period?

A: There were competing forms of medical care.  “Regular” medicine continued the tradition emanating from European institutions and medical schools.  It was ostensibly represented by the American Medical Association (AMA).

The regular form of medical care tended to be more disposed toward aggressive interventions (blistering, bloodtletting , and toxic purgatives), but over time, it also increasingly incorporated scientific knowledge into its mode of practice.   Surgery was part of regular medicine, and surgical techniques were improving rapidly in the latter part of the nineteenth century.

Other forms of medical care, such as Eclecticism, herbalism, and homeopathy tended to be less inclined toward aggressive treatments, and each had its own diagnostic and therapeutic philosophy.

There was a multitude of medical schools, and most of them were privately owned.  In many cases, the curriculum lasted one or two years after high school.  Given this large number of schools, the United States had the highest number of physicians per capita in the world.

Q: It seems like a very chaotic situation.  Were patients confused?

A: It is hard to objectively gauge how the population felt about its medical care at the time, but we can document that over the last decades of the nineteenth century, people seemed to favor medical care which embraced scientific discoveries such as the germ theory of disease.

The number of proprietary schools  declined, and those that survived did so by improving their standards.  Hospitals and institutions which offered more scientific care flourished.  An instructive example of how ordinary people were able to distinguish and reward high quality care is that of the early years of the Mayo clinic.

Q: Who was Flexner and what did he accomplish?

A: Abraham Flexner was an important figure in educational activism who was hired by the Carnegie Foundation to study the state of medical education in the United States.  He had previously issued a report critical of higher education in colleges and universities.

Flexner and leaders at the Carnegie Foundation were impressed with recent scientific and technological advances and wished to promote a philosophy of “scientific management” of human and social affairs, a philosophy that characterizes the progressive era.  At the behest of the AMA’s Council on Education, the Carnegie Foundation decided to fund a survey of medical education and hired Flexner for the task.

Flexner spent two years visiting medical schools throughout the continent and published his influential report on Medical Education in the United States and Canada in 1910.  After publication of the report, Flexner continued to be actively engaged in promoting the report’s recommendations.

Q: What did Flexner find and what did the Flexner report call for? 

A: The report is described as “muckraking” by Kenneth Ludmerer, a prominent historian of medical education.¹  Except for a few academic schools which he praised, Flexner condemned the state of medical education in no uncertain terms.

The report called for the closure of all medical schools which did not demonstrate a commitment to scientific standards and did not incorporate a laboratory practice.  It also called for licensing laws to require higher educational standards. The report was consonant with the goals of the AMA, established in 1847 ostensibly to strengthen medical education and to reduce the number of physicians.  In fact, Flexner collaborated closely with members of the AMA, and the organization provided him with findings of a survey it had previously conducted and on which he relied to write his own, allegedly independent, report.

Q: What effect did the report have?

A: The Flexner report is frequently credited for setting into motion medical education reform, but this is erroneous.  Great improvements in education had already occurred in many academic institutions in the previous two decades, and the innovations and higher standards were spreading across the country prior to the report.

The main effect of the report was to change public and political opinion about medical education and to influence the implementation of strict licensing laws.  The change in sentiment was facilitated by the political and financial influence of organizations such as the Carnegie Corporation and the Rockefeller Foundation.

In the wake of the report, and under the lobbying efforts of the AMA, states rapidly established medical acts to regulate the issuance of medical licenses.  Henceforth, licenses would only be given to graduates of schools that met criteria set forth by the Flexner report.  Those medical schools would have to be accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, a joint venture of the AMA and its close ally, the American Association of Medical Colleges.

Q: What happened next?

A: From an economic standpoint, what happened next was a period of severe medical price inflation which occurred quickly and dramatically.  The situation was so serious that in 1925, a national Committee on the Costs of Medical Care (CCMC) was organized to address the question.

The CCMC was also funded by the Carnegie Corporation and by a number of other private foundations, such as the Rockefeller Foundation.  The committee received material assistance from the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other leading professional organizations, as well as from many government agencies, including the National Bureau of Economic Research.  Numerous reports were issued over the next few years, and those were compiled in 1932 into a large volume entitled The Costs of Medical Care.

Read More: http://alertandoriented.com/an-economic-history-of-the-american-health-care-system-part-1/

How Government Ruined Healthcare

Zoidberg Says To Trust Him

100 Years of Government’s “Managed” Health Care

Michael Accad 

The term “managed care” entered the common lexicon in the 1990s, when contracted arrangements between physicians and hospitals on the one hand, and insurance entities on the other, became standard means to try to control healthcare expenditures. The origin of the concept is frequently credited to Dr. Paul Ellwood and his influential Jackson Hole Group, who introduced the idea in the early 1970s.

But in my 2-part series on the economic history of American medicine, I examined how healthcare has been “managed” from its inception in the late 1910s, when the Flexnerian reforms and the ensuing medical licensing laws began to influence (and limit) the type of medical care Americans could choose to receive.

