Acosta Claimed Epstein’s Deal was Because He Was Intelligence Asset

This is a bombshell that came out from the Daily Beast (mainstream media):

When asked about the Epstein deal, Acosta said he was told to back off because Epstein was an intelligence asset.

This explains a lot about why Epstein was allowed to operate this ring. The richest people in the world paid him for sex with children and the intelligence agencies used it as a honey trap to blackmail and control his clients.

Epstein Acosta Intelligence Asset

Jeffrey Epstein’s Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight

Vicky Ward 07.09.19

“Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)”

Read More: https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight

Former state’s attorney pushes back against Acosta account of Epstein case

BY BRETT SAMUELS 07/10/19

The Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office had prepared a federal indictment against Epstein, but it was never filed. Acosta has also faced criticism for failing to disclose the plea deal to Epstein’s victims, something he said would have jeopardized the agreement.

Krischer downplayed his office’s role in the eventual plea deal, and alleged the U.S. Attorney’s Office abandoned its federal indictment after “secret negotiations between Mr. Epstein’s lawyers and Mr. Acosta.”

“If Mr. Acosta was truly concerned with the State’s case and felt he had to rescue the matter, he would have moved forward with the 53-page indictment that his own office drafted,” Krischer said.

Krischer said his office subpoenaed witnesses took evidence to a grand jury, which returned a single felony count indictment against Epstein of soliciting prostitution.

But Palm Beach police who worked the case at the time told The Miami Herald as part of an investigation published in November that they felt pressured by Krischer to downgrade Epstein’s case to a misdemeanor or to drop it entirely.

Read More: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/452527-former-florida-state-attorney-pushes-back-against-acosta-account-of