The Corporate-Globalist-Leftist Media Machine Does NOT Care About the Children

CPS Legal Kidnapping

Why Does The Press Only Seem To Care About Broken Attachments For Border-Crossing Children?

By    21, 2018

Pediatricians and immigrant advocates in South Texas are sounding the alarm that separating migrant children from their parents is giving them “toxic stress.” Change.org offers a tool kit to protest this trauma. Report after report features distraught children torn from the arms of their parents. This really is a tragic picture, although the parents put themselves at risk by heading across the border in spite of warnings they would be separated from their children.

A deeper question, though, lurks beneath this sudden concern for the welfare of children at the border. The repercussions associated with broken attachments and disrupted bonding are widely known and extensively researched. But why has the spotlight landed on migrant children in particular, when so many others in the United States suffer the same kind of trauma? It seems attachment theory is only relevant to the press when it serves liberal ideological ends.

A Deafening Silence
For children tossed around in foster care, for example, the silence around broken bonding is deafening. It’s as though notions of bonding, attachment, and the developmental needs of children do not exist.

In the current crisis of opioid addiction and foster care, many children form attachments to a family who wants to adopt them, often waiting up to three years for a birth parent or blood relative to come forward or enter drug treatment. These children live in foster care Never-Never Land, but they also bond with a family while they wait. All too often, these children are then ripped out of the only family they have ever known, suffering the trauma of broken attachments, over and over again. This is the tragedy that doesn’t make the news.

Read More: http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/21/press-seem-care-broken-attachments-border-crossing-children/

Mom Brings Coughing 10-Month-Old to the Hospital. Days Later, Cops Take the Baby.

‘They already had a foster parent in the room, to remove my son… before they ever proved there was an emergency situation.’

Fox 9 reports that Dwight Mitchell, the founder, had his child taken away from him “unfairly” for 22 months. His group now has over 1,000 members. One of them is Amanda Weber, whose son was taken from her for a week after she brought him to the hospital to be examined for a cough:

The doctor deemed him stable and notes show the diagnosis was, in fact, a cough. However, the recommendation was that the patient should have stayed. Weber took him home.

“After waiting, I had asked to leave because I wanted to put my kids to bed and I had my three-year-old with me and I asked if there was anything else that had to be done,” said Weber.

“They said ‘No, there was no other testing or anything that needed to be done.'”

In a couple of days, police were at her door and took Zayvion to the doctor.

“She checked him out, all his vitals were stable,” she said. “They already had a foster parent in the room, in the room to remove my son before they ever proved … before they ever proved there was an emergency situation.”

This practice—overly suspicious government officials seizing children from their parents—isn’t confined to Minnesota. In Chicago, a mom named Stephanie took her toddler, “A,” to the doctor because the girl’s arm seemed tender. The doctor said it was probably just a case of “nursemaid’s elbow,” but suggested mom follow up at the hospital, where it was discovered that the girl had a fracture. Emergency room doctors assured Stephanie that fractures were very common in toddlers learning to walk. However, the one doctor on staff who specialized in “child abuse pediatrics,” thought otherwise.

The Family Defense Center in Chicago took the case. In its newsletter, the group writes that the Department of Child and Family Services allowed the child to go home:

….but only on the condition that Stephanie move out of her own home and have supervised contact with A. Because Stephanie has no relatives in Chicago, her parents flew to Chicago each week from the San Francisco Bay Area to care for A. This exhausting ordeal continued for nearly four months.

During the investigation, DCFS blatantly ignored the opinions of the leading orthopedists and relied exclusively on the child abuse doctor’s opinion. In March, the State’s Attorney’s office filed a petition to take custody of A., initiating a court proceeding that lasted for two and a half months.

Finally, in mid-May, the State’s Attorney’s office concluded that it did not have enough evidence to proceed further, and it asked the juvenile court judge to dismiss the petition. Eventually, the “child abuse” doctor rescinded his conclusion that abuse had caused the fracture.