Since that time, an ever-growing managerial class of academics, industry leaders, technocrats, and private foundation believers in “systems” and in a “scientific” approach to organizing society has been guiding the various government interventions which have shaped American healthcare as we know it today.

And if we take the Flexnerian reforms of the mid-1910s to be the very first set of interventions giving birth to the system, then the history of American healthcare as it subsequently unfolded is a stark illustration of what economist Ludwig von Mises described in his 1950 essay “Middle-of-the-Road Policy Leads to Socialism.”

In that essay, Mises argued that when the government hopes to avoid the extremes of pure capitalism and pure socialism, and chooses instead to selectively intervene in a sector of the economy to address a “market failure,” it will either fall short of its intended goal or generate new, unanticipated difficulties that are invariably greater than the ones initially confronted. The reason for the failure has to do with an intrinsic deficiency in knowledge, as proposed by Hayek and Mises, to the inability of government to assume entrepreneurial risk, and to other relevant factors as well (political incentives and bureaucratic inertia, for example).

By the time the failures and unintended consequences of the government intervention are recognized, many interests have become vested in keeping the status quo. As a result, the intervention is almost never reversed, but additional government measures are proposed instead. As these generate their own unexpected problems, repeated cycles of intervention in due time bring the sector more and more under the control of government.

That scenario seems to have played out in healthcare over the last 100 years, and the history of our medical system could reasonably be described as a “Misesian” tragedy in five acts as follows:

Read More: http://galen.org/2016/100-years-of-governments-managed-health-care/

How Governments Ruined Healthcare and Why Single Payer is Based on Falsehoods

Wait Times in Canadian Healthcare

The Myth They Used to Pass Canada’s Universal Healthcare

  04/06/2018

A History Lesson

During the 19th and early 20th centuries, health care was offered in various ways, including through voluntary mutual-aid associations in Britain, Australia, and the United States. Roderick Long wrote about these fraternal societies, where members could subscribe to various services, including life insurance, disability insurance, and lodge practice. Lodge practice was an arrangement whereby a particular society or lodge would contract with a doctor to provide medical care to its members.

The doctor received a regular salary on a retainer basis, rather than charging per item; members would pay a yearly fee and then call on the doctor’s services as needed. If medical services were found unsatisfactory, the doctor would be penalized, and the contract might not be renewed. Lodge members reportedly enjoyed the degree of customer control this system afforded them. And the tendency to overuse the physician’s services was kept in check by the fraternal society’s own “self-policing”; lodge members who wanted to avoid future increases in premiums were motivated to make sure that their fellow members were not abusing the system.

The average cost of lodge practice for each member was between one and two dollars (a day’s wage) annually, whereas non-members paid the same price for each visit to the doctor. Doctors competed for lodge contracts, which kept costs low. The Canadian experience with lodge practice was similar, and, as in America and Britain, this infuriated the medical establishment.

The Medical Establishment

Most people (including rank and file doctors in the 19th century) are content to pursue their goals through voluntary interactions with others, and do not claim the right to tell others what they can and cannot do. However, there is always a minority who detest voluntary exchange on the free market, preferring to outlaw this activity by using government legislation to enrich themselves by dictating the terms of trade. This describes the medical establishment in the 19th century (and today). In Canadian Medicine, A Study In Restricted Entry (pp 195, 197), Ronald Hamowy wrote:

By the 1890s, lodge practice had reached sufficient proportions to become a common subject of condemnation in the medical journals. Of particular concern was the “cut-rate” fees for services charged by lodge practitioners, with a concomitant reduction in demand for full-priced medical services.

. . . the Canada Lancet, in commenting on the subject in 1905, noted: Just think for a moment how absurd it appears that a doctor should agree to attend a lodge of 200 men for $1.25 per year and supply the medicine! We do not hesitate to say that he would be better off by declining the $250 and take what he can get in the ordinary way.

What the Canada Lancet was really saying was “How absurd it is that a doctor should have the freedom to voluntarily negotiate fees with the riff raff. We do not hesitate to say that his selfish actions are preventing the superior medical establishment from raising their own incomes by dictating fees to the general public.”

The medical establishment wanted to raise their incomes by restricting the number of doctors (in part, by imposing irrelevant licensing criteria), but the public was not easily fooled. Hamowy (p 125) wrote:

Despite the actions of the College to suppress unregistered physicians, the public continued to firmly oppose prosecution of these practitioners throughout the nineteenth century. Nor did they believe the College and the medical journals when they insisted that their campaign against “quacks” was designed to separate out educated from unqualified physicians.

. . . many, especially poorer, Canadians persisted in consulting unlicensed physicians, whose fees were lower and who appeared no less competent in prescribing medications than did their registered brethren. The profession’s attempt to suppress these doctors was not motivated out of a selfless interest in improving the quality of medical care offered the public, but out of a desire to lessen competition, which would in turn increase their incomes.

Sadly, the medical establishment got its wish, as Hamowy (pp 129, 237) explains:

As early as 1869, one of the Council’s [Ontario Medical Council] representatives had remarked, to the delight of its other members, that “it would be a great boon to the country if not another student passed for ten years to come.”