Read More: http://reason.com/blog/2018/06/18/cps-mom-baby-cops-kidnapping

LIBERAL HYPOCRISY: An American Child Was Separated From Her Mother In California With No End In Sight

California Courts and Child Protective Services have thwarted
Ruby’s every attempt to find the whereabouts of her daughter

In view of the liberal outcry and feigned furor about the illegal immigrant’s “child separation” issue, the story of Lexi Dillon is as unbelievable as it is typical of the dysfunctional State of California.  The following article provides an excellent overview of this uniquely American horror story — known as Lexi’s saga — which refuses to end.

The egregious breakdown of the Orange County Child Protective Services (CPS) and family court system in California is well-documented in the case of Lexi Dillon.  Instead of protecting Lexi, the California CPS has gone out of its way to put her in harm’s way time and again.  Ditto that for the presiding judges in this sordid matter.

We’re Living in Extraordinary Times as Deep State Crimes are Being Exposed

Crime with Her

Bombshells Everywhere During Horowitz Day 2 Testimony

Zero Hedge June/19/2018

Inspector General Michael Horowitz returned to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to answer questions at a joint hearing of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, one day after he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

While Monday’s testimony by Horowitz and FBI Director Christopher Wray was certainly eye-opening – Congressional Investigators uncovered several game-changing bombshells on Tuesday that will re-frame the entire discussion. Hat-tip to Paul Sperry for reporting these stunning developments in real time.

  • There were no actual subjects of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, meaning that neither Hillary nor any of her top aides – including Huma Abedin and the IT guys who set up her illegal server and then used “bleachbit” to destroy evidence (for which they received immunity) – were ever under any direct FBI scrutiny. Horowitz found this “surprising.”
  • There is at least one and possibly more original drafts of the OIG report, which were subsequently redlined by DOJ/FBI higher-ups.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has sent a formal letter to Horowitz requesting “the various drafts of the report, particularly the draft provided to the DOJ and FBI, before those agencies made any changes to the draft report.”

  • Horowitz is no longer convinced that the FBI was collecting all of Strzok and Page’s texts, even outside the five-month window in which a technical “glitch” (after the 2016 election) prevented archiving.
  • Horowitz is investigating allegations that FBI officials “edited” agents’ 302 forms – which doument an interview with a suspect or a witness.

This is particularly illuminating, as is has been long suspected that fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe had agents edit or delete the “302” forms created after former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s interview.

Journalist Sara Carter – known of late for her access to leaks by “white hat” actors in the intelligence community, sat down with Sean Hannity in late January where she discussed McCabe’s firing and suggested “there’s indicators right now that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302’s

It may also explain why the judge in Flynn’s case ordered Special Counsel Robert Mueller to turn over any “exculpatory evidence” to Flynn’s defense team. Flynn’s legal team did not make this request. Instead, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued the order “sua sponte,” or at his discretion, invoking the “Brady Rule” – which requires prosecutors to turn over previously unfiled evidence that might have a material impact on a defendant’s case. Interestingly, two days before the order Mueller filed a motion for an agreed-upon protective order regarding the use of evidence in the case, including “sensitive materials,” provided to Flynn’s lawyers by the office of the Special Counsel.

  • The two anti-Trump / pro-Clinton agents we reported on Friday who were having an extramarital affair were “unmasked” by House Judiciary member Mark Meadows (R-NC) after Horowitz testified that one of the two – who interviewed Hillary Clinton – was referred for discipline.

The unmasked agents are Sally Moyer (“Agent 1”) and Kevin Kleinsman (“Agent 5). As reported on Friday, Moyer  referred to Clinton as “the President” in a text exchange with another FBI employee four days after interviewing her, according to Thursday’s DOJ Inspector General report.

Then, in a different text exchange with one of the other three Clinton email investigators (not Peter Strzok or Lisa Page), another agent wrote “screw you trump” after the first agent admitted “You should know…that I’m…with her.”

This means that all four FBI case agents working the Hillary Clinton email investigation – the other two being Peter Strzok and Lisa Page – were ardent Clinton supporters, and at least three harbored animus towards Trump. 

The same agent who texted “screw you trump” – “Agent 5” – also wrote “she better win… otherwise i’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns… and likely quitting on the spot,” as well as “fuck trump” on December 6.

Clinton was interviewed by FBI agents on July 2 about her use of a private, unsecured email server which housed classified information while she was Secretary of State. According to the IG report, however, the FBI had already decided against recommending prosecution unless Clinton lied or confessed.

By the time of Clinton’s interview on July 2, we found that the Midyear agents and prosecutors, along with Comey, had decided that absent a confession or false statements by Clinton, the investigation would be closed without charges,” reads the IG report.

Read More: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-19/bombshells-everywhere-during-horowitz-day-2-testimony

Real Talk: Legal Immigration and ILLEGAL Immigration are not the SAME Things

every 30 seconds another person becomes a victim of human trafficking

People like myself that believe (for reasons not racist) that one of the only good purposes of a federal government is to secure the border. 

“Our founders, asserted their concerns publicly and routinely about the effects of indiscriminate mass immigration. They made it clear that the purpose of allowing foreigners into our fledgling nation was not to recruit millions of new voters or to secure permanent ruling majorities for their political parties. It was to preserve, protect, and enhance the republic they put their lives on the line to establish.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/…/immigration-founding…/

Though, I don’t agree with separating families, the media coverage is almost entirely exaggerated and hyperbolic to create an emotional reaction against Trump, while excluding a bunch of important and rational details…

“…the reporting from the border has also been incomplete, misleading, and at times biased and emotionally overwrought. It’s no secret the mainstream media disagrees with Trump’s push to crack down on illegal immigration and tighten border security, but that shouldn’t excuse the lack of nuance and granularity in much of the reporting we’ve seen over the past week or so.”
http://thefederalist.com/…/4-things-media-wont-tell…/

I think his base is concerned about illegal immigration, the argument is hardly ever against LEGAL immigration but the media acts like they’re all purely racist against all immigrants.

“It’s not personal. Republicans aren’t anti-immigrant. They’re anti-illegal immigration. It’s the basis of any society to prioritize its resources for its own members rather than diverting them to people in other societies. Our society is our responsibility, their societies are their responsibility.”
http://thefederalist.com/…/no-americans-want-border…/

Not everyone’s racist, there are still a large number that voted for Obama, and also voted for Trump.

“ANES data suggest that about 8.4 million 2012 Obama voters backed Trump in 2016 ”
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/…/just-how-many-obama…/

I think most people and sources agree that legal immigration is a win win…

“Immigration’s Long-Term Impacts on Overall Wages and Employment of Native-Born U.S. Workers Very Small, Although Low-Skilled Workers May Be Affected, New Report Finds; Impacts on Economic Growth Positive, While Effects on Government Budgets Mixed”
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx… 

and the media for “some reason” doesn’t want to admit that ILLEGAL immigration is a negative on our society…

“Illegal immigration costs Americans billions of dollars each year. Illegal aliens are net consumers of taxpayer-funded services and the limited taxes paid by some segments of the illegal alien population are, in no way, significant enough to offset the growing financial burdens imposed on U.S. taxpayers by massive numbers of uninvited guests.”
https://www.fairus.org/…/fiscal-burden-illegal…

There is no Justice in Corrupt AmeriCCCA

 

The Only CIA Officer in Prison for Torture is the Whistleblower who Exposed it

The Steady Enmity of Powerful People

“Crime doesn’t pay.” Actually it does, handsomely. If you are a banker or large financial player, it pays wonderfully. You get filthy rich committing the crimes and after…you continue to get filthy rich.

What doesn’t pay is reporting crime.

Not long ago I read a rather good book about a small number of honest people who did not understand this dirty fact. It was a book telling the stories of the handful of honest and tragically idealistic insiders who blew the whistle about banking fraud and crime during the Global Bank Debt Crisis.  It was full of disturbing facts. Not the least of which is that not one of their stories ended well.