. . . by the first decade of the twentieth century physicians throughout the Dominion had succeeded in gaining enactment of laws in each of the provinces limiting entry into the profession . . .

After many years of lobbying, the government gifted the medical establishment with legislation granting them monopoly powers over their industry, including licensing, under the pretense that only qualified physicians should be allowed to serve the public. (Government regulations always serve the interests of those who lobbied for the regulations.)

The medical establishment was highly incentivized to lobby and bribe politicians because the average monetary gain for each member of the establishment would be huge, compared to the average loss suffered by each member of the public. This dispersal of costs over a large number of citizens meant that they lacked an incentive to mount an effective opposition. Thus, the establishment gained at the expense of the public. That’s democracy!

Read More: https://mises.org/wire/myth-they-used-pass-canadas-universal-healthcare

Someone Wants You Dead and Doesn’t Mind if You do the Job for Them

antidepressant vs murder

The Big Secret The Mainstream Media Doesn’t Want To Tell You About America’s Soaring Suicide Rates

Michael Snyder 

On average, 123 Americans commit suicide every single day, and now suicide has become the 10th leading cause of death in the United States.

But among Americans between the ages of 10 and 34, it is now the second leading cause of death.

Of course it wasn’t always this way.  Suicide rates used to be much, much lower.  If you can believe it, suicide rates in the United States “have risen nearly 30 percent since 1999” according to the CDC…

….

So why is this happening?

History tells us that suicide rates tend to go up during economic recessions, but we are not in a recession at the moment.

According to NBC News, researchers have found that people that kill themselves tend to have certain things in common…

  • 42 percent had a relationship problem
  • 28 percent had substance abuse issues
  • 16 percent had job or financial problems
  • 29 percent had some kind of crisis
  • 22 percent had a physical health issue
  • 9 percent had a criminal legal problem

But those problems have always existed in our society.

To find the truth, we need to go down a rabbit hole, and it is a rabbit hole that the mainstream media doesn’t want to talk about.

The use of antidepressants and other mind-altering drugs is absolutely exploding in our society.  According to Time Magazine, the use of antidepressants rose almost 65 percent between 1999 and 2014…

Read More: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-big-secret-the-mainstream-media-doesnt-want-to-tell-you-about-americas-soaring-suicide-rates

For Profit Crisis: The Opioid Epidemic Is By Design

Opioid Epidemic in America
Opioid Epidemic in America

How Medicaid Funds and Fuels the Opioid Epidemic | The Daily Bell

By The Daily Bell Staff
February 17, 2018
The Senate report is entitled: Drugs for Dollars: How Medicaid Helps Fuel the Opioid Epidemic. The Majority Staff of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs released the report on January 17 of this year.

The information adds to the evidence of corruption in the distribution of opioid painkillers as well as opioids prescribed to combat addiction.

Far from helping in recovery, government funds are used by criminals to profit from and exacerbate the epidemic.

Read More: www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/how-medicaid-funds-and-fuels-the-opioid-epidemic/

Revolving Door Between CDC and Drugs Manufacturers Reveals Vaccine Dangers Cover-up

Do You Know What's in Your Vaccine?

Time To Expose MD Julie Gerberding, Former CDC Director, For Her Role In CDC’s Vaccine Fraud

Dr. Julie Gerberding, MD, was CDC’s Director [1] until she resigned and then ‘advanced’ on to the job of , proving the “revolving door culture” that exists between Big Pharma and federal health agencies, especially FDA and the CDC.

CDC epidemiologist and whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, tells how he went to Dr. Gerberding telling her what was going on with the study finding autism implications in young black boys less than three years of age.

Dr. Thompson was the lead researcher on that project.  Therefore, he was supposed to deliver the findings at a conference.  He was pulled from the project; it was given to Dr. Frank DeStefano, who delivered the results at the conference, while the rest of the story is divulged in the documentary VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.

Read More: https://www.activistpost.com/2018/04/time-to-expose-md-julie-gerberding-former-cdc-director-for-her-role-in-cdcs-vaccine-fraud.html

References:

[1] http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2002/07/julie-gerberding-named-director-cdc

Resources:

The Mary and Sallie Blog Talk Radio Show About Protesting Dr. Gerberding’s Award
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/themaryandsallieshow/2018/03/30/worship-of-the-unethical-protest-53-nyc-heather-turano-dr-brian-hooker

Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”
https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/former-cdc-director-that-approved-gardasil-vaccine-and-became-head-of-mercks-vaccine-division-named-woman-of-the-year/

A Matter of Right and Wrong: the CDC’s Troubling Lack of Research Ethics 
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-matter-of-right-and-wrong-the-cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process(2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available.

Who’re the Real Mass Murderers in America?

Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder

antidepressant vs murder

Major pharmaceutical companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars covering up lawsuits over suicides and mass murders caused by popular antidepressants.

Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.

While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI’s have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:

Read More: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/big-pharma-has-spent-millions-covering-up-suicides-and-mass-murder-caused-by-antidepressants/