All of the stories involved the whistleblower following the law and reporting their concerns. In every story the result was being threatened with punitive, some might say vindictive, legal action by the very banks whose wrong doing they had reported.  In every case the ‘Proper Authorities’, in charge of regulating the banks, hung the whistleblowers out to dry.

Read More: http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2018/06/the-steady-enmity-of-powerful-people/

A Quality Rundown of the “Family Separation” Immigration Policy

4 Things The Media Won’t Tell You About The Border Crisis

By    20, 2018

The images and stories now being reported from the southern border—families torn apart, children crying for their parents, parents with no idea where their children are—are disturbing and heartbreaking

The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration enforcement policy has obviously created chaos along the border, tasking already overburdened federal agencies with the seemingly impossible job of taking into custody everyone—men, women, and children—caught crossing the border illegally. The number of children taken from their parents and placed in federal custody climbed to about 2,000 from April 19 through May 31, according to figures from the Department of Homeland Security. With border facilities overwhelmed, some teenagers are now being housed in temporary shelters outside El Paso.

But the reporting from the border has also been incomplete, misleading, and at times biased and emotionally overwrought. It’s no secret the mainstream media disagrees with Trump’s push to crack down on illegal immigration and tighten border security, but that shouldn’t excuse the lack of nuance and granularity in much of the reporting we’ve seen over the past week or so.

Illegal immigration and its attendant problems along the U.S.-Mexico border are vastly complex and defy easy solutions. With that in mind, here are four key aspects of the border crisis that the media has failed to report or adequately explain.

1. Prior To ‘Zero Tolerance,’ Families Who Crossed The Border Illegally Were Often Released

For a long time, the vast majority of illegal border crossers were single men from Mexico looking for work. Dealing with them was a fairly straightforward matter: most would be immediately deported to Mexico. It’s not that there weren’t families and unaccompanied minors also illegally entering, but they made up a small subset of illegal immigration.

Beginning in 2014, the situation changed. Large numbers of families and unaccompanied minors began showing up on the border in unprecedented numbers, many seeking asylum from dangerous criminal gangs in their home countries. Most of these foreign citizens were from Central America, not Mexico, and under a 2008 federal law designed to protect victims of human trafficking, migrants from noncontiguous countries have a right to a deportation hearing.

That meant the Obama administration had to figure out what to do with tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors and families that could not be quickly deported. Some were placed in shelters run by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) along the border, but because shelter space was limited, many more were placed with family members while they awaited hearings. Thousands have waited more than three years for a hearing, and thousands more have been ordered to be removed from the country in absentia (they never showed up for their hearing).

During this time, Obama was attacked from the Left for operating family detention centers in Texas and Pennsylvania. A New York Times editorial from July 2016 criticized the administration’s detention policies, saying the “privately run, unlicensed lockups are no place for children. Or mothers.”

A year earlier, a federal judge had ordered the administration to close two centers in Texas, citing the 1997 court settlement Flores v. Reno, which requires the government to hold children in the “least-restrictive setting” in places that are “licensed to care for children,” and to release them without delay to their parents or other adult relatives whenever possible. The Obama administration unsuccessfully appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which upheld the district court’s ruling that Flores applied to all children, accompanied or not. But the court also said the administration could detain parents who crossed illegally.

The Obama administration responded to these rulings with a combination of deportation raids targeting criminals and a “catch-and-release” policy for families apprehended at the border, who would usually be issued notices to appear at an immigration hearing at some later date. This “catch-and-release” policy is what the Trump administration is trying to end.

To that end, Trump has invoked Flores as the reason for separating parents and children, saying the settlement limits what federal agencies can do with children brought here illegally and apprehended at the border. He blames congressional Democrats for failing to negotiate on an immigration bill that would solve the problem—although saddling Democrats with all the blame is disingenuous. Republicans have also failed to act on immigration (although now they say they’re ready to pass a bill to keep families together).

The media have been nearly unanimous in contradicting Trump, arguing that Flores does not force the federal government to separate parents and children, and that the administration has discretion in how it treats these families.

Both sides have a point. Flores does indeed limit how long, and under what circumstances, federal immigration authorities can detain children. But it only “forces” the separation of families if the parents are detained and prosecuted for illegal entry. In that case, families are separated because children can’t stay with their parents if the parents are in criminal custody.

Before Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy, families caught crossing illegally were often released within a few days and the parents fitted with an electronic ankle monitor to reduce the likelihood of them absconding. Back in March, when I was reporting on the border in McAllen, Texas, I met a number of people from Central America who were wearing an ankle monitor. Most planned to cut it off and throw it away when they got to where they were going.

2. Illegal Immigrants Who Are Released Often Fail To Appear At Court Hearings

Indeed, failure to appear at court hearings is a major problem in our immigration system—one the media is glossing over in its coverage of the border crisis.

According to the DOJ’s Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), the office that handles all immigration cases, a significant number of illegal immigrants who are released from custody never show up for their court hearings. Statistics from 2016 (PDF) show that “non-detained aliens,” which include those who were never detained and those who were released on bond or their own recognizance, failed to show up for court hearings in 39 percent of completed immigration cases—a 110 percent increase compared to 2012.

Read More: http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/20/4-things-media-wont-tell-border-crisis/

Conflict of Interest: Criminal Global Banking Conglomerates Own the Media

Trust Me

Yesterday I pointed out that…

even when global banking conglomerates are caught red-handed, profiting from human misery (including human trafficking and sex trade) they only get fined. No one goes to jail, because the politicians are on the take…
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

Well, today I would like to further point out how the media is partially owned by the big banks, so they won’t go very far to raise outrage when they get caught supporting human traffickers…

It’s just one example but it turns out that HSBC holds massive amounts of Time Warner stock. Time Warner owns Turner, Turner owns CNN. CNN pays Anderson Cooper to read whatever they tell him to.

“Hsbc Holdings PLC increased its position in shares of Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) by 24.6% in the 1st quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 1,984,015 shares of the media conglomerate’s stock after buying an additional 391,221 shares during the period. Hsbc Holdings PLC’s holdings in Time Warner were worth $187,648,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.”

Read More: https://www.tickerreport.com/…/time-warner-twx-position…

Well, just one example of how an international bank that was caught profiting from Cartel money (which includes profits from human trafficking) is also a major investor in an American Media conglomerate.

Do you really think that international corporations work for the good of the people?

You really think that what they call “news” and “information” are legitimate and not pro-corporate, pro-crime propaganda? 

It’s propaganda-for-profit.

Human Trafficking is Why We Need to Deter Undocumented, Unsafe, Illegal Border Crossings…

People have the best intentions.

But undocumented children in detention was at an all time high in 2014, under Obama, but the media didn’t direct people’s attention to it because they were pro-Obama.

The outrage is sincere now, but it’s been manufactured by the media directing our attention where they want to.

My issue isn’t with intentions or people’s justified emotions, my issue is with the outcomes of encouraging more people trafficking and people smuggling. It’s big business and it’s about preying on people and children.

America can’t actually house the entire world’s population of would-be economic migrants, so we shouldn’t encourage them to live here undocumented.

If they have legitimate asylum claims, let them come legally. If they want to immigrate, let them immigrate legally and safely.

They can follow the rules just like everyone has to. If I break the law, do I not get separated from my family? Where should unaccompanied minors live? In the street? In brothels or in slave labor conditions?

Encouraging them to pay human smugglers and travel dangerously and illegally through international borders and waters to live undocumented in the shadows is not actually helping the children.

Look at this judge’s finding from 09-311 – USA V. NAVA-MARTINEZ

Federal Judge: The Obama Administration Aids and Abets Human Trafficking

Hans A. von Spakovsky   Dec 20th, 2013

“As Judge Hanen pointed out, the human-trafficking conspiracy instigated by Salmeron Santos was interrupted when Nava-Martinez was arrested, but the “goal of the conspiracy was successfully completed thanks to the actions of the United States.” Hanen expressed grave concern over the “apparent policy of [DHS] of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States.”

After the child was taken into custody, DHS agents learned that the mother had “instigated this illegal conduct.” Yet DHS delivered the child to the mother and took no enforcement action: “It did not arrest her. It did not prosecute her. It did not even initiate deportation proceedings for her.” As the judge said, “instead of enforcing the laws of the United States, the Government took direct steps to help the individuals who violated it,” conduct for which any “private citizen would, and should, be prosecute.”

What especially angered the judge was that this was the fourth case of this nature that he “had in as many weeks.” All involved “human traffickers who smuggled minor children [and] were apprehended short of delivering the children to their ultimate destination.” In each case, the parents were in this country illegally and had initiated and funded the illegal activity. And in each instance, DHS completed the crime by delivering the child to the parents and refusing to take any action against them.”

Read More: https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/federal-judge-the-obama-administration-aids-and-abets-human-trafficking

Obama Appointee Judges Working for Open Borders, Because: Screw Main St. America

Hillary Clinton My Dream is for Open Borders

Court Rules Illegal Aliens Can Sue over “Discriminatory Employment Policy” Requiring Green Cards

APRIL 11, 2018

For the second time in a few years, a federal court has ruled that illegal immigrants can sue American employers that refuse to hire them because they require workers to be U.S. citizens or legal residents (green card holders). The latest blow to the rule of law was delivered by an Obama-appointed federal judge in south Florida, who handed a powerful open-borders group a huge victory in a case accusing a major U.S. company of discriminating against an illegal immigrant.

Though years apart, both lawsuits were filed by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), a leftist group that specializes in discrimination lawsuits on behalf of illegal immigrants and has Chicago ties to Obama. MALDEF pushes for free college tuition for illegal immigrants and lowering educational standards to accommodate new migrants. Its leadership refers to the U.S. government’s immigration enforcement effort as racist and xenophobic and says it’s racist to make English the country’s official national language and inhumane to protect the southern border with a fence. Both MALDEF victories involve plaintiffs who benefit from a special Obama amnesty known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that shields nearly 800,000 illegal aliens under the age of 31 from deportation.

In the recent Florida case a Venezuelan immigrant, David Rodriguez, living in Miami is suing consumer goods corporation Procter & Gamble for refusing to give him a paid internship because he is not a legal resident or citizen of the United States. MALDEF filed the lawsuit last year in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Procter & Gamble requires citizenship and immigration status information on its applications and warns that candidates “must be a U.S. citizen or national, refugee, asylee or lawful permanent resident.” Rodriquez is neither and he quickly played the discrimination card after getting nixed as a candidate. In a statement MALDEFF’s president reminds that “work-authorized DACA holders are valuable contributors to our economy” and “should not have to face arbitrary and biased exclusions from employment, especially by large and sophisticated corporations like Procter & Gamble.”

Judge Kathleen M. Williams, a former public defender appointed to the federal bench by Obama in 2011, agrees, citing MALDEF’s other lawsuit in her ruling. In denying Procter & Gamble’s motion to dismiss Rodriguez’s lawsuit, Judge Williams claims the Venezuelan immigrant’s claims are “strikingly similar” to those in MALDEF’s 2014 suit against insurance company Northwestern Mutual in New York. In that complaint, a Mexican illegal alien protected by DACA alleged that Northwestern Mutual’s policy requiring him to have a green card because he’s not a U.S. citizen discriminated against him. Requiring the Mexican national, Ruben Juarez, to provide proof of legal residency imposed an additional burden that constitutes alienage discrimination, according to the complaint filed on his behalf by MALDEF.  The federal judge hearing that case in New York agreed and, in a federal courtroom more than 1,000 miles south, Williams used the decision to justify hers.

“In Juarez, the plaintiff was a DACA recipient who was denied employment based on Northwestern Mutual’s policy to only hire U.S. citizens and green card holders,” Judge Williams writes in her ruling. “There, on strikingly similar facts, the court found that Northwestern Mutual’s policy impermissibly discriminated against a subclass of Iawfully present aliens.” The ruling continues to say that Procter & Gamble’s policy could be construed to discriminate against a subset of legal aliens, which are protected. It seems to agree with the illegal alien’s assertions that Procter & Gamble has a “facially discriminatory employment policy” for requiring candidates to furnish proof that they’re in the U.S. legally.

Read More: https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2018/04/court-rules-illegal-aliens-can-sue-discriminatory-employment-policy-requiring-green-cards/

Which is worse? Children being detained at certified detention centers, or children being sex trafficked?

Who profits from international human smuggling and sex trafficking?

If You Dont Want to be Separated From Your Children Dont Cross the Border Illegally

The reason the media wants open borders is because they’re a part of a global corporate machine that profits from drugs and weapons smuggling, and from human smuggling and sex trafficking….
https://www.theguardian.com/…/…/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs

What about sex trafficking?
“Sex trafficking is a $99 billion a year industry.”
“4.5 million people are victims of sex trafficking. The average age is 15, but 20% of sex trafficking victims are children.”
https://www.army.mil/article/165364/operational_contract_support_joint_exercise_combats_human_trafficking

And what about human smuggling?
“2.5 million people were smuggled in 2016, for an estimated profit of $7 billion.”
https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glosom/GLOSOM_2018_ExecutiveSummary_web_small.pdf

Where does all of that profit go?

Does it all stay as billions of dollars in cash?

No. It gets laundered by global banks, and is in turn funneled to complicit politicians…
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/15/hsbc-has-form-mexico-laundered-drug-money

Even when the corporations get caught, they only get fined. No one goes to jail, because the politicians are on the take…
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

HSBC lobbying by year…
https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000021791&year=2017

The media companies are also on the take…
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31517545

The politicians are on the take…
“Clinton Foundation recieved $81 million from clients of HSBC’s Swiss Money Laundering bank”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-donors-hsbc-swiss-bank

The law that separates children from smugglers was on the books since 2002. The law states how unaccompanied minors and minors being smuggled by smugglers should be detained and moved into foster parenting or kept in certified centers…
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=614

In 2014 Obama announced that they would no longer enforce the law and would allow undocumented, illegal border crossers to not be immediately deported…
https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Volpp.Immigrants.Outisde.the_.Law_.pdf

Since the Obama executive branch stopped enforcing the law, child smuggling and illegal border crossings increased to emergency levels..
“The Obama administration last year initially blamed bad economies and growing gang violence in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala for sparking the surge, but later acknowledged that human traffickers were marketing the journey by pointing out a loophole in U.S. immigration system that requires non-Mexican children to be released into the U.S. while they await final immigration decisions. That gives them a chance to abscond and disappear into the shadows with the more than 11 million other illegal immigrants in the country.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/6/illegal-immigrant-children-surge-across-border-at-/

The law, if properly applied, is to NOT separate children from families that seek asylum and cross the border LEGALLY…
“Children continue to be released to their relatives or to shelters. But since the zero-tolerance policy took effect, parents as a rule are being prosecuted.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/06/19/the-facts-about-trumps-policy-of-separating-families-at-the-border/?utm_term=.868b6eee98df

But there has been a rise in people falsely claiming to be relatives of smuggled children…
“…a growing number of cases, illegal immigrants who aren’t even related to the children are showing up and fraudulently claiming to be families.Homeland Security recorded 191 cases of children having to be separated because of fraudulent family claims during the first five months of fiscal year 2018. That already eclipses the 46 cases reported for all of 2017.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/22/children-abducted-illegals-posing-families-us-bord/

Should people crossing the border illegally not be prosecuted?
Should children being smuggled across the border illegally be put in jail with the adults that smuggled them?

How much should we encourage illegal entries when we know that they are fueling an illegal industry of human smuggling, sex trafficking and drug and gun smuggling?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/06/18/migrant-crisis-is-about-the-drug-cartel/

New “politically incorrect” climate change book sells out everywhere; “point-by-point take down” of global warming nonsense

 

Global Warming Marvelous Excuse Supra-National Socialism - Margaret Thatcher

Tuesday, April 17, 2018
by: 

(Natural News) Proving once again that the Left’s claims about human-caused “climate change” and “global warming” are anything but universal, a new book disputing their progressive nonsense has shot to number one on bestseller lists while selling out all over the place.

The appropriately named tome, “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change,” by Marc Morano, has rocketed to No. 1 on Amazon’s Climatology, Environmental Science, Nature and Ecology list, and is maintaining a solid ranking among Amazon’s Top 100, having already sold out once. Retail giant Walmart is also selling the book now.

A reported by Climate Depot, a website dedicated to exposing the fraud that is man-caused global and climate change edited by Morano, both Target and Walmart list the book “out of stock” on their websites, as of this writing.

He notes that the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which publishes Climate Depotdoes have copies of Morano’s book, however. 

A description of the book notes:

Less freedom. More regulation. Higher costs. Make no mistake: those are the surefire consequences of the modern global warming campaign waged by political and cultural elites, who have long ago abandoned fact-based science for dramatic fearmongering in order to push increased central planning. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change gives a voice — backed by statistics, real-life stories, and incontrovertible evidence — to the millions of “deplorable” Americans skeptical about the multibillion dollar “climate change” complex, whose claims have time and time again been proven wrong.

Sponsored solution from CWC Labs: This allows you to test almost anything for 20+ heavy metals and nutritive minerals, including lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, aluminum and more. You can test your own hair, vitamins, well water, garden soil, superfoods, pet hair, beverages and other samples (no blood or urine). ISO accredited laboratory using ICP-MS (mass spec) analysis with parts per billion sensitivity. .

The book is winning plaudits from readers and pundits alike. 

Talk host Mark Levin, a former Justice Department official in the Reagan administration and co-founder of CRTV, called Morano a “one-man general” leading the effort against the climate hoaxers.

“Marc Morano and he’s a terrific guy and he has written a brand new book ‘The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change.’ — I can’t possibly in this segment give this book the attention it deserves or give you the attention you deserve. You are like a one-man general fighting this effort and you have a complete comprehension of it. I want to strongly encourage my audience [to read it] — it’s digestible, it’s in plain English,” he said during a recent interview.

Conservative pundit and author Cal Thomas noted, “Read this book and you will become an informed climate change denier, armed with arguments and facts to counter the propaganda being pushed by climate change fanatics.” (Related: UN official actually ADMITS that ‘global warming’ is a scam designed to ‘change world’s economic model.’)

“I took everything Al Gore did in his books and movies and tried to do the exact opposite: use humor, entertainment and fun,” Morano told the Washington Times.

The paper further noted: 

That makes his ideological foes even angrier…The liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America once dubbed him “Misinformer of the Year.” The 2015 documentary “Merchants of Doubt” portrayed him as a mustache-twirling villain. The progressive news/opinion website The Daily Kos slammed him as “evil personified.

In his book Morano essentially refutes the Left-wing climate doom-and-gloomers, noting that no, the sky isn’t falling, and no, there is no hard-and-fast, replicable evidence to ‘prove’ that our SUVs, cattle farts, and technology is sabotaging the planet.

The fact is, despite the claim on the Left that “97 percent of climate scientists agree” with the man-caused premise, it’s simply not true. That statistic is based on a hugely flawed sampling that was given overly broad ‘authority’ after then-President Barack Obama tweeted on May 16, 2013: “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made, and dangerous.”

No one really disputes that the earth has warmed about a degree over the 100 or so years. No one really disputes that our climate is “changing.”

Where the alarmists lose people is when they blame it on just about every facet of life.

See more of the nonsense at Climate.news.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources include:

ClimateDepot.com

WashingtonTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

Read More: https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-17-new-politically-incorrect-climate-change-book-sells-out-everywhere.